Iron pentacarbonyl assisted photochemical route to 2,5- and 2,6-divinyl-substituted 1,4-benzoquinones from 1-ene-3-ynes

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.059

Photochemical reaction between the enynes, (Z)-1-methoxybut-1-ene-3-yne, 1 or isopropenyl acetylene, 2 with CO in presence of Fe(CO)₅ yields the 2,6- and 2,5-divinyl-substituted 1,4-benzoquinones: 2,6-bis{(Z)-2-methoxyvinyl}-1,4-benzoquinone (3

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.059

Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 8943–8946
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Tetrahedron
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tet
Iron pentacarbonyl assisted photochemical route to 2,5- and 2,6-divinyl-
substituted 1,4-benzoquinones from 1-ene-3-ynes
,
b
,
a
b
Pradeep Mathur a , Vidya D. Avasare , Shaikh M. Mobin
*
a Chemistry Department, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, Powai, Bombay 400076, India
b National Single Crystal X-Ray Diffraction Facility, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, Powai, Bombay 400076, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Photochemical reaction between the enynes, (Z)-1-methoxybut-1-ene-3-yne, 1 or isopropenyl acetylene,
2 with CO in presence of Fe(CO)5 yields the 2,6- and 2,5-divinyl-substituted 1,4-benzoquinones:
2,6-bis{(Z)-2-methoxyvinyl}-1,4-benzoquinone (3, 42%), 2,5-bis{(Z)-2-methoxyvinyl}-1,4-benzoquinone
Received 25 March 2008
Received in revised form 13 June 2008
Accepted 16 June 2008
(4, 31.5%), [{h2
,h
2:2,6-di(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,4-benzoquinone}tricarbonyliron] (5, 45%), and {h2
,
h
2:2,5-
Available online 20 June 2008
di(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,4-benzoquinone}tricarbonyliron] (6, 65%).
Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Benzoquinone
Vinyl-substituted
Ene-yne
Iron carbonyl
Photochemical
1. Introduction
by treatment of isolated acetylenic alcohol with HClO4 or with
a PTSA gives dihydropyrane.14 Organometallic chemistry of some
metal complexes of isopropenyl acetylene (IPA) 2 (Fig. 1) has been
reported; thermal reaction of Co2(CO)8 with 2 leads to cyclo-
trimerization of the ligand to give the 2,4,6-substituted benzene.15
Alkynes and alkenes exhibit a rich organometallic chemistry. In
recent times, there has been much interest in organometallic
chemistry of polyenes and polyenynes.1–13 Although several ex-
amples exist of metal ene-yne complexes, their chemistry, in
general, has been much less studied than that of metal alkynes and
metal alkene complexes.
The ene-yne, (Z)-1-methoxybut-1-ene-3-yne, 1 (Fig. 1) has been
used in a number of interesting organic transformations. For in-
stance, addition of lithium acetylide of 1 to lactones followed by
acid hydrolysis yields dihydropyrone spiroketal systems, while
addition of inactivated aldehydes to the lithium salt of 1 followed
Isopropenyl acetylide cluster Cp WRe2(CO)9(m3-h
2-IPA) reacts with
*
methanol to form an open chain complex bridged by OMe.16 Re-
action of (Cp)2Mo2(CO)4 with lithiated isopropenyl acetylide fol-
lowed by acidic hydrolysis gives a carbyne–vinylidine derivative
and Cp2Mo3(CO)4(m3-h
2-IPA).17
Previously, we have reported photochemical reactions between
Fe(CO)5 and ferrocenylacetylene, which yield ferrocenyl substituted
quinones.18,19 Our continuing interest in metal mediated prepara-
tion of quinones results from the existing vast synthetic utility of
benzoquinones on the one hand and their biological significance on
the other. Benzoquinones primin, verapliquinone A, B, shikonin,
and alkanin are used as skin sensitizer and human telomerase
inhibitors.20,21 Asterriquinones have been recognized for their anti-
HIV properties and are used as anti-diabetic agents.22 Compounds
containing the benzoquinone moiety have several applications in
dye and pharmaceutical industries and their electrochemical
properties are of significance in materials science. For a synthetic
chemist, use of quinones as dienophiles in Diels–Alder reactions
and in synthesis of chiral derivatives is very important.23 Naturally
occurring 1,4-benzoquinones mainly have a nucleus functionalized
at 2,5 positions.24 However, reports of facile one-pot synthesis of
2,5-disubstituted-1,4-benzoquinones are limited.25
R2
H
R1
1; R1 = OMe, R2 = H
2; R1 = H, R2 = Me
Figure 1.
