S. Li et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 14 (2015) 178–184
179
Thus, compound 1 was established as 20-epi-urs-12,18-dien-28-
oic acid 3 -O- -arabinopyranoside.
b
a-L
Compound 2 was obtained as white powder. Its molecular
formula was determined to be C37H56O8 according to the [M-H]ꢀ
ion peak at m/z627.3891(calc’d. 627.3897). An anomeric proton
observed at dH 4.83 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz) showed HSQC correlation
with the anomeric carbon at dC 104.8 (C-1 of Ara), Which indicated
the presence of one sugar unit in the structure of compound 2. The
structure of the sugar residue yielded from acid hydrolysis of 2 was
identified as L-arabinose by GC analysis. Comparing the NMR
spectrum of compound 2 with that of compound 1, it was
suggested that 2 was derived from the acetylation of 1, The
downfield shift of C-2 (+1.4 ppm) of Ara at dC 74.5 suggested that
the acetyl (Ac) group was located at C-2 of arabinose, and the
assignment was supported by the HMBC correlation between dH
5.98 (H-2 of Ara) and dC 170.1 (C-1 of Ac) (Fig. 2). Thus, compound 2
was elucidated as 20-epi-urs-12,18-dien-28-oic acid 3
acetyl)- -arabinopyranoside.
b
-O-(20-O-
a-L
Compound 3 was obtained as white powder. Its molecular
formula was determined to be C37H56O9 based on the positive HR-
ESI–MS. An anomeric proton observed at dH 5.13 (1H, d, J = 14.0 Hz,
H-1 of GlcA) showed HSQC correlation to the anomeric carbon at dC
107.5 (C-1 of GlcA), indicating the presence of a sugar unit in the
structure of compound 3. The sugar residue obtained from the acid
hydrolysis of 3 was identified as
analysis. The 13C NMR spectrum of 3 was very similar to that of urs-
12,18-dien-28-oic acid -O- -glucuronopyranoside-6-O-
methyl ester, and the main differences arising from the significant
downfield shifts of C-18 (+11.4) at 134.8 and C-22 (+1.1) at
35.9 due to the -effect of the 30- (axial) methyl group that were
observed when compared with urs-12,18-dien-28-oic acid 3 -O-
-glucuronopyranoside-6-O-methyl ester which possesses a 30-
a (equatorial) methyl group instead (Hidaka et al.,1987). Moreover,
the orientation assignment of Me-30 was also confirmed by
D-glucuronic acid by the GC
3
b
b-D
Fig. 1. Structures of the compounds 1–9.
d
d
2. Results and discussion
g
b
b
2.1. Structure Identification of the isolates
b-D
A 50% EtOH extract of the aerial parts of I. cornuta was subjected
to column chromatographic separations on macroporous resin
D101, silica gel and octadecylsilane (ODS) silica gel, yielding seven
new triterpenoids (1–7) and two known ones which were
b
comparing its spectroscopic data with those of compound 1.
Therefore, the structure of 3 was elucidated as 20-epi-urs-12,18-
dien-28-oic acid 3
ter.
b-O-b-D-glucuronopyranoside-6-O-methyl es-
identified as 3
b
-hydroxy-20
a
b
(H)-urs-12,18-dien-28-oic acid (8)
-O- -arabinopyranosyl-20 (H)-
-glucopyranoside (9) (Che
(Ali and Srivastava, 1990), 3
urs-12,18-dien-28-oic acid 28-O-b-D
a
-L
a
Compound 4 was obtained as white powder. Its molecular
formula was assigned as C30H46O4 on the basis of its positive HR-
ESI–MS [M + Na]+ ion peak at m/z493.3318 (calc’d. 493.3294). The
1H NMR spectrum showed the singlet resonances of five tertiary
et al., 2012) (Fig. 1).
Compound 1 was isolated as white powder, and its negative-ion
HR-ESI–MS showed a quasimolecular [M + Na]+ ion peak at m/z
609.3796, attributed to the molecular formula of C35H54O7Na
(calc’d. 609.3767). The 1H NMR spectrum showed the singlet
methyl groups at
s, Me-26), 1.07 (3H, s, Me-24), 1.01 (3H, s, Me-25), one methyl
doublet at 1.12 (3H, d, J = 10.0 Me-30), an olefinic proton signal at
5.69 (1H, m, H-12), and the signals of a hydroxymethylene group at
4.23 (1H, m, H-23), 3.76 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-23), as well as the
d 1.08(3H, s, Me-27), 1.89 (3H, s, Me-29), 1.09 (3H,
d
resonances of six tertiary methyl groups at
d 0.97 (3H, s, Me-25),
1.06 (3H, s, Me-24),1.12 (3H, s, Me-26),1.23 (3H, s, Me-27),1.38 (3H,
s, Me-23), 1.97 (3H, s, Me-29), one methyl doublet at 1.21 (3H, d,
d
signal of a oxygen-bearing methine at d4.28 (1H, dd, J = 5.0, 10.0 Hz,
H-3). The 13C NMR showed resonances for 30 carbon atoms, whose
multiplicity patterns were revealed from the DEPT and HSQC
experiments as six methyls, ten methylenes, five methines, and
nine quaternary carbons. It showed four olefinic C-atoms at dC
126.4, 134.5, 135.6, 139.6, one oxymethylene group at dC 67.6,
J = 6.5 Hz Me-30), an olefinic proton signal at
d
5.73 (1H, m, H-12),
and the signal of a oxygen-bearing methine at
d
3.49 (1H, dd, J = 4.0,
12.0 Hz, H-3). The NMR spectra indicated that the aglycone of 1 was
a 3 -hydroxy-20-epi-urs-12,18-dien-28-oic acid by comparing its
b
spectroscopic data with those of compound 8 (Ali and Srivastava,
1990). In the 1H NMR spectrum, an anomeric proton was observed
at dH 4.90 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), which showed HSQC correlation with
the anomeric carbon at dC 107.7 (C-1 of arabinose (Ara)), indicating
the presence of one sugar unit in the structure of compound 1. The
sugar residue yielded from acid hydrolysis of 1 was identified as L-
arabinose by GC analysis. The location of arabinopyranosyl group
was assigned at C-3 of the aglycone on the basis of the observations
corresponding to C-23, and one oxymethine carbon at
d 73.1,
corresponding to C-3, as well as one carboxyl group at dC 178.8,
corresponding to C-28. The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 4 was
similar to that of compound 8 except for the significant chemical
shift change of C-23 (+38.5 ppm) at dC 67.6, suggesting the methyl
group in compound 8 was replaced by the hydroxymethylene
group in compound 4. The assignment was confirmed by the
observation of HMBC correlations between C-23 at dC 67.6 and Me-
24 at dH 1.07, and between C-24 at dC 13.2 and Me-23 at dH 3.76.
of the down field shift of H-3 at d3.49, the correlation between dH
3.49 (H-3) and dC 107.7 (C-1 of Ara), as well as the correlation
between dH 4.90 (H-1 of Ara) and dC 89.0 (C-3 of the aglycone) in
Thus, compound 4 was identified as 3b,23-dihydroxy-20-epi-urs-
the HMBC spectrum (Fig. 2). The
anosyl unit was inferred from the NOESY correlations between
4.90 (H-1 of Ara) and 4.26 (H-3 of Ara), 4.42 (H-4 of Ara) (Fig. 2).
a-configuration of arabinopyr-
12,18-dien-28-oic acid.
d
Compound 5 was isolated as white powder. Its HR-ESI–MS
[M + HCOOH-H]ꢀ ion peak at m/z 647.3801 (calc’d. 647.3795)
d