The synthetic potential of this catalytic approach is due
to the formation of useful chiral building blocks,19 for
example, vicinal diamines.20 The optically active product
such as 3a was readily converted into the corresponding
N-protected 1,2-diamine 4a in good yield by zinc-mediated
reduction21 without loss of enantioselectivity (Scheme 1).
Table 3. Substrate Scope for the Catalytic Enantioselective
Aza-Henry Reaction of Ketoiminesa
Scheme 1. Conversion of the Product to 1,2-Diamine
entry
R1
Ph (2a)
2-FC6H4 (2b)
4-FC6H4 (2c)
4-ClC6H4 (2d)
3-ClC6H4 (2e)
4-BrC6H4 (2f)
4-MeC6H4 (2g)
R2 time (d) yield of 3 (%)b ee (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
5
5
5
5
5
39 (64)
50 (80)
48 (75)
58 (81)
70 (80)
61 (83)
21 (42)
30
44
49
36
47
88 (88)d
91 (90)
92 (91)
93 (92)
96 (96)
92 (92)
90 (90)
88
87
85
92
88
5
5
This method leads to a simple procedure for the synthesis
of a new class of optically active vicinal diamines with a
quaternary stereogenic center.
4-MeOC6H4 (2h) Me
2-MeOC6H4 (2i) Me
3-MeOC6H4 (2j) Me
10
10
10
10
10
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
In conclusion, the first catalytic enantioselective aza-Henry
reaction of ketoimines has been realized using a simple chiral
N,N′-dioxide-Cu(I) complex as catalyst. It performed well
over a range of substrates to give the desired products in
moderate to good yields (up to 83%) with high enantiose-
lectivities (up to 96% ee). The optically active products can
be easily converted into chiral vicinal diamines with a
quaternary stereogenic center. Further studies of the reaction
mechanism as well as improvement of the reaction efficiency
are in progress.
Ph (2k)
Et
2-naphthyl (2l)
2-furyl (2m)
2-thienyl (2n)
Ph(CH2)2 (2o)
cyclohexyl (2p)
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
51 (82)
43
91 (91)
78
10
5
10
47 (76)
35
71 (71)
83
17e Ph (2a)
5
33
87
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were carried out with 1e (0.02 mmol),
(CuOTf)2·C7H8 (0.01 mmol), 4 Å MS (20 mg), 2 (0.1 mmol) and CH3NO2
(0.1 mL) in PhOEt (0.5 mL) at 0 °C. b Isolated yield. The reaction time for
the data in parentheses was 10 days. c Determined by HPLC using
commercial chiral columns. The reaction time for the data in parentheses
was 10 days. d The absolute configuration was determined to be S. See
Supporting Information for details. e Reaction was carried out on 1 mmol
scale.
(11) For recent reviews on asymmetric synthesis of quaternary stereo-
centers, see: (a) Douglas, C. J.; Overman, L. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2004, 101, 5363. (b) Christoffers, J.; Baro, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005,
347, 1473. (c) Trost, B. M.; Jiang, C. Synthesis 2006, 369. (d) Hatano, M.;
Ishihara, K. Synthesis 2008, 1647. (e) Cozzi, P. G.; Hilgraf, R.; Zimmer-
mann, N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 5969, and references therein. See also
ref 13.
or electron-donating substitutents (85-96% ee; Table 3,
entries 1-10), while substrates with electron-donating
groups provided lower reactivity and extended reaction
time was needed (Table 3, entries 7-10). The more
sterically hindered substrates such as 2k and 2l could also
gave the corresponding products in moderate yields with
high enantioselectivities (Table 3, entries 11 and 12). In
the cases of heteroaromatic ketoimines 2m and 2n, the
reaction was obviously affected by the heteroatom of the
heteroaromatic ring, and 2m afforded much better result
than 2n (Table 3, entry 13 vs 14). The reaction was also
applicable to primary alkyl-substituted ketoimine 2o and
aliphatic ketoimine 2p (Table 3, entries 15 and 16). In
addition, preliminary investigation showed that the reac-
tion could be carried out on 1 mmol scale without decrease
in enantioselectivity (Table 3, entry 17). Other nitroalkanes
including nitroethane and nitropropane were also tested
under the optimized conditions, but only trace of products
could be detected.
(12) (a) García Ruano, J. L.; Topp, M.; Lo´pez-Cantarero, J.; Alema´n,
J.; Remuin˜a´n, M. J.; Cid, M. B. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4407. (b) Pahadi, N. K.;
Ube, H.; Terada, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8700. (c) Wang, L. W.;
Tan, C.; Liu, X. H.; Feng, X. M. Synlett 2008, 2075.
(13) For recent reviews on catalytic enantioselective addition of ke-
toimines, see: (a) Riant, O.; Hannedouche, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5,
873. (b) Shibasaki, M.; Kanai, M. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 2853.
(14) For reviews of chiral N-oxides, see: (a) Chelucci, G.; Murineddu,
G.; Pinna, G. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 1373. (b) Malkov, A. V.;
Kocˇovsky´, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 29, and references therein.
(15) For recent examples of enantioselective reactions catalyzed by
N-oxide-metal complexes, see: (a) Zhang, X.; Chen, D. H.; Liu, X. H.;
Feng, X. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5227. (b) Zheng, K.; Qin, B.; Liu,
X. H.; Feng, X. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8478. (c) Qin, B.; Xiao, X.;
Liu, X. H.; Huang, J. L.; Wen, Y. H.; Feng, X. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
9323. (d) Huang, J. L.; Wang, J.; Chen, X. H.; Wen, Y. H.; Liu, X. H.;
Feng, X. M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 287. (e) Gao, B.; Wen, Y. H.;
Yang, Z. G.; Huang, X.; Liu, X. H.; Feng, X. M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008,
350, 385. (f) Shang, D. J.; Xin, J. G.; Liu, Y. L.; Zhou, X.; Liu, X. H.;
Feng, X. M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 630. (g) Yu, Z. P.; Liu, X. H.; Dong,
Z. H.; Xie, M. S.; Feng, X. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1308. (h)
Li, X.; Liu, X. H.; Fu, Y. Z.; Wang, L. J.; Zhou, L.; Feng, X. M. Chem.
Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4796. (i) Kokubo, M.; Ogawa, C.; Kobayashi, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6909. (j) Yang, X.; Zhou, X.; Lin, L. L.; Chang,
L.; Liu, X. H.; Feng, X. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7079. For
other examples, see also ref 14.
(9) (a) Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Laso, A.; Lo´pez, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 17622. (b) Fini, F.; Sgarzani, V.; Pettersen, D.; Herrera,
R. P.; Bernardi, L.; Ricci, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7975. (c)
Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Linden, A.; Lo´pez, R.; Mu´gica-Mendiola, I.; Oiarbide,
M.; Palomo, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7955.
(16) Ligands derived from other chiral amino acids such as L-proline
and (S)-ramipril acid gave very poor results (less than 20% ee).
(17) The role of 4 Å molecular sieves in the reaction has not yet been
established. Using other additives, including 3 Å and 5 Å molecular sieves,
was less efficient.
(18) Imines with other N-protecting groups, such as N-phenyl and
N-diphenylphosphinoyl ketoimines, were also tested, but no reaction
occurred.
(10) (a) Robak, M. T.; Trincado, M.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 15110. (b) Rueping, M.; Antonchick, A. P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
1731. (c) Uraguchi, D.; Koshimoto, K.; Ooi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 10878.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 22, 2008
5307