G. Pürstinger et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5123–5125
5125
Table 4
Activities (on MRC-5 cells,
picornaviruses
3. Archard, L. C.; Khan, M. A.; Soteriou, B. A.; Zhang, H.; Why, H. J.; Robinson, N.
M.; Richardson, P. J. Hum. Pathol. 1998, 29, 578.
4. Esfandiarei, M.; McManus, B. M. Annu. Rev. Pathol.: Mech. Dis. 2008, 3, 127.
5. Chapman, N. M.; Kim, K. S. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 323, 275.
6. Barnard, D. L. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2006, 12, 1379.
7. Florea, N. R.; Maglio, D.; Nicolau, D. P. Pharmacotherapy 2003, 23, 339.
8. Pevear, D. C.; Fancher, M. J.; Felock, P. J.; Rossmann, M. G.; Miller, M. S.; Diana,
G.; Treasurywala, A. M.; McKinlay, M. A.; Dutko, F. J. J. Virol. 1989, 63, 2002.
9. Hayden, F. G.; Herrington, D. T.; Coats, T. L.; Kim, K.; Cooper, E. C.; Villano, S. A.;
Liu, S.; Hudson, S.; Pevear, D. C.; Collett, M.; McKinlay, M. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003,
36, 1523.
10. Rotbart, H. A.; Webster, A. D. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 228.
11. Senior, K. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2, 264.
12. Groarke, J. M.; Pevear, D. C. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 179, 1538.
13. Kandolf, R.; Hofschneider, P. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985, 82, 4818.
14. Shia, K.-S.; Li, W.-T.; Chang, C.-M.; Hsu, M.-C.; Chern, J.-H.; Leong, M. K.; Tseng,
S.-N.; Lee, C.-C.; Lee, Y.-C.; Chen, S.-J.; Peng, K.-C.; Tseng, H.-Y.; Chang, Y.-L.; Tai,
C.-L.; Shih, S.-R. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1644.
l
M)a of selected compounds against selected non-CVB
Compound
CVA 24
1.8 0.9
>240
23 7.7
>364
19 9.4
>350
Echo 9
Echo 11
Entero 68
1
2
3
5
7
27
40
42
51
>324
>416
35 18
>364
>393
>350
>323
>323
>346
6.7 3.7
>416
35 15
>364
>393
>350
12 9.0
>416
22
7
>364
76 28
>350
>309
>323
>323
>323
>346
>323
>323
>346
234 70
a
Values are means of three independent experiments standard deviation.
15. Krippner, G. Y.; Chalmers, D. K.; Stanislawski, P. C.; Tucker, S. P.; Watson, K. G.
Aust. J. Chem. 2004, 57, 553.
16. Makarov, V. A.; Riabova, O. B.; Granik, V. G.; Wutzler, P.; Schmidtke, M. J.
Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 55, 483.
17. Markley, L. D.; Tong, Y. C.; Dulworth, J. K.; Steward, D. L.; Goralski, C. T.;
Johnston, H.; Wood, S. G.; Vinogradoff, A. P.; Bargar, T. M. J. Med. Chem. 1986,
29, 427.
18. Padalko, E.; Verbeken, E.; De Clercq, E.; Neyts, J. J. Med. Virol. 2004, 72, 263.
19. Torney, H. L.; Dulworth, J. K.; Steward, D. L. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1982,
22, 635.
Nine compounds were selected for evaluation against a set of 4
non-CVB enteroviruses (Table 4). This selection was based on the
activities against CVB 3 and on diversity with respect to the substi-
tution pattern of the phenoxy substructure. The lead compound
MDL-860 (1) proved active against CVA 24, echovirus 11 and
enterovirus 68, but was inactive against echovirus 9. Only the 2-
chloro analogue (3) proved active against all four non-CVB entero-
viruses, and five analogues (2, 5, 27, 40 and 42) were inactive
against any of the four viruses. Compound 40, therefore, seemed
to be a selective inhibitor of coxsackie B virus replication. Com-
pound 7 had moderate activity against CVA 24 and enterovirus
68, whereas the 3-methyl-4-chloro analogue 51 exhibited only
weak activity against CVA 24.
20. Powers, R. D.; Gwaltney, J. M.; Hayden, F. G. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
1982, 22, 639.
21. All compounds were characterized by 1H NMR spectra, MS spectra, combustion
analyses and melting points. All analogues except 33, 35 and 36 were prepared
by reaction of 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzonitrile with an appropriately substituted
phenol (Scheme 1). Compound 33 was synthesized by reaction of 20 with
potassium thiocyanate in a mixture of toluene and 6 N HCl (6 h at 90 °C).
