C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
with the beneficial effect of aryl substitutents.7 Stronger preference
for the concerted mechanisms can be expected for more electron-
withdrawing substituents on the alkyne.
In summary we have shown that highly functionalized 3-hydroxy-
pyridines can be directly obtained from R,R-dicyanoalkenes 6 with
excellent yield, chemoselectivity, and complete regiocontrol. DFT
calculations clearly report concerted Diels-Alder-type mechanisms
being operative for alkynes and dicyanoalkenes 6 in this novel
1-azadiene cycloaddition. These findings are expected to facilitate the
exploration of 3-hydroxypyridines in materials, synthesis, and medicinal
chemistry.
Acknowledgment. Funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft (Emmy-Noether young investigator grants JA1072/4-1 to T.J.,
and AR493/1-1 and -2 to H.D.A.) and the Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie (to T.J. and H.D.A.) is most gratefully acknowledged. We
thank Dr. J. N. Harvey (U Bristol, U.K.) for discussions and for
assistance with computer code.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
characterization data, X-ray structure determination of a derivative of
compound 10b, computational methodology, and computed energies
and coordinates for all reactant and TS structures. This material is
Figure 2. Structures of reactants and transition states 14 and 22 with
annotated distances and NBO charges (red, -0.50 f blue, +0.50).
leading to 15, the stepwise process for C-C bond formation (16) was
lower than the concerted barrier (14). The MECP linking the closed-
shell singlet surface to the open-shell singlet surface (MECP-1) was
essentially isoenergetic to TS 16. Diradical intermediates 17 were found
metastable, but the MECP linking the open-shell surface of 17 to the
closed shell-surface of 15 (MECP-2) was prohibitively high in energy
(Table 3).
We investigated pathways leading to five- and four-membered rings
(18, 19); however, preliminary results on nonfully optimized structures
suggest that these processes are prohibitive. Thus, 12 (+35.2 kcal/
mol) and 14 (+30.4 kcal/mol) are deemed the most likely processes
to reach products 13 and 15, respectively. Considering the inherent
uncertainty of barrier heights and the omission of thermal corrections
(≈5 kcal/mol), our results agree well with the observed moderate
selectivity for A.7
References
(1) Recent examples: (a) Dediu, O. G.; Yehia, N. A. M.; Oeser, T.; Polborn,
K.; Mu¨ller, T. J. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1834. (b) Craig, D.; Henry,
G. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2559. (c) McCormick, M. M.; Duong,
H. A.; Zuo, G.; Louie, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5030. (d) Senaiar,
R. S.; Young, D. D.; Deiters, A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1313. (e)
Movassaghi, M.; Hill, M. D.; Ahmad, O. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
10096. (f) Dash, J.; Lechel, T.; Reissig, H.-U. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5541.
(2) (a) Jones, G. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II; Mc Killop, A.
Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1996, Vol. 5, pp 167. (b)Spitzner, D. In
Science of Synthesis; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2004; p 11.
(3) Henry, G. D. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6043.
(4) (a) Serckx-Poncin, B.; Hesbain-Frisque, A. M.; Ghosez, L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1982, 23, 3261. (b) Pautet, F.; Nebois, P.; Bouaziz, Z.; Filion, H.
Heterocycles 2001, 54, 1095.
(5) Reviews: (a) Tietze, L. F.; Kettschau, G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 189, 1.
(b) Behforouz, M.; Ahmadian, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 5259. (c)
Jayakumar, S.; Ishar, M. P. S.; Mahajan, M. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 379.
(6) (a) Igarashi, J.-e.; Kawakami, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Furukawa, S. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1990, 38, 1832. (b) Fletcher, M. D.; Hurst, T. E.; Miles, T. J.; Moody,
C. J. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5454.
For reaction B (1d + 6a), concerted 20 (+33.9 kcal/mol) and
concerted-asynchronous 22 (+21.7 kcal/mol) were the lowest energy
pathways. TS calculations leading to the corresponding diradicals either
relaxed into Diels-Alder type TS 22 or were ≈10 kcal/mol higher
(23) than concerted process barriers. In contrast to the study on reaction
A, the activation barriers 20 and 22 were distinctly different (∆∆E‡
≈ 10 kcal/mol), fully consistent with the experiment. On the other
hand the net energy gain along the reaction coordinate was found to
be small (0 to -3 kcal/mol). Microscopic reversibility thus suggests
that the initial cycloadducts 21 and 7a should be in equilibrium with
the starting materials. In a scenario where CN-elimination precedes
aromatization, 7a is hence expected to easily convert to 8a and drive
the equilibrium assisted by the adjacent R-N lone pair (Figure 1B).
This agrees well with the observed regiospecificity.
Computational evidence for stepwise polar mechanisms was never
secured for reactions A and B, in line with the neutral reaction
conditions and negligible solvent effects.7 In fact we note that solvation
does not appear to play much of a role since vacuum energies lead to
the same conclusions (Table 3). When comparing the preferred TSs,
both 14 and 22 are clearly asynchronous with substantially longer C-N
than C-C distances (Figure 2). Mulliken charges and natural bond
order (NBO) analysis of 22 both show matching azadiene and
dienophile polarity. Although the forward barriers out of 20 were found
prohibitive, a partial opening of the diradical pathway would agree
(7) Lu, J.-Y.; Arndt, H.-D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4205.
(8) de Lucchi, O.; Modena, G. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2585.
(9) Zhang, B.; Zhu, X.-Q.; Lu, J.-Y.; He, J.; Wang, P. G.; Cheng, J.-P. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 3295.
(10) (a) Sain, B.; Sandhu, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2545. (b) Hopf, H.;
Kreutzer, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 393. (c) Tietze, L. F.;
Henrich, M.; Niklaus, A.; Buback, M. Chem.sEur. J. 1999, 5, 297.
(11) Lu, J.-Y.; Shen, W.-Z.; Preut, H.; Arndt, H.-D. Acta Cryst., E 2008, 64,
o602.
(12) Review: Kappe, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250.
(13) (a) Traˆn Huu Daˆu, M. E.; Flament, J.-P.; Lefour, J.-M.; Riche, C.; Grierson,
D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2343. (b) Bachrach, S. M.; Liu, M. J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6736. (c) Tietze, L. F.; Fennen, J.; Geiꢀler, H.; Schulz,
G.; Anders, E. Liebigs Ann. 1995, 1681. (d) Park, Y. S.; Lee, B.-S.; Lee,
I. New. J. Chem. 1999, 23, 707.
(14) Boger, D. L.; Corbett, W. L.; Curran, T. T.; Kaspar, A. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 1713.
(15) Domingo, L. R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3765.
(16) Calculations utilized unrestricted and restricted DFT (B3LYP hybrid
functional. Jaguar, version 7.0; Schro¨dinger LLC: New York, 2007). Initial
geometry and vibrational frequencies were computed with mixed 6-31G**/
midi! basis sets to confirm intermediates. Geometries were then optimized
with the full 6-31G** basis set. Single point energies on these geometries
were calculated with the 6-311G**+ basis set. DMF solvent was treated
implicitly by Jaguar’s Poisson-Boltzmann continuum solver (ꢀ ) 36.7 and
r ) 2.49 Å) with the 6-311G** basis set. Colored graphics were created
with VMD, see: Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. J. Mol. Graphics
1996, 14, 33.
(17) For a discussion and historical perspective on cycloaddition mechanisms
see: Houk, K. N.; Gonza´les, J.; Li, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 81.
(18) Harvey, J. N.; Aschi, M.; Schwarz, H.; Koch, W. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1998,
99, 95.
JA804078V
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 40, 2008 13221