1828 Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 10, 1999
Winter and Geiger
is significant that throughout both chemically reversible
redox sequences, namely the oxidation of 1 followed by
rereduction of the product and the reduction of 1
followed by reoxidation of the product, the cyclic P5 ring
remains coordinated to the metal.
Exp er im en ta l Section
All operations were conducted under an atmosphere of
dinitrogen using standard Schlenk and drybox procedures.
Solvents were distilled from drying agents before use, and
electrochemical experiments were conducted with solvents that
were vacuum-distilled from drying agents into flasks that were
transferred into the drybox. Complex 1 was obtained from Dr.
T. Mohr and Prof. O. J . Scherer (University of Kaiserslautern)
and used as received. Tris(p-bromophenyl)ammonium hexaflu-
orophosphate was prepared according to the literature.10
Reagent-grade dichloromethane was twice distilled from
CaH2, and THF was subjected to successive distillations from
CaH2, K, and (deep purple) K/benzophenone. 1,2-Difluoroben-
zene (Strem) was stirred over and vacuum-distilled from
activated alumina. The supporting electrolyte was generally
0.1 M [NBu4][PF6], recrystallized from 95% EtOH and dried
at 373 K under vacuum for at least 2 days. For subambient-
temperature work in THF, [NBu4][CF3SO3] was employed as
supporting electrolyte for solubility reasons. Prepared by the
procedure of Dolphin et al.,11 the salt was successively
recrystallized from Et2O and a 3/1 CH2Cl2/Et2O mixture to
yield a waxlike white solid which was finely crushed and dried
at 351 K under vacuum. Although a silver/silver chloride
electrode was used as the experimental reference electrode,
all potentials in this paper are referred to the ferrocene/
F igu r e 1. Cyclic voltammogram of 0.5 mM 1 in CH2Cl2/
0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] at 260 K (v ) 0.5 V/s, Pt electrode).
ESR spectra were measured with a modified Varian E-4
spectrometer using dpph as a standard. Samples were trans-
ferred from electrolyzed solutions into ESR tubes, capped with
a rubber septum, removed from the drybox, and immediately
frozen at 77 K until ESR analysis.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
It will be shown below that both the anodic and
cathodic reactions of 1 proceed through ECEC mecha-
nisms; that is, fast chemical reactions follow each
electron-transfer step observed for this complex and its
electrode products. Peaks A and B (Figure 1) comprise
a chemically reversible oxidation/reduction couple, and
peaks C and D constitute a chemically reversible reduc-
tion/oxidation couple. The fully oxidized and fully
reduced products are very reactive and have resisted
our efforts to isolate them. ESR measurements and
voltammetric mechanistic studies shed light, however,
on their probable structures.
Oxid a tion of 1. Complex 1 has a single anodic wave
(peak A in Figure 1) in CH2Cl2 which is irreversible at
slow scan rates, n (except at very low concentrations,
vide infra), apparently involving one electron (constant
current function from 0.1 to 1 V/s; diffusion coefficient
at 269 K 1.80 × 10-5 cm2/s; cf. diffusion of ferrocene in
CH2Cl2 at 1.4 × 10-5 cm2/s;12b Ep - Ep/2 ) 46-48 mV
at 250 K compared to 48 mV expected for a Nernstian
one-electron process).13 Qualitatively similar behavior
was observed when the solvent was 1,2-difluorobenzene.
The presence of a coupled cathodic wave (peak A′,
Figure 1) at higher scan rates established the E1/2 value
as 0.57 V vs Fc and gave evidence for at least transient
1+. Since the single product wave (B, Ep,c ) -0.03 V)
found at lower scan rates is ascribed to reduction of the
dimer [12]2+ on the basis of concentration studies, the
oxidation mechanism of 1 is written as a dimerization
following reversible electron transfer (eqs 1 and 2; the
dimerization rate constant is designated as kD(17) since
the reaction involves the 17-electron cation 1+).
ferrocenium couple; on
a practical basis, the latter was
obtained by adding ferrocene as an internal standard at an
appropriate point in each experiment. Since the electrochemi-
cal behavior of 1 appeared to be identical on Pt, Au, and glassy
C electrodes, only the results on Pt are presented here.
Homemade Pt disks of diameter 125, 250, or 625 µm were
employed for cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans, the choice of
electrode depending on scan rate. Steady-state voltammograms
were recorded at a Pt electrode rotating at 1800 rpm. The area
of a larger Pt disk (A ) 0.35 cm2) used for chronoamperometry
studies was calibrated using the diffusion coefficient reported
for ferrocene in CH3CN by Hershberger et al.12a
Voltammetric measurements were performed using a PARC
Model 173 potentiostat interfaced to home-written software.
Along with the electrochemical cell, the electrometer monitor
was housed inside the drybox in order to minimize noise.
Solution temperatures were controlled to better than 1 °C by
immersion of the electrochemical cell in
a temperature-
controlled (FTS Systems) heptane bath. Bulk electrolyses were
conducted in a cell having two compartments separated by a
20 mm fine frit; a Pt-gauze cylinder was used as the working
electrode, and coulometry was monitored with a PARC Model
276 plug-in. Mechanistic criteria for diffusion control, revers-
ibility, etc, were applied as described earlier.13Measurement
of the peak potential shifts for 1 in THF as a function of the
CV scan rate utilized an internal standard of decamethylfer-
rocene in order to account for resistive losses. The anodic peak
height of the standard was equal to the cathodic peak height
of 1 in these experiments.
(10) (a) Schmidt, W.; Steckhan, E. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 577. (b)
See also references in: Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chem. Rev. 1996,
96, 877.
(11) Rosseau, K.; Farrington, G. C.; Dolphin, D. J . Org. Chem. 1972,
37, 3968.
(12) (a) Hershberger, J . W.; Klingler, R. J .; Kochi, J . K. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 61. (b) Bond, A. M.; Henderson, T. L. E.; Mann, D. R.;
Mann, T. E.; Thormann, W.; Zoski, C. G. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 1878.
(13) Geiger, W. E. In Laboratory Techniques in Electroanalytical
Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Kissinger, P. T., Heineman, W. R., Eds.; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1996; p 683ff.
1 h 1+ + e-
(1)
(2)
kD(17)
2 1+ y z [12]2+
kM(17)
The potentials for oxidation and reduction of 1 are
given in Table 1 along with those for related complexes
that are compared below.