polymers, and efficient π-stacking between chains render
fully conjugated poly(benzobisoxazoles) (PBOs) insoluble
in aprotic solvents. As a result, PBOs are typically processed
from acidic solvents, such as Lewis acid/nitromethane,
methanesulfonic acid, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, and
sulfuric acid,8 which are impractical for use in device
manufacturing.
Generally, the solubility of π-conjugated materials can be
improved through structural modifcation. In the case of small
molecules and polymers containing the benzobisoxazole
moiety, the synthesis is achieved by the high-temperature
condensation of bis-o-aminophenols and aromatic diacids in
the melt, in polyphosphoric acid (PPA), in phosphorus
pentoxide/methanesulfonic acid, or in trimethylsilyl poly-
phosphate (PPSE)/o-dichlorobenzene.9 These conditions are
rather harsh, thereby limiting the types of substituents that
can be incorporated into the benzobisoxazole moiety.
In this contribution, we report the synthesis of optoelec-
tronic building blocks based on benzo[1,2-d;4,5-d′] bisox-
azole (trans-BBO) (3a-e) and benzo[1,2-d;5,4-d′] bisoxazole
(cis-BBO) (5a-e) by the reaction of various orthoesters
(2a-e) with 2,5-diaminohydroquinone (DAHQ) (1) and 4,6-
diaminoresorcinol (DAR) (4), respectively (Scheme 1). In
of orthoester, which serves as both a reagent and the solvent,
a catalytic amount of acid, and temperatures of 130 °C. Using
the reaction of triethyl orthoformate and DAHQ as our model
system, we first explored catalyst-free conditions, relying on
the acid coordinated with the diamino diol to catalyze the
reaction (entry 1). This yielded trans-BBO 3a in 61% yield.
When the reaction was performed under traditional condi-
tions, using catalytic amounts of H2SO4, the target compound
3a was obtained in 65% yield (entry 3). While the yields
were moderate in both cases, the product was contaminated
with a significant amount of dark red oxidation products,
complicating purification.
Due to the tendency of DAHQ 1 and DAR 4 to decompose
at higher temperatures, we needed to reduce the reaction
temperature. Furthermore, the use of such a large excess of
orthoester is undesirable since the substituted orthoesters are
costly. To reduce the need for excess orthoester, we used DMSO
as a cosolvent since it can dissolve both DAHQ and DAR. We
then explored the use of rare earth metal triflates as catalysts
since they have been demonstrated to reduce reaction times and
increase yields when used instead of traditional Lewis acid
catalysts.11 In the case of our model reaction, we found several
effective catalysts as shown in Table 1. Interestingly, the Lewis
Table 1. Investigation of the Effect of Catalyst on the Reaction
of DAHQ (1) with Triethyl Orthoformate 2aa
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2,6-Disubstituted Benzobisoxazoles
catalyst/
cosolvent
entry solvent
temp (°C) time (h) yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
none
DMSO none
none
DMSO H2SO4
DMSO PTSA
DMSO Bi(OTf)3
DMSO Hf(OTf)3
DMSO Eu(OTf)3
DMSO Sc(OTf)3
DMSO Y(OTf)3
none
130
60
130
130
110
60
60
60
60
60
5
2.5
2.5
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
61
64
65
64
71
0
36
82
82
81
0
H2SO4
all cases, the target compounds have been obtained cleanly
and in high yield. Using our strategy, we have synthesized
several building blocks suitable for the synthesis of benzo-
bisoxazole monomers.
We rationalized that orthoesters could be used for the
synthesis of benzobisoxazoles since they have been used for
the synthesis of benzimidazoles, benzoxazoles, and ben-
zothiazoles.10 The standard reaction conditions use 10 equiv
9
10
11
12
13
14
none
Yb(OTf)3
60
60
60
45
4
4
1
1
DMSO Yb(OTf)3
DMSO Y(OTf)3/Py
DMSO pyridine
75
92c
78c
a Standard reaction conditions: substrate 1 M in DMSO, 10 equiv of
orthoester, 5 mol % of catalyst, or py 2 equiv. b Isolated yields. c 3 equiv
of orthoester.
(6) (a) Osaheni, J. A.; Jenekhe, S. A. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 739.
(b) Osaheni, J. A.; Jenekhe, S. A. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 672. (c) Jenekhe,
S. A.; Osaheni, J. A.; Meth, J. S.; Vanherzeele, H. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4,
683. (d) Reinhardt, B. A.; Unroe, M. R.; Evers, R. C. Chem. Mater. 1991,
3, 451.
(7) (a) Wolfe, J. F. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering;
John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 1988; Vol. 11, p 601. (b) Wolfe,
J. F.; Loo, B. H.; Arnold, F. E. Macromolecules 1981, 14, 909.
(8) (a) Roberts, M. F.; Jenekhe, S. A. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 1744. (b)
So, Y. H.; Heeschen, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3552.
(9) (a) Osman, A. M.; Mohamed, S. A Indian J. Chem. 1973, 11, 868.
(b) Osman, A. M.; Mohamed, S. A. U.A.R.J. Chem. 1971, 14, 475. (c)
Imai, Y.; Itoya, K.; Kakimoto, M.-A. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2000, 201,
2251. (d) Imai, Y.; Taoka, I.; Uno, K.; Iwakura, Y. Makromol. Chem. 1965,
83, 167. (e) So, Y. H.; Zaleski, J.; Murlick, C.; Ellaboudy, A. Macromol-
ecules 1996, 29, 5229. (f) Kricheldorf, H. R.; Domschke, A. Polymer 1994,
35, 198.
acid cataysts do not work in the absence of the DMSO solvent.
With the exception of Bi(OTf)3 and Hf(OTf)3, all of the metal
triflates gave improved yields when compared to the traditional
acid catalysts. The low reactivity of Bi(III) and Hf(III) may be
attributed to their larger ionic radii.11
(10) (a) Jenkins, G. L.; Knevel, A. M.; Davis, C. S. J. Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 274. (b) Jois, Y. H. R.; Gibson, H. W. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1992, 29,
1365.
4916
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008