Communication
ChemComm
as electrophiles, no homo-coupling products were obtained. For- Peking University) is acknowledged for his contribution to a
mation of carbanion 10 was confirmed by 1H NMR analysis. part of this work.
N-Fluorenyl imine 2a was treated with a stoichiometric amount
of KN(SiMe3)2 at ambient temperature in THF-d8 to form carbanion
Notes and references
10. There are two key protons in 2a, observed by 1H NMR analysis,
´
´
1 A. Viso, R. Fernandez de la Pradilla, M. Tortosa, A. Garcıa and
A. Flores, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, PR1–PR42.
at d 8.83 and d 5.41, and one reacted with the base to form 10,
whose remaining proton was observed at d 8.54. These results
suggest that the anion of 10 is located on the fluorenyl group
stabilized by the 14p electron system. The deprotonation step was
2 P. J. De Clercq, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1755–1792.
3 F. Machrouhi and J. L. Namy, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 40, 1315–1318.
4 T. Imamoto and S. Nishimura, Chem. Lett., 1990, 19, 1141–1142.
5 K. Takaki, Y. Tsubaki, S. Tanaka, F. Beppu and Y. Fujiwara, Chem.
Lett., 1990, 19, 203–204.
1
very fast and no intermediate was observed by H NMR analysis.
We further conducted the deprotonation using other bases such as
KOCH2CF3, and KOtBu, and the same results were obtained.
Formation of 10 was also observed from aminoalkane 11 and a
base. Namely, 11 was treated with a base at ambient temperature in
THF-d8 to form the same carbanion 10. The formation of 10 was
also very fast and no intermediate was observed by 1H NMR
6 T. Nishino, Y. Nishiyama and N. Sonoda, Heteroat. Chem., 2002, 13,
131–135.
7 M. Shimizu and Y. Niwa, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2829–2832.
8 S. Talukdar and A. Banerji, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 3468–3470.
9 S. Okamoto, J.-Q. He, C. Ohno, Y. Oh-iwa and Y. Kawaguchi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 387–390.
´
10 M. Soueidan, F. Helion, J.-L. Namy and J. Szymoniak, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2011, 52, 1348–1350.
analysis. It is assumed that the benzylic anion formed from 11 11 N. Kalyanam and G. V. Rao, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 1647–1648.
¨
ˇ
¨
¨
12 E. Vellemae, O. Tsubrik, S. Maeorg and U. Maeorg, J. Chem. Res.,
2006, 149–150.
and a base tautomerized to 10 immediately.
As already mentioned, 10 reacted with DPP imines or Boc
13 R. D. Rieke and S.-H. Kim, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 5235–5239.
imines at the benzylic position to make carbon–carbon bonds (3). 14 E. A. Mistryukov, Mendeleev Commun., 2002, 12, 230–231.
15 M. Shimizu, I. Suzuki and H. Makino, Synlett, 2003, 1635–1638.
On the other hand, while chalcone also reacted with 10 at the
16 (a) C. Betschart and D. Seebach, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1987, 70,
benzylic position (13), benzyl bromide reacted with 10 at the other
2215–2231; (b) P. Mangeney, T. Tejero, A. Alexakis, F. Grosjean
position (12) exclusively. The origin of the difference in the regio-
selectivity is not clear at this stage and is under investigation.32
In conclusion, we have developed the first catalytic imine–imine
cross-coupling reaction, which proceeds under mild conditions to
afford 1,2-diamines in high yields with high diastereoselectivities.
Distinguishing features of this novel reaction are as follows: (1) only
and J. Normant, Synthesis, 1988, 255–256; (c) A. Fu¨rstner and
´
B. Bogdanovic, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 2442–2469.
17 (a) Y. Gao, Y. Yoshida and F. Sato, Synlett, 1997, 1353–1354. For zirconium-
imine complexes, see: (b) S. L. Buchwald, B. T. Watson, M. W.
Wannamaker and J. C. Dewan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 4486–4494.
