986
Vol. 56, No. 7
Table 1. Synthesis of Morphinan Derivatives
Isolated yield
Isolated yield
(%)
Ar
Entry
Entry
(%)
10a
60
11a
65
10b
11c
63
43
45
57
65
81
45
46
11b
11c
76
57
66
75
84
83
59
60
Fig. 2
10d
10e
11da)
11e
10f
11f
Reaction conditions: (a) arylboronic acid, (PPh3)4Pd, K2CO3, dioxane, microwave,
180 °C, 60 min; (b) (i) H2 (g), 37% formalin, 10% Pd/C, MeOH; (ii) prep HPLC
(CH3CN/H2O).
10g
10hb)
10ib)
11g
Chart 2
11hc)
11ic)
carbonate (2.0 eq) in dioxane (0.1 M) was stirred at 110 °C for
18 h to furnish 7 in 87% yield after purification by column
chromatography. Only a trace amount of reduced product 8
was isolated under these conditions. Likewise, microwave ir-
radiation24) can be adopted to conduct the Suzuki–Miyaura
cross-coupling reaction to produce 7 in 73% yield.25)
a) A small amount of dechlorinated compound was also observed on LC-MS. b)
Thiophene derivatives did not undergo smooth hydrogenation as usual. c) N-17-Boc-
3-hydroxymorphinan was employed to produce these compounds.
Conclusion
At this stage, we briefly considered the possibility of con-
In summary, we have achieved a convenient synthesis of
verting 7 into 9 in order to make DF (2) in a stepwise fash- dimemorfan (DF), a potential neuroprotective agent for the
ion. However, we were also intrigued by the more attractive treatment of the brain diseases such as Alzheimer or Parkin-
possibility of transforming 7 directly into DF (2). Indeed, son’s disease by adopting Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling re-
subjecting a MeOH solution of 7 under hydrogen gas in the action. This concise synthesis of dimemorfan clearly exem-
presence of palladium on charcoal and formalin produced plifies the utility of the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reac-
DF (2) in 76% yield.26,27) The compound was isolated by tion, thereby providing dimemorfan in 57% overall yield in a
preparative reverse-phase HPLC (CH3CN/H2O) to provide sequence of only four steps starting from the commercially
DF 2 (Fig. 2).28)
available 3-hydroxymorphinan. Since the synthetic route to-
With a satisfactory route to DF in hand, we next parlayed wards dimemorfan unveiled here readily provides morphinan
the key Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction into prepa- derivatives, the synthetic method will be further utilized to
ration of the needed biaryl-type morphinan derivatives (Table provide morphinan libraries for the in-depth studies of struc-
1).
As illustrated in Chart 2, the triflate 5 reacted with some of
ture–activity relationships (SAR).
Acknowledgments Financial support was provided by Green Cross
Corporation (GCC). We would like to acknowledge Dr. Chong-Hwan Chang
for his inspiration to create small molecule programs at GCC.
the commercially available arylboronic acids to give biaryl-
type morphinan analogs as in structure 10. All of these cross-
coupling reactions went smoothly giving rise to the corre-
sponding biaryl compounds in moderate to good yields. Es-
pecially, we observed that the cross-coupling of pyridin-4-yl-
boronic acid or pyridin-3-ylboronic acid with the triflate 5
furnished the corresponding biaryl morphinan analogs in
higher yields (entry 10g in Table 1). Further elaboration of
the coupled products demonstrates the utility of amino func-
tionality. Thus, subjecting a MeOH solution of compounds of
10a—g under hydrogen gas in the presence of palladium on
charcoal and formalin produced methylated compounds of
structure 11a—g in 57—84% yields. The compounds were
isolated by preparative reverse-phase HPLC (CH3CN/H2O)
to afford structure 11 (Chart 2, Table 1). Regarding thio-
phene-containing compounds (entry 11h, i), we found out
that N-17-Boc-3-hydroxymorphinan in lieu of N-17-Cbz-3-
hydroxymorphinan 4 can be employed to produce 11h or 11i,
adopting the analogous reaction sequence in Chart 2.
References and Notes
1) Hwang J.-K., WO 2006/104369 (2006).
2) Ferkany J. W., Borosky S. A., Clissold D. B., Pontecorvo M. J., Eur. J.
Pharmacol., 151, 151—154 (1988).
3) Kim H.-C., Pennypacker K., Bing G., Bronstein D., McMillian M.,
Hong J. S., Neurotoxicology, 17, 375—386 (1996).
4) Kim H.-C., Suh H. W., Bronstein D., Bing G., Wilson B., Hong J. S.,
Neuropeptides, 31, 105—112 (1997).
5) Kim H.-C., Lee P. H., Jhoo W.-K., Int. Symp. Mol. Monitor Neurosci.
Field (Nagoya), 3, 1—2 (1998).
6) Kim H.-C., Bing G., Jhoo W.-K., Ko K. H., Kim W.-K., Lee D. C.,
Brain Res., 824, 125—132 (1999).
7) Kim H.-C., Ko K. H., Kim W.-K., Shin E.-J., Kang K. S., Shin C. Y.,
Behav. Brain Res., 120, 169—175 (2001).
8) Kim H.-C., Nabeshima T., Jhoo W.-K., Ko K. H., Kim W.-K., Shin E.-
J., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 11, 1651—1654 (2001).
9) Kim H.-C., Bing G., Shin E.-J., Jhoo H. S., Cheon M. A., Lee S. H.,
Life Sci., 69, 615—624 (2001).
10) Kim H.-C., Bing G., Jhoo W.-K., Kim W.-K., Shin E.-J., Im D. H., Life
Sci., 72, 769—783 (2003).