Furthermore, the use of stoichiometric amounts of organo-
metallic reagents in this cross-coupling reaction resulted,
unfortunately, again in the generation of undesired byproduct
(vide supra).3
Scheme 2. Dehydrative Direct Arylations of Oxazoline 2a
On the contrary, a significantly more sustainable approach
would be represented by unprecedented direct arylations of
arenes as pronucleophiles with phenols as proelectrophilic
arylating reagents Via functionalizations of C-H and C-OH
bonds (Scheme 1, (d)). Herein, we present a first example
of such a dehydrative coupling between simple arenes and
inexpensive phenols,4 which was accomplished with a highly
chemo- and regioselective ruthenium5 catalyst.
As part of our program directed toward the development
of sustainable metal-catalyzed direct arylations,6 we probed
different transition metals, (pre)ligands, bases, and additives
for the envisioned dehydrative direct arylation with phenols.
Among a variety of reaction conditions, a system comprising
ruthenium precursor [{RuCl2(p-cymene)}2] and HASPO7
preligand 1, along with K2CO3, p-toluenesulfonyl chloride
(p-TsCl), and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), was found to
be superior (Tables S-1, and S-2 in the Supporting Informa-
tion).
Thereby, an efficient and selective in situ activation of
the phenolic starting material was accomplished. The meth-
odology turned out to be operationally simple, since a
successive addition of reagents for a preformation of the
electrophile was not necessary. In addition to its chemical
stability, the in situ generated catalyst displayed a remarkable
chemo- and regioselectivity. Hence, undesired byproducts
originating from nucleophilic reactivities of the phenols8,9
or from desulfinylative coupling reactions10 were not ob-
served.11
With an optimized catalytic system in hand, we tested its
scope in dehydrative direct arylations of oxazoline 2a using
differently substituted phenols (Scheme 2). These studies
highlighted a broad functional group tolerance, which set
the stage for the efficient conversion of electron-deficient
(4a-f), as well as electron-rich (4g-i) phenols, bearing inter
alia an ester, ketones, alkyl, and aryl fluorides, or an ether.
Importantly, the high efficacy of the ruthenium catalyst
allowed further for catalytic reactions to be performed at a
reduced reaction temperature of 100 °C, as illustrated for
the preparation of oxazoline 4b.
Notably, dehydrative direct arylations were not restricted
to oxazolines as pronucleophiles but could be employed for
the direct functionalization of pyrazolyl-substituted arenes
as well (Scheme 3). Hence, functionalized, electron-deficient,
as well as electron-rich phenols 3 provided the desired
biphenyls 6a-i in high yields. Additionally, pyridyl-
substituted pronucleophiles could be directly arylated, giving
selectively the desired biphenyls 7a-c.
(3) Kang, F.-A.; Sui, Z.; Murray, W. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
11300–11302.
(4) For elegant ruthenium-catalyzed arylations of aryl ethers through
C-OMe or C-NMe2 bond functionalizations, see: (a) Kakiuchi, F.; Usui,
M.; Ueno, S.; Chatani, N.; Murai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2706–
2707. (b) Ueno, S.; Mizushima, E.; Chatani, N.; Kakiuchi, F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 16516–16517. (c) Ueno, S.; Chatani, N.; Kakiuchi, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6098–6099. (d) For alkenylations with alkenyl
acetates, see: Matsuura, Y.; Tamura, M.; Kochi, T.; Sato, M.; Chatani, N.;
Kakiuchi, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9858–9859.
(8) Review on copper-catalyzed O-arylations of phenols: (a) Ley, S. V.;
Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400–5449. (b) Recent
reviews on palladium-catalyzed arylations: Surry, D. S.; Buchwald, S. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6338–6361. (c) Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, DOI: 10.1021/ar800098p.
(9) For rhodium-catalyzed ortho-arylations of phenols, see: (a) Bedford,
R. B.; Betham, M.; Caffyn, A. J. M.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Lewis-Alleyne,
L. C.; Long, P. D.; Polo-Ceron, D.; Prashar, S. Chem. Commun. 2008, 990–
992. (b) Oi, S.; Watanabe, S.-I.; Fukita, S.; Inoue, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 8665–8668. (c) Bedford, R. B.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.;
Limmert, M. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 112–114.
(5) Representative ruthenium-catalyzed direct arylations: (a) Kakiuchi,
F.; Matsuura, Y.; Kan, S.; Chatani, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5936–
5945. (b) Oi, S.; Aizawa, E.; Ogino, Y.; Inoue, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
3113–3119. (c) Oi, S.; Sato, H.; Sugawara, S.; Inoue, Y. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 1823–1826. (d) Selected examples from our laboratories: Ackermann,
L.; Althammer, A.; Born, R. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6115–6124. (e)
Ackermann, L.; Althammer, A.; Born, R. Synlett 2007, 2833–2836. (f)
(10) Dubbaka, S. R.; Vogel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7674–
7684.
(11) Representative procedure, synthesis of product 4h: A suspension
of [{RuCl2(p-cymene)}2] (7.7 mg, 0.012 mmol, 2.50 mol %), oxazoline 2a
(80.9 mg, 0.502 mmol), preligand 1 (21.4 mg, 0.050 mmol, 10.0 mol %),
K2CO3 (173 mg, 1.25 mmol), naphthalen-2-ol (3h) (86.5 mg, 0.600 mmol),
and p-TsCl (114 mg, 0.600 mmol) in dry DMA (1.5 mL) was stirred for 5
min at ambient temperature and then for 18 h at 120 °C under N2. At ambient
temperature, EtOAc (70 mL) and H2O (50 mL) were added to the reaction
mixture, and the separated aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2 ×
70 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL),
dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The remaining residue was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc, 15/1
f 2/1) to yield 4h (111 mg, 77%) as an off-white solid.
´
Ackermann, L.; Born, R.; Alvarez Bercedo, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2007,
46, 6364–6367. (g) Ackermann, L.; Althammer, A.; Born, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2619–2622. (h) Ackermann, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3123–
3125, and references cited therein.
(6) Recent examples: (a) Ackermann, L.; Potukuchi, H. K.; Landsberg,
D.; Vicente, R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3081–3084. (b) Ackermann, L.; Vicente,
R.; Born, R. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 741–748. (c) Kozhushkov, S. I.;
Yufit, D. S.; Ackermann, L. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3409–3412. (d) Ackermann,
L.; Althammer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1627–1629.
(7) Ackermann, L. Synthesis 2006, 1557–1571.
5044
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008