* Corresponding author. Chemistry Department, Indian Institute of Technology-
Bombay, Powai, Bombay 400076, India. Tel.: þ91 22 25767180; fax: þ91 22
25767152.
E-mail address: mathur@iitb.ac.in (P. Mathur).
0040-4020/$ – see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.059

8944
P. Mathur et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 8943–8946
O
O
Me
O
H
Fe(CO)5
THF, - 10 °C, hν
+
CO
+
O
O
O
O
Me
Me
Me
Me
O
O
1
3
4
Me
Me
O
O
Me
Fe(CO)5
THF, - 10 °C, hν
Me
+
+
CO
H
Me
Fe
Fe
(CO)3
(CO)3
O
O
2
5
6
Scheme 1.
In this paper, we report a photochemically promoted one-step
synthesis of 1,4-benzoquinones, which bear vinyl substituents in
2,5- and 2,6-position.
atoms being bent by about 8ꢀ out of the carbocyclic diene plane. A
Fe(CO)3 unit is attached in h2 2 fashion with the cis-diene system,
:h
which comprises a double bond of the ring and the olefinic bond of
one of the isopropenyl substituents. Consequently, the double bond
of the isopropenyl group, which is part of the cis-diene unit and is
coordinated to the iron atom, C(4)–C(5)¼1.422(3) Å, is lengthened
with respect to the double bond of the uncoordinated isopropenyl
group, C(11)–C(12)¼1.336(4) Å. Similarly, the quinonoid ring double
bond, which is coordinated, C(7)–C(8)¼1.445(3) Å, is longer than
the uncoordinated double bond of the ring, C(10)–C(14)¼1.352(3) Å.
Whereas the original stereochemistry of (Z)-1-methoxy-1-butene-
3-yne is retained during the formation of 3 and 4, use of a non-
geometrically isomeric 2-methyl-1-butene-3-yne gives compounds
5 and 6 in which the two substituents on the benzoquinone ring
adopt cis and trans geometries, the cis geometry of one of the
isopropenyl substituents in each compound resulting from the
presence of the coordinated Fe(CO)3 group. Indeed, the diene–
Fe(CO)3 groups in 5 and 6 are very stable; attempts to demetallate
under thermal and oxidizing conditions have been unsuccessful.26
Although the exact mechanism of formation of 3–6 is not known
at present, some parallels can be drawn from the related photo-
chemical preparation of diferrocenyl-1,4-benzoquinones. In the
reaction of Fe(CO)5 with ferrocenylacetylene in presence of CO, the
ferrole, Fe(CO)4{(CO)2HCCFc} (7) (Fig. 4), is formed. Compound 7 is
2. Results and discussion
Low temperature photolysis of THF solution containing Fe(CO)5
and ene-yne 1 or 2 with a constant bubbling of CO through the
solution leads to a rapid formation of the vinyl-substituted com-
pounds 3/4 and 5/6, respectively (Scheme 1).
Compounds 3–6 were characterized by IR, 1H NMR, and mass
spectral methods, and their compositions were confirmed by
elemental analysis. The infrared and NMR spectra of 3 were similar
to that of 4 and likewise, the spectral features observed for 5 were
similarly present in the spectra of 6. The IR spectra confirmed the
presence of ketone carbonyl in all four compounds, and of termi-
nally bonded metal carbonyls in 5 and 6. 1H NMR spectra of all are
consistent with the presence of
a 2,6-substituted and 2,5-
substituted 1,4-benzoquinone ring, the presence of equivalent
methoxyvinyl groups in 3 and 4, and of two non-equivalent
substituents in each of 5 and 6. In order to unequivocally establish
the identity of the new compounds, molecular structure de-
terminations by single crystal X-ray diffraction methods were
carried out on two representative compounds, 3 and 6.