18 D. Seebach, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1979, 18, 239–258.
19 M. Takamura, Y. Hamashima, H. Usuda, M. Kanai and
M. Shibasaki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 1650–1652.
a catalytic amount of a base is required; (2) only cross-coupling 20 S. Nakamura, N. Sato, M. Sugimoto and T. Toru, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2004, 15, 1513–1516.
21 M. Hatano, Y. Hattori, Y. Furuya and K. Ishihara, Org. Lett., 2009, 11,
occurs and no homo-coupling products are obtained; and (3) high
yields and high stereoselectivity are realized even when aliphatic
2321–2324.
imines are used. Asymmetric catalysis was also achieved using a 22 A. M. Seayad, B. Ramalingam, K. Yoshinaga, T. Nagata and
C. L. L. Chai, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 264–267.
23 S. Kobayashi, R. Yazaki, K. Seki and Y. Yamashita, Angew. Chem., Int.
chiral nonmetal catalyst, and the reaction was successfully applied
to the synthesis of a biologically important b-lactam. Moreover, the
Ed., 2008, 47, 5613–5615.
key carbanion 10 formed from N-fluorenyl imine 2a and a base was 24 Y. J. Chen, K. Seki, Y. Yamashita and S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1
2010, 132, 3244–3245.
25 R. Rahmani, M. Matsumoto, Y. Yamashita and S. Kobayashi, Chem.
characterized by H NMR analysis and was found to react with
another imine at the benzylic position to afford the cross-coupling
– Asian J., 2012, 7, 1191–1194.
product. It was also confirmed that the same carbanion 10 was 26 Y. Yamashita, M. Matsumoto, Y.-J. Chen and S. Kobayashi, Tetra-
hedron, 2012, 68, 7558–7563.
27 First report on property of a-proton of a flurorenylidene imine:
formed from aminoalkane 11. A synthetic advantage of the present
cross-coupling reactions is that various commercially available
M. J. O’Donnell, W. D. Bennett, W. A. Bruder, W. N. Jacobsen,
aldehydes can be used as starting materials, and that various
1,2-diamines, some of which could not be synthesized from
amino alkanes, can be prepared in high yields with high
diastereoselectivities. It should be noted from a viewpoint of
organic reactions that unprecedented catalytic imine–imine
cross-coupling reactions have been accomplished. Further inves-
tigations utilizing the key carbanion 10 for other synthetic
reactions are now under way in our laboratories.
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Science Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of
Science (JSPS), the Global COE Program, The University of
Tokyo, MEXT, Japan, and the Japan Science Technology Agency
(JST). Mr. Zhiyao Zhou (a UTRIP (short stay) student from
K. Knuth, B. LeClef, R. L. Polt, F. G. Bordwell, S. R. Mrozack and
T. A. Cripe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 8520–8525.
28 (a) T. Isobe, K. Fukuda and T. Ishikawa, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65,
7770–7773; (b) T. Isobe, K. Fukuda, T. Tokunaga, H. Seki,
K. Yamaguchi and T. Ishikawa, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 7774–7778;
(c) T. Isobe, K. Fukuda, K. Yamaguchi, H. Seki, T. Tokunaga and
T. Ishikawa, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 7779–7785.
29 Simple N-fluorenyl imines did not react with Boc- or DPP-imines in the
presence of chiral guanidine 4, presumable because of low basicity of 4.
30 The activity of 3-amino-b-lactam: J. N. Wells and O. R. Tarwater,
J. Pharm. Sci., 1971, 60, 156–157.
31 Reference of synthetic procedure: S. Guizzetti, M. Benaglia,
M. Bonsignore and L. Raimondi, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 739–743.
32 During the preparation of this manuscript, enantioselective aryla-
tion of N-fluorenyl imines were reported. Y. Zhu and S. L. Buchwald,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 4500–4503. See also: X. Liu, A. Gao,
L. Ding, J. Xu and B. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 2118–2121.
13044 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 13041--13044
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014