Compounds 35 and 36 were prepared by oxidation of compound 34 with
metachloroperbenzoic acid (1 or 2.5 equiv, respectively) in dichloromethane at
ambient temperature. Synthesis of MDL-860 (1) as an example: To a mixture of
2-chloro-5-nitrobenzonitrile (300 mg), 3,4-dichlorophenol (268 mg, 1 equiv)
and anhydrous potassium carbonate (341 mg, 1.5 equiv) was added 3 mL of
dry DMF, and the resulting suspension was stirred for 24 h at ambient
temperature (tlc control: silica gel, eluent: light petroleum/ethyl acetate = 3:1
(v/v)). Then, water (50 mL) was slowly added and the resulting precipitate was
filtered, washed with water and dried. The crude product was purified by
recrystallization from a mixture of diisopropyl ether (20 mL) and ethyl acetate
(7 mL); off-white crystals; mp: 156–158 °C (155–156 °C);17 yield: 63%; 1H
NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 8.88 (d, 1H, H6, J = 2.8 Hz), 8.43 (dd, 1H, H4, J = 9.3,
2.8 Hz), 7.84–7.78 (m, 2H, H20/50), 7.39 (dd, 1H, H60, J = 8.8, 2.8 Hz), 7.19 (d, 1H,
H3, J = 9.3 Hz); MS (CI): m/z calcd for C13H6Cl2N2O3 (M+) 308.0, found 307.9;
Anal. (C13H6Cl2N2O3): Calcd C, 50.51; H, 1.96; N, 9.06. Found C, 50.54; H, 2.09;
N, 8.97.
The exact mode of action of this class of compounds against
enteroviruses has yet to be figured out. Without knowing the tar-
get (and the structural differences of the target within the different
enteroviruses), it is very difficult to fully understand the obtained
structure–activity relationships (SARs).
In summary, several of the MDL-860 analogues are selective
inhibitors of CVB replication with activities that are comparable
to or slightly better than that of the lead compound. The SAR of this
class of compounds for CVB 3 does, however, not parallel the SAR
for other enteroviruses. At least one compound (3) was identified
that had broad-spectrum enterovirus activity and that was—unlike
the lead compound MDL-860—active against echovirus 9. Further
exploration of this class of compounds should allow obtaining fur-
ther insights into the SAR for inhibition of enterovirus replication.
Also studies are underway to identify the molecular target of this
class of compounds. Once this target has been identified, this infor-
mation may help to rationally design analogues with improved
antiviral activity.
22. Antiviral assay. The antiviral activity of the selected compounds was
determined using an MTS-based cytopathic effect (CPE) reduction assay and
was expressed as the 50% effective concentration (EC50), or the concentration
of compound that inhibits virus-induced cytopathic effect formation by 50%.
Cells, grown to confluency in 96-well plates, were infected with 100 CCID50 of
virus, one CCID50 being the 50% cell culture infective dose. After an adsorption
period of 2 h at 37 °C, virus was removed and serial dilutions of the compounds
were added. The cultures were further incubated at 37 °C for 3 days, until
complete CPE was observed in the infected and untreated virus control (VC).
After removal of the medium, 90 ll medium and 10 ll MTS/PMS (Promega,
Leiden, The Netherlands) were added to each well. After an incubation period
of 2 h at 37 °C, the optical density of each well was read at 498 nm in a
Acknowledgments
microplate reader. CPE values were calculated as follows:
%
CPE = 100*[ODCC ꢀ ODCVB3+Compound]/[ODCC ꢀ ODVC]. In these formulae, ODCC
corresponds to the optical density of the uninfected and untreated cell
cultures, ODVC represents the infected and untreated cell cultures and
We thank Mrs. M.-H. Stuyck for excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported by the VIZIER EU FP7—Integrated Project
(GrantLSHG-CT-2004–51196)andbyVIRGIL, theEuropeanNetwork
of Excellence on Antiviral Drug Resistance (Grant LSHM-CT-2004-
503359 from the Priority 1 ‘Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnol-
ogy’). Armando M. De Palma is a postdoctoral research fellow of the
FWO (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen).
ODCVB3+Compound are CVB3-infected cell cultures, treated with
a given
concentration of compound. Cytotoxic assay. The cytotoxicity of the
compounds was evaluated by the MTS-method and the 50% cytotoxic
concentration (CC50) was calculated. Briefly, the same experimental set-up
was used as for the antiviral assay, but for cytotoxicity determination,
uninfected cultures were incubated with serial dilution of compound for
three days at 37 °C. The cytotoxic activity was calculated using the following
formula: % CPE = 100*[ODCCꢀODCompound]/ODCC, where ODCC corresponds to the
optical density of the uninfected and untreated cell cultures and ODCompound
are uninfected cultures, treated with compound.
References and notes
1. Sawyer, M. H. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2001, 13, 65.
2. Rotbart, H. A. Antiviral Res. 2002, 53, 83.
23. Verma, R. P.; Hansch, C. Virology 2007, 359, 152.