Molecular structure of 3 (Fig. 2) consists of a 1,4-benzoquinone
ring with methoxyvinyl substituents at 2- and 6-position. The bond
metricals are within expected values. Notably, methoxyvinyl sub-
stituents are in syn orientation. The molecular structure of 6 (Fig. 3)
has isopropenyl substituents at 2- and 5-position of the 1,4-ben-
zoquinone ring. In contrast to the planar quinone ring in 3, the one
in 6 has a bowed conformation with the oxygen-bearing carbon
Figure 3. ORTEP view of the molecular structure of 6 with 50% probability. Selected
bond distances (Å) and bond angles (ꢀ), C(4)–C(5)¼1.422(3), C(5)–C(6)¼1.510(3), C(5)–
C(7)¼1.416(3), C(7)–C(8)¼1.445(3), C(8)–C(9)¼1.462(3), C(9)–O(4)¼1.225(3), C(10)–
C(14)¼1.352(3), C(10)–C(11)¼1.472(3), C(11)–C(12)¼1.336(4), C(11)–C(13)¼1.499(3),
Fe(1)–C(4)¼2.131(2), Fe(1)–C(5)¼2.095(2), Fe(1)–C(7)¼2.049(2), Fe(1)–C(8)¼2.106(2),
C(10)–C(11)–C(12)¼122.1(2), C(10)–C(11)–C(13)¼117.2(2).
Figure 2. ORTEP view of the molecular structure of 3 with 50% probability. Selected
bond distances (Å) and bond angles (ꢀ): C1–O1¼1.451(4), C2–C3¼1.332(5),
C2–O1¼1.347(4), C3–C4¼1.445(4), C4–C5¼1.355(5), C4–C9¼1.499(4), C5–C6¼1.461(4),
C6–O2¼1.243(3), C(3)–C(4)–C(5)¼126.2(3), C(3)–C(4)–C(9)¼115.6(3), C(2)–C(3)–
C(4)¼128.6(3).

P. Mathur et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 8943–8946
8945
O
O
In summary, we have demonstrated a one-pot synthesis of
vinyl-substituted 1,4-benzoquinone derivatives by employing iron
pentacarbonyl as a template in presence of carbon monoxide. Sig-
nificantly, formation of the 2,6- and 2,5-disubstituted derivatives is
easily understood, and therefore, our method of synthesis may find
general utility in the rational design of vinyl-substituted quinone
derivatives.
Fc
Fe(CO)4
Figure 4. The ferrole, 7 formed from photolysis of ferrocenylacetylene and Fe(CO)5 in
presence of CO.
sufficiently stable to have been isolated and its molecular structure
to have been determined crystallographically. Further, exchange of
the Fe(CO)4 group of 7 by a second ferrocenylacetylene molecule
was demonstrated, resulting in the formation of 2,5- and 2,6-
diferrocenyl-1,4-benzoquinone.
3. Experimental section
3.1. General
It is quite likely that in our present reaction of 1 or 2 with
Fe(CO)5, an intermediate similar to 7, is initially formed, which
rapidly undergoes a Fe(CO)4/enyne exchange to form 3–6 (Scheme
2). Formation of two isomers, 3 and 4 can be thought to result from
two possible orientations of the second molecule of 1 as it
approaches to formally substitute the Fe(CO)4 group of the in-
termediate ferrole. Likewise, two uncoordinated precursors to 5
and 6 can be thought to form via an intermediacy of a ferrole
followed by two possibilities for a second enyne, 2, to substitute the
iron tetracarbonyl group (Scheme 3). In this reaction however, the
presence of iron carbonyl fragments in solution leads to co-
ordination of one Fe(CO)3 group to a cis-diene system formed from
the double bond of one of the isopropenyl substituents and one of
the two ring double bonds.
Reactions and manipulations were performed using standard
Schlenk techniques under argon with a slightly positive pressure.
