azide, and thiols.4 A recent result also shows a short synthesis
of 2,3,5-trisubstituted pyrroles using these reactions.4a We
would like to report herein a practical synthesis of N-
allylideneamines 1a,b and the subsequent double nucleophilic
addition reactions with them.
Although we attempted the synthesis of N-allylideneamine
1, e.g., deprotection of the 3-trimethylsilyl-protected imine,
oxidation of the allylamines using various oxidants,5 and
condensation of acrolein with amines in the presence of MS
4Å, the imine 1 was not obtained at all. When the condensa-
tion of acrolein with the amine was carried out in the
presence Ti(OEt)4, the reaction proceeded smoothly to afford
N-allylideneamine 1a,b having a diphenylethyl or trityl group
(Scheme 1).
Figure 1. LUMO coefficients of acrolein and N-allylideneamine.
regioselectivity for 1,4- and 1,2-addition. Both acrolein and
N-allylideneamine 1a have larger coefficients at the 4-posi-
tion, and the major reaction course based on the HOMO-
LUMO interaction would be the 1,4-addition. The involve-
ment of the steric factors suggests that it would be easier
for N-allylideneamines to be attacked at the 4-position than
for acrolein.
Scheme 1. Preparation of N-Allylideneamines
We next carried out 1,4- and 1,2-double nucleophilic
additions of ketene silyl acetals and trimethylsilyl cyanide
to N-allylideneamines 1a,b. The N-allylideneamines 1b was
decomposed upon treatment with Lewis acids such as AlCl3,
TiCl4, and Ti(OiPr)4. The N-allylideneamine 1a was also
decomposed under the influence of AlCl3 and TiCl4. In
contrast to the case with 1b, however, when Ti(OiPr)4 was
used as a Lewis acid, formation of the 1,2-addition product
with TMSCN was confirmed by 1H NMR (Scheme 2). These
In order to study the characteristics of these N-allylide-
neamines, we caluculated the LUMO coefficients of the
carbonyl (or imino) carbons and ꢀ-carbons, which would
suggest regioselectivities on the addition of nucleophiles.6
Based on molecular orbital calculations, electronic and steric
effects of the substituent at the imino nitrogen atom should
be rationalized (Figure 1).7
Scheme 2. Double Nucleophilic Additions to N-Allylideneamine
Structures were fully optimized with HF/6-31G* level
using geometry optimization. Calculations were shown to
be comparable with the ab initio (HF/STO-3G) method.8 The
values of LUMO coefficients at each reaction site (2- and
4-positions) and the absolute value differences between these
coefficients for the optimized geometries are summarized for
comparison (Figure 1). Comparison of LUMO coefficients
of acrolein and N-allylideneamine 1a gave an estimation of
(4) (a) Shimizu, M.; Takahashi, A.; Kawai, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3585.
(b) Shimizu, M.; Kamiya, M.; Hachiya, I. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 1456. (c)
Shimizu, M.; Kurokawa, H.; Takahashi, A. Lett. Org. Chem. 2004, 1, 353.
(d) Shimizu, M.; Yamauchi, C.; Ogawa, T. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 606. (e)
Shimizu, M.; Nishi, T. Synlett 2004, 889. (f) Shimizu, M.; Nishi, T.;
Yamamoto, A. Synlett 2003, 1469. (g) Shimizu, M.; Kamiya, M.; Hachiya,
I. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 606. (h) Shimizu, M.; Nishi, T. Chem. Lett. 2002,
46. (i) Shimizu, M.; Ogawa, T.; Nishi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5463.
(j) Shimizu, M.; Morita, A.; Kaga, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8401.
(5) For example, benzophenone was obtained from the reaction below.
results suggested that use of a weak acid and a proton source
would promote the double-nucleophilic addition.4i Indeed,
the reaction in the presence of Ti(OiPr)4 and molecular sieves
4Å containing 1 equiv of water gave the desired 1,4- and
1,2-addition product 2aa in 63% yield.
Among the promoters examined, silica gel was found to
be the most effective.9 The double-nucleophilic addition
reactions were next carried out using various ketene silyl
acetals under the optimized conditions, and the results are
summarized in Table 1. The use of ketene silyl acetals
(6) (a) Tomioka, K.; Shioya, Y.; Nagaoka, Y.; Yamada, K. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 7051. (b) Tomioka, K.; Okamoto, T.; Kanai, M.; Yamataka, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1891.
(7) Calculations were carried out using the SPARTAN pro program and
optimization with 6-31G*.
(8) The difference in the method of calculation (HF/STO-3G, and PM3)
has little influence on a qualitative conclusion.
3978
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 18, 2008