A R T I C L E S
Linker et al.
Chart 1. Glycals 1a-w with Various Configurations and Protecting Groups
manganese(III).8 Interestingly, the oxidation of glycals with
hypervalent iodine reagents affects only the allylic position and
leaves the double bond intact.9
a reactivity remarkably different from that of simple cyclic enol
ethers, which has been disregarded previously.
Herein, we describe a comprehensive study on the oxidation
stability of variously substituted glycals 1 by a combination of
cyclic voltammetry (CV), calculation of HOMO energies, and
product distribution studies from radical additions. The present
results establish a strong influence of protecting groups and of
substitution patterns both in the allylic 3-position and in position
1 of the double bond on the oxidation potentials. Furthermore,
our studies provide a rationale for the unusual reactivity of
glycals compared to simple enol ethers, demonstrating their
value as stable starting materials for radical and other oxidative
transformations.
During the course of our investigations on transition-metal-
mediated radical reactions,10 we became interested in the
addition of malonates to various glycals 1 in the presence of
cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate (CAN).11 This reaction is similar
to Lemieux’s azidonitration,12 but provides easy access to C-2-
branched carbohydrates, a valuable complement to the cyclo-
propanation of glycals.13 More recently, we applied this
methodology to other CH acidic radical precursors (e.g.,
nitromethane or nitro esters)14 and to unsaturated carbohydrates
with benzyl protecting groups.15 In all cases, the double bond
of glycals 1 was not directly affected by CAN, although this
ox
Results
reagent has an oxidation power (E1/2 ) 1.52-1.60 V vs
NHE)16 sufficient to oxidize unsubstituted 2,3-dihydropyran (Epa
) 1.60 V vs NHE).17 Furthermore, the addition of radicals to
2,3-dihydropyran was not successful.8d Thus, glycals 1 exhibit
Synthesis of Glycals 1. To investigate the oxidation stability
of a broad variety of glycals, we synthesized more than 20
different 1,2-unsaturated carbohydrate derivatives. The simple
O-acetyl-protected glycals 1a-d were easily available from the
parent glycosyl bromides for pentoses, hexoses, and disaccha-
rides on a large scale via known procedures.2,18 For further
functionalized systems, we focused on derivatives of D-glucal
and D-galactal, which furnished high yields and selectivities in
radical additions in our previous studies.11 Thus, the protecting
groups were easily exchanged by literature procedures,19 and
glycals 1e-j were obtained in one- or two-step reactions from
the corresponding tri-O-acetyl-D-glycals 1a and 1b (Chart 1,
Supporting Information). To investigate the influence of various
substituents adjacent to the double bond, we altered the
structures in the 1- and 3-positions of the glycals requiring some
more laborious transformations. The 3-O-acetyl group of glucal
1a was selectively removed by enzymatic saponification to give
1k,20 and subsequent reaction with acid chlorides afforded esters
(8) (a) Fife, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1084–1089. (b) Piancatelli,
G.; Scettri, A.; D’Auria, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 3483–3484.
(c) Baskaran, S.; Islam, I.; Raghavan, M.; Chandrasekaran, S. Chem.
Lett. 1987, 1175–1178. (d) Narasaka, K.; Mochizuki, T.; Hayakawa,
S. Chem. Lett. 1994, 1705–1708.
(9) (a) Kirschning, A.; Dra¨ger, G.; Harders, J. Synlett 1993, 289–290. (b)
Kirschning, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2267–2274. (c) Kirschning,
A.; Hary, U.; Plumeier, C.; Ries, M.; Rose, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 519–528.
(10) (a) Linker, U.; Kersten, B.; Linker, T. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9917–
9926. (b) Linker, T.; Linker, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
902–904. (c) Linker, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 661, 159–167.
(11) (a) Linker, T.; Hartmann, K.; Sommermann, T.; Scheutzow, D.;
Ruckdeschel, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1730–1732.
(b) Linker, T.; Sommermann, T.; Kahlenberg, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 9377–9384. (c) Gyo´llai, V.; Schanzenbach, D.; Somsa´k,
L.; Linker, T. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1294–1295.
(12) Lemieux, R. U.; Ratcliffe, R. M. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 1244–1251.
(13) Review: Cousins, G. S.; Hoberg, J. O. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2000, 29,
165–174.
(14) (a) Sommermann, T.; Kim, B. K.; Peters, K.; Peters, E.-M.; Linker,
T. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2624–2625. (b) Elamparuthi, E.; Linker, T.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1361–1364.
(18) (a) Helferich, B.; Mulcahy, E. N.; Ziegler, H. Chem. Ber. 1954, 87,
233–237. (b) Somsa´k, L.; Ne´meth, I. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1993, 12,
679–684. (c) Shull, B. K.; Wu, Z.; Koreeda, M. J. Carbohydr. Chem.
1996, 15, 955–964. (d) Mitchell, S. A.; Pratt, M. R.; Hruby, V. R.;
Polt, R. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2327–2342.
(15) (a) Yin, J.; Spindler, J.; Linker, T. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2712–2713.
(b) Yin, J.; Sommermann, T.; Linker, T. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
10152–10167.
(19) (a) Overend, W. G.; Shafizadeh, F.; Stacey, M. J. Chem. Soc. 1950,
671–677. (b) Chmielewski, M.; Kaluza, Z. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 167,
143–152. (c) Szeja, W.; Fokt, I.; Grynkiewicz, G. Recl. TraV. Chim.
Pays-Bas 1989, 108, 224–226. (d) Chmielewski, M.; Fokt, I.; Grodner,
J.; Grynkiewicz, G.; Szeja, W. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1989, 8, 735–
744. (e) Madhusudan, S. K.; Agnihotri, G.; Negi, D. S.; Misra, A. K.
Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1373–1377. (f) Ghosh, R.; Chakraborty,
A.; Maiti, D. K.; Puranik, V. G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1061–1064.
(20) Holla, W. E. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1990, 9, 113–119.
(16) (a) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Weast, R. C., Ed.; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1986. (b) Fokin, A. A.; Peleshanko, S. A.;
Gunchenko, P. A.; Gusev, D. V.; Schreiner, P. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 3357–3362.
(17) (a) Linker, T.; Schmittel, M. Radikale und Radikalionen in der
Organischen Synthese; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998. (b)
Huo, C.; Jia, X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Li.; Lu¨, J.; Liu, Z.-L. Synlett 2004,
251–254.
9
16004 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 47, 2008