Photochemical reactions were carried out in cold double-walled
quartz vessel having a 125-W immersion type mercury lamp
manufactured by Applied Photophysics Ltd. Infrared spectra were
recorded on Nicolet Impact 400 FT spectrometer as hexane solu-
tions in 0.1 mm path length of NaCl cells and NMR spectra on
Varian VXRO-400S spectrometer in CDCl3. Elemental analysis was
performed on a Carlo-Erba automatic analyzer. Iron pentacarbonyl
was purchased from Fluka. (Z)-1-Methoxy-2-butene-3-yne was
purchased from Aldrich and isopropenyl acetylene was purchased
from Merck. All compounds were used without further purification.
Solvents were purchased from Merck and used after purification
and drying under argon atmosphere.
O
C
MeO
MeO
MeO
Fe(CO)5
- CO
CO
Fe(CO)4
Fe(CO)4
C
O
1
O
C
O
MeO
MeO
OMe
(CO)4Fe
O
C
O
O
- Fe(CO)4
- Fe(CO)4
MeO
Me
Me
1
C
O
O
3
Fe(CO)4
C
O
O
C
O
Me
O
Ferrole
(CO)4Fe
O
OMe
Me
C
O
O
4
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism of formation of 3 and 4. ¼Bond cleavage. —————¼New bond formation.
O
Me
Me
Me
C
Fe(CO)5
- CO
CO
Fe(CO)4
Fe(CO)4
C
O
2
O
C
Me
O
Me
Me
Me
Me
(CO)4Fe
Fe
- CO
- CO
O
C
(CO)3
Me
C
O
O
5
Me
2
Fe(CO)4
O
C
C
O
O
Me
(CO)4Fe
Ferrole
Fe
(CO)3
C
O
O
6
Me
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism of formation of 5 and 6. ¼Bond cleavage. —————¼New bond formation.

8946
P. Mathur et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 8943–8946
3.1.1. Preparation of 2,6-bis{(Z)-2-methoxyvinyl}-1,4-benzoquinone
(3) and 2,5-bis{(Z)-2-methoxyvinyl}-1,4-benzoquinone (4)
To a solution of compound 1 (0.205 g, 2.5 mmol) in THF (70 ml),
Fe(CO)5 (0.60 g, 3.1 mmol) was added. Reaction mixture was
subjected to photolysis for 15 min at ꢁ10 ꢀC in a photochemical
reaction vessel with continuous bubbling of CO through the solu-
tion. After removal of the volatiles, the residue was extracted with
dichloromethane and passed through a Celite pad to remove in-
soluble material. Filtrate was concentrated and subjected to chro-
matographic work-up on silica gel TLC plates. Elution with
a dichloromethane and n-hexane (85:15 v/v) mixture yielded two
major bands: reddish orange band of compound 3 (Rf 0.67) and
yellowish orange band of compound 4 (Rf 0.33) along with few
minor bands.
thermal parameters. All hydrogen atoms were geometrically fixed
and allowed to refine using a riding model.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Department of Science and
Technology, Government of India. VDA is grateful to UGC, New
Delhi for a Teacher Fellowship.
Supplementary data
CCDC 681312 and 681313 contain the supplementary crystal-
lographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of
charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. Supplementary data associ-
ated with this article can be found in the online version, at
doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.059.
3: 60 mg (42%). IR (n
(CO), cmꢁ1, n-hexane): 1738 (s), 1643 (s),
1619 (vs), 1562 (vs), 1259 (vs), 1068 (vs). Mass (m/z)¼220 (Mþ). 1H
NMR (
d
, CDCl3): 6.80 (s, 2H, OCC]CH), 5.28 (d, J¼6 Hz, 2H,
HC]CHOCH3), 6.42 (d, J¼6 Hz, 2H, C]CHOCH3), 3.60 (s, 6H,
2–OCH3). Mp (ꢀC) 190–192. Found (calcd for C12H12O4): C 65.58
(65.45), H 5.6 (5.45).
4: 45 mg (31.5%). IR (n
(CO), cmꢁ1, n-hexane): 1740 (br), 1643 (s),
References and notes
1619 (vs), 1563 (vs), 1259 (vs), 1068 (vs). Mass (m/z)¼220 (Mþ). 1H
1. Antonova, A. B.; Bruce, M. I.; Ellis, B. G.; Gaudio, M.; Humphrey, P. A.; Jevric, M.;
Melino, G.; Nicholson, B. K.; Perkins, G. J.; Skelton, B. W.; Stapleton, B.; White,
A. H.; Zaitseva, N. N. Chem. Commun. 2004, 960.
2. Akita, M.; Sakurai, A.; Chung, M.; Moro-oka, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 670, 2.
3. Bruce, M. I.; Smith, M. E.; Zaitseva, N. N.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H. J. Orga-
nomet. Chem. 2003, 670, 170.
