1516
J. Patole et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 1514–1517
lipid biosynthesis processes.18 On comparing the
100
80
60
40
20
0
26
ClogP19 values of PAS (0.71) with L5 (4.62), the Schiff
base side chain in the new derivatives clearly contributes
substantially in enhancing the liposolubility of the par-
ent compound thereby facilitating the entry of these
molecules through lipid-enriched bacterial cell wall.20
31
26
27
33
29
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
Interestingly, the HPLC analysis of the culture filtrates
showed no increased accumulation of salicylic acid (re-
sults not shown), suggesting the probable mechanism
of action of these compounds is not through blocking
the conversion of salicylate into mycobactin or carbox-
ymycobactin. In this connection, there have been prior
reports indicating that the orthohydroxy Schiff bases
of isoniazid had higher antimycobacterial activity than
isoniazid where the enhanced activity was attributed to
radical scavenging activity of the compound.21 It is
likely a similar mechanism may be operating in case of
the compounds described here.
COMPOUNDS (µM)
Figure 1. Antimycobacterial activities of the Schiff base conjugates of
PAS (L1–L6) against Mycobacterium bovisBCG.
120
182
171
311
244
100
80
60
40
20
0
335
389
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
PAS conjugates containing hydroxyl-rich Schiff base li-
gands have enhanced antimycobacterial activities
against M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG that may be
useful in developing new and potent antimycobacterial
agents.
COMPOUNDS (µM)
Figure 2. Antimycobacterial activity of the Schiff base conjugates of
PAS (L1–L6) against Mycobacterium smegmatis.
hence is normally employed for the rapid screening
of antitubercular compounds.14 It also has similar
rates of homologous recombination to M. tuberculosis.15
M. smegmatis, unlike M. tuberculosis or BCG, has a
second route of iron uptake that does not involve
salicylic acid3 and, consequently, is considerably less
sensitive to PAS than are the pathogenic mycobacteria.7
M. bovis BCG resembles M. tuberculosis being a slow-
growing pathogen16 and has 99.9% similarity of DNA
sequences with that of M. tuberculosis.17
Acknowledgment
J.P. thank University of Pune (India) for the financial
assistance.
References and notes
1. Bottari, B.; Maccari, M.; Monfort, F.; Ottana, R.;
Rotndo, E.; Vigorita, M. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2001, 11, 301.
2. Sandbhor, U.; Padhye, S.; Billington, D.; Rathbone, D.;
Franzblau, S.; Anson, C. E.; Powell, A. K. J. Inorg.
Biochem. 2002, 90, 127.
3. Ratledge, C. Tuberculosis 2004, 84, 110.
4. De Voss, J. J.; Rutter, K.; Schroeder, B. G.; Su, H.; Zhu,
Y., ; Barry, C. E., III Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000,
97, 1252.
5. Chipperfield, J. R.; Ratledge, C. Biometals 2000, 13, 165.
6. Brown, K. A.; Ratledge, C. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975,
385, 207.
In the present study, all the susceptibility testing do not
include the actual MICs, but we have noted the percent
inhibition at a single concentration and the detailed
studies are presently underway. The inhibitory concen-
tration values for almost all of the new compounds as
seen from the preliminary data are considerably lower
than PAS in case of M. smegmatis (MIC > 650 lM) as
well as M. bovis BCG (MIC < 52 lM) indicating conju-
gation of hydroxyl-rich ligands is effective in synergisti-
cally enhancing the antimycobacterial activity of these
compounds. It is difficult to find reliable data in the lit-
erature concerning MICs, because experimental condi-
tions are so different that it could be erroneous to
compare published values.
7. Adilakshmi, T.; Ayling, P. D.; Ratledge, C. J. Bacteriol.
2000, 182, 264.
8. Vergne, A. F.; Walz, A. J.; Miller, M. J. Nat. Prod. Rep.
2000, 17, 99.
9. Rengarajan, J.; Sassetti, C.; Naroditskaya, V.; Sloutsky,
A.; Bloom, B. R.; Rubin, E. J. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 53,
275.
10. Patole, J.; Dutta, S.; Padhye, S.; Sinn, E. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 2001, 318, 207.
Conjugation of heterocyclic ring gave a slight improve-
ment in the activity of the compounds. This is impor-
tant, as many of the existing first-line antitubercular
drugs possess such structural motif.
11. Afrasiabi, Z.; Sinn, E.; Padhye, S.; Dutta, S.; Padhye, S.;
Newton, C.; Anson, C. E.; Powell, A. K. J. Inorg.
Biochem. 2003, 95, 306.
12. Garg, B. S.; Singh, P. K.; Sharma, J. L. Synth. React.
Inorg. Met.—Org. Chem. 2000, 30, 803.
13. Nawar, N.; Honsy, N. M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 47,
944.
Rapid drug resistance developed by M. tuberculosis is
generally due to decreased drug permeability induced
by the bacteria by thickening their cell wall so that only
lipophilic derivatives can penetrate such waxy cell wall.8
The recent genomic data on M. tuberculosis have shown
that about 12% of its genes are involved in cell wall and
14. Sangeetha, N. R.; Pal, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2000, 73,
357.