SCHEME 1. Reaction of 1a with Tin Radicals
Ring-Opening Reactions of
Difluoro(methylene)cyclopropanes with Halogens
and Amines
Xiao-Chun Hang, Qing-Yun Chen, and Ji-Chang Xiao*
Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, 354 Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032 China
t-BuLi-induced hydrogen abstraction, and retro-Diels-Alder
reaction.4 However, we found that the cycloadducts of F2MCPs
and nitrones could rearrange to give the ring-opened 3,3-
difluorinated tetrahydropyridinols at elevated temperature.5 As
an extension of our interest in the stability of the difluorocy-
clopropane rings in F2MCPs, we investigated their ring-opening
reactions under different conditions.
ReceiVed July 21, 2008
Under thermal reaction conditions, nonfluorinated MCPs
could generate diradical intermediates by homolytic cleavage
of the cyclopropane rings.2c,6 In the case of 1,1-difluoro-2-
methylenecyclopropane, the simplest homologue of F2MCPs,
the similar ring-opening rearrangement was experimentally
investigated by Dolbier and computationally studied by Borden.7
They found that the presence of two fluorine atoms in the
cyclopropane ring improved the ring strain.7a,c Therefore, we
postulated that the difluorocyclopropane ring might be cleaved
under radical conditions. Herein, we present the results.
Treatment of F2MCPs 1a with n-Bu3SnH in the presence of
2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) in toluene gave the ring-
opening product 2 in 42% yield (Scheme 1). The distal bond
of F2MCPs 1a was cleaved under this radical condition. In view
of the easy generation of halogen radicals under thermal
conditions, we reinvestigated the CuI-catalyzed ring-opening
reactions of F2MCPs 1a with I2.4a Unexpectedly, this reaction
can proceed smoothly even without the presence of CuI (Table
1, entries 2, 4, 6). Bromine was found to react equally well to
give the ring-opening products at lower temperature (entries 1,
3, 5), whereas in the case of ICl, the ring-opening product could
not be obtained and 1a was fully recovered (entry 7).
The distal and proximal bond of difluoro(methylene)cyclo-
propanes (F2MCPs) could be cleaved, respectively, under
different conditions to give the corresponding ring-opening
products. The reaction mechanisms are discussed.
Methylenecyclopropane derivatives (MCPs), which are rela-
tively stable but highly strained molecules, have been proved
to be useful building blocks in organic synthesis for their
remarkable chemical reactivity over the past decades.1 Among
the various reactions of MCPs, the reactions related to the ring-
opening process are most attractive to chemists,2 as one of the
fluorinated MCPs, difluoro(methylene)cyclopropanes (F2MCPs),
may possess many interesting properties derived from both steric
and electronic effects of the fluorinated cyclopropanes.3b
However, ring-opening reactions of F2MCPs are seldom dis-
closed due to the difficulty in their synthesis.3 Recently, we
found that F2MCPs could be readily prepared from the direct
difluorocyclopropanation of allenes.4a It was shown that the
difluorocyclopropane rings in F2MCPs are quite stable under
many reaction conditions, such as Pd-catalyzed Heck reaction,
To gain more insight into the reaction mechanism of F2MCPs
1 with halogen, inhibition experiment was carried out. Addition
of the free radical inhibitor hydroquinone (20 mol %) to the
reaction mixture of 1a and Br2 decreased the yield of 3a from
50% (entry 1) to 13% (entry 8). On the basis of these
experiments it appears that bromine radical was involved in the
reaction, suggesting a reaction mechanism as shown in Scheme
2. Homolytic cleavage of Br2 resulted in the formation of
(3) (a) Wang, R.; Ksebati, M. B.; Corbett, T. H.; Kern, E. R.; Drach, J. C.;
Zemlicka, J. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 4019–4022. (b) Taguchi, T.; Okada, M. J.
Fluorine Chem. 2000, 105, 279–283. (c) Dolbier, W. R., Jr.; Burkholder, C. R.;
Chaves, A. L.; Green, A. J. Fluorine Chem. 1996, 77, 31–37. (d) Dolbier, W. R.,
Jr.; Seabury, M. J. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 2437–2442. (e) Dolbier, W. R., Jr.; Seabury,
M.; Daly, D. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 974–979. (f) Dolbier, W. R.; Sellers, S. F.;
Al-Sader, B. H; Fielder, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 718–720.
(4) (a) Cheng, Z.-L.; Xiao, J.-C.; Liu, C.; Chen, Q.-Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 5581–5587. (b) Hang, X. -C; Chen, Q. -Y.; Xiao, J.-C. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 1101–1106.
(5) Hang, X.-C; Chen, Q.-Y.; Xiao, J.-C Synlett 2008, 1989–1992.
(6) (a) Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1777–1783. (b) Creary, X. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 1611–1618.
(7) (a) Dolbier, W. R.; Gautriaud, E.; Cai, X. J. Fluorine Chem 2005, 126,
339–343. (b) Dolbier, W. R., Jr.; Fielder, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100,
5577–5578. (c) Lewis, S. B.; Hrovat, D. A.; Getty, S. J.; Borden, W. T. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 2339–2347. (d) Wei, H.; Hrovat, D. A.; Borden,
W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16676–2497.
(1) For recent reviews, see: (a) Goti, A.; Cordero, F. M.; Brandi, A. Top. Curr.
Chem. 1996, 178, 1–97. (b) Brandi, A.; Goti, A. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 589–635.
(c) Brandi, A.; Cicchi, S.; Cordero, F. M.; Goti, A. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1213–
1269. (d) Nakamura, I.; Yamamoto, Y. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 111–129. (e)
Rubin, M.; Rubina, M.; Gevorgyan, V. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 3117–3179.
(2) Selected references: (a) Lautens, M.; Klute, W.; Tam, W. Chem. ReV. 1996,
96, 49–92. (b) Nakamura, E.; Yamago, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 867–877. (c)
Creary, X. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 761–771. (d) Shao, L.-X.; Shi, M. Curr.
Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 1135–1153. (e) Huang, X.; Zhou, H.-W. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
4419–4422. (f) Kurahashi, T.; Meijere, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7881–
7884. (g) Fu¨rstner, A.; A¨ıssa, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6306–6307. (h)
Ohmura, T.; Taniguchi, H.; Kondo, Y.; Suginome, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 3518–3519. (i) Tailier, C.; Lautens, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 591–593.
8598 J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8598–8600
10.1021/jo801610t CCC: $40.75 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/01/2008