NMR (
d
, CDCl3): 6.8 (s, 2H, OCC]CH), 5.28 (d, J¼6 Hz, 2H,
HC]CHOCH3), 6.42, 6.42 (d, J¼6 Hz, 2H, C]CHOCH3), 3.6 (s, 6H, 2–
OCH3). Mp (ꢀC) 185–188. Found (calcd for C12H12O4): C 65.58
(65.45), H 5.6 (5.45).
4. Koentjoro, O. F.; Zuber, P.; Puschmann, H.; Goeta, A. E.; Howard, J. A. K.; Low, P. J.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 670, 178.
5. Lucas, N. T.; Notaras, E. G. A.; Cifuentes, M. P.; Humphrey, M. G. Organometallics
2003, 22, 284.
6. Lucas, N. T.; Notaras, E. G. A.; Petrie, S.; Stranger, R.; Humphrey, M. G. Organ-
ometallics 2003, 22, 708.
7. Notaras, E. G. A.; Lucas, N. T.; Humphrey, M. G.; Willis, A. C.; Rae, A. D. Organ-
ometallics 2003, 22, 3659.
8. Wadepohl, H.; Gebert, S.; Pritzkow, H.; Osella, D.; Nervi, C.; Fiedler, J. Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2000, 8, 1833.
9. Cabeza, J. A.; Grepioni, F.; Moreno, M.; Riera, V. Organometallics 2000, 19, 5424.
10. Adams, R. D.; Bunz, U. H. F.; Fu, W.; Kloppenburg, L.; Qu, B. Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 2, 1.
11. Gallop, M. A.; Gomez-Sal, M. P.; Housecroft, C. E.; Johnson, B. F. G.; Lewis, J.;
Owen, S. M.; Raithby, P. R.; Wright, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2502.
12. Savignac, M.; Jaouen, G.; Rodger, C. A.; Perrier, R. E.; Sayer, B. G.; McGlinchey,
M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2328.
13. Kitamura, T.; Joh, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 65, 235.
14. Crimmins, M. T.; Bankaitis, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4551.
15. (a) Koji, M.; Tomoni, Y.; Fumiaki, N.; Kouichi, O.; Sakae, U. J. Organomet. Chem.
2002, 465, 228; (b) Giordano, R.; Sappa, E.; Predieri. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 228,
139.
3.1.2. Preparation of [{h2
,
h
2:2,6-di(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,4-
2:2,5-di(prop-
benzoquinone}tricarbonyliron] (5) and [{h2
,
h
1-en-2-yl)-1,4-benzoquinone}tricarbonyliron] (6)
To a solution of compound 2 (0.165 g, 2.5 mmol) in THF (70 ml),
Fe(CO)5 (0.60 g, 3.1 mmol) was added. Reaction mixture was sub-
jected to photolysis for 15 min at ꢁ10 ꢀC in a photochemical re-
action vessel with continuous bubbling of CO through the solution.
After removal of the volatiles, the residue was extracted with
dichloromethane and passed through a Celite pad to remove in-
soluble material. Filtrate was concentrated and subjected to chro-
matographic work-up on silica gel TLC plates. Elution with
a dichloromethane and n-hexane (85:15 v/v) mixture yielded two
yellow bands, compounds 5 (Rf 0.55) and 6 (Rf 0.4).
5: 92 mg (45%). IR (
1980 (vs), 1742 (br), 1740 (br), 1652 (s), 1613 (br). Mass (m/z)¼328
(Mþ), 66. 1H NMR (
, CDCl3): 6.62 (s, 1H, OCC]CH Fe), 6.28 (s, 1H,
n
(CO), cmꢁ1, n-hexane): 2060 (s), 2012 (vw),
d
16. Peng, J. J.; Horng, K. M.; Cheng, P. S.; Chi, Y.; Peng, S. M.; Lee, G. Organometallics
1994, 13, 2365.
17. Froom, S. F. T.; Green, M.; Mercer, R. J.; Nagle, K. R.; Orpen, A. G.; Schwiegk, J.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 1666.
18. Mathur, P.; Singh, A. K.; Singh, V. K.; Singh, P.; Rahul, R.; Mobin, S. M.; Tho¨ne, C.
Organometallics 2005, 243, 4793.
19. Mathur, P.; Singh, V. K.; Mobin, S. M.; Tho¨ne, C. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691,
3336; Organometallics 2004, 23, 3694.
20. (a) Ling, T.; Poupon, E.; Rueden, E. J.; Kim, S. H.; Theodorakis, E. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 12261; (b) Stahl, P.; Kissau, L.; Mazitschek, R.; Giannis, A.;
Waldmann, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1174; (c) Oh, M.; Carpenter, G. B.;
Sweigart, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 1.
21. (a) Devis, C. J.; Hurst, T. E.; Jacob, A. M.; Moody, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4415;
(b) Lu, Q.; Liu, W.; Ding, J.; Cai, J.; Duan, W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12,
1375; (c) Deng, X.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7703; (d) Pirrung,
M. C.; Li, Z.; Park, K.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7919; (e) Tatsuta, K.; Mukai,
H.; Mitsumoto, K. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54, 105.
OCC]CH), 5.19–5.24 (m, 4H, CH3C]CH2Fe and CH3C]CH2), 2.62 (s,
3H, CH3C]CHFe), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3C]CH). Mp (ꢀC) 144–146 (dec).
Found (calcd for C15H12O5Fe): C 54.98 (54.88), H 3.6 (3.01).
6: 134 mg (65%). IR (n
(CO), cmꢁ1, n-hexane): 2060 (s), 2012 (vw),
1998 (vs), 1740 (br), 1643 (s), 1619 (vs), 1562 (vs), 1259 (vs), 1068
(vs). Mass (m/z)¼328 (Mþ). 1H NMR (
d, CDCl3): 6.62 (s, 1H, OCC]CH
Fe), 6.28 (s, 1H, OCC]CH), 5.20–5.24 (m, 4H, CH3C]CH2Fe and
CH3C]CH2), 2.62 (s, 3H, CH3CCHFe), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3C]CH). Mp
(ꢀC) 132–134 (dec). Anal. Found (calcd for C15H12O5Fe): C 55.02
(54.88), H 3.2 (3.01).
3.2. Crystal structure determination of 3 and 6
22. (a) Beagley, B.; Curtis, A. D.; Pritchard, R. G.; Stoodley, R. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 1981; (b) Brimble, M. A.; MacEwan, J. F.; Turner, P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1239; (c) Brimble, M. A.; Duncalf, L. J.; Reid, D. C. W.;
Roberts, T. R. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 5363.
23. Oppolzer, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 876.
24. Thomson, R. H. Naturally Occurring Quinones; Academic: New York, NY, 1971.
25. (a) Moore, H. W.; Sing, Y. L.; Sidhu, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 3321; (b)
Rameshkumar, C.; Periasamy, M. Organometallics 2000, 19, 2401; (c) Liebeskind,
L. S.; Riesinger, S. W. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 408.
26. Coquerel, Y. Synlett 2002, 1937 In our attempts we have used ceric ammonium
nitrate, triethylamine as well as iodine (25.6 mg, 0.01 mmol).
27. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX 97, Program for Crystal Structure Solution and Refinement;
University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, 1997.
Suitable X-ray quality crystals of 3 and 6 were grown by
slow evaporation of dichloromethane and n-hexane solvent mix-
ture at 5 ꢀC and X-ray crystallographic data were collected
from single crystal samples of 3 (0.25ꢂ0.17ꢂ0.15 mm3) and 6
(0.43ꢂ0.28ꢂ0.23 mm3) mounted on a glass fibers. Oxford diffrac-
tion XCALIBUR-S CCD was used for the cell determination and
intensity data collection for compounds 3 and 6 .The structures
were solved by direct methods (SHELXS) and refined by full-matrix
least squares against F2 using SHELXL-97 (SHELX-TL for 1) soft-
ware.27 Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic