seco-acid 14. Cyclisation of 14 under Yamaguchi conditions17
provided the 14-membered macrolactone 15 cleanly (80%). At
this stage, we had completed a formal synthesis of neopelto-
lide, with all spectroscopic data for lactone 15 being in good
agreement with that reported by Scheidt and co-workers (see
the ESIw).5 All that remained for the endgame was reduction
of the ketone 15 to the equatorial alcohol 2 (NaBH4, MeOH),
followed by a Mitsunobu esterification reaction with the side
chain acid 3,10 as employed by other groups,5–8 providing
(+)-neopeltolide (1) in 52% yield. The spectroscopic data and
5 D. W. Custar, T. P. Zabawa and K. A. Scheidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 804.
6 S. K. Woo, M. S. Kwon and E. Lee, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 3242.
7 H. Fuwa, S. Naito, T. Goto and M. Sasaki, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2008, 47, 4737.
8 O. A. Ulanovskaya, J. Janjic, M. Suzuki, S. S. Sabharwal, P. T.
Schumacker, S. J. Kron and S. A. Kozmin, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2008,
4, 418.
9 V. V. Vintonyak and M. E. Maier, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 1239.
10 The acid 3 was prepared in three steps: (i) H2, Lindlar catalyst,
quinoline, EtOAc; (ii) DMP, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; (iii) NaClO2,
NaH2PO4, 2-methyl-2-butene, tBuOH, H2O; 94% overall) from
the oxazole intermediate shown below, as used in our leucascan-
drolide A total synthesis. I. Paterson and M. Tudge, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 343; I. Paterson and M. Tudge, Tetra-
hedron, 2003, 59, 6833
20
specific rotation, [a]D +22.1 (c 0.06, MeOH), obtained for
synthetic 1 were in full accord with those reported for the
natural product (see the ESIw).2
In summary, a concise and efficient total synthesis of the
potent antiproliferative macrolide (+)-neopeltolide (1) has
been achieved in 18 steps (longest linear sequence) and 5.8%
overall yield, involving a Jacobsen hetero Diels–Alder reaction
as the key step. Notably, our strategy involves the use of only
achiral starting materials, with four of the six stereocentres
(C3, C7, C9 and C13) being introduced using asymmetric
catalysis, a tactic which should be readily adaptable to the
synthesis of a variety of structural analogues.
11 A. G. Dossetter, T. F. Jamison and E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2398.
12 M. Kitamura, M. Tokunaga, T. Ohkuma and R. Noyori, Org.
Synth., 1992, 71, 1; R. Noyori, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41,
2108.
13 For a similar sequence performed in the enantiomeric series, see:
L.-S. Deng, X.-P. Huang and G. Zhao, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71,
4625.
14 H. C. Brown, P. K. Jadhav and P. T. Perumal, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1984, 25, 5111.
15 We also examined an olefin cross-metathesis reaction between 8 and
methyl crotonate to give 9 directly; however, this proved to be slow
and low yielding. While the two geometric isomers of 9 could be
separated chromatographically, this turned out to be unnecessary.
16 S. G. Ouellet, J. B. Tuttle and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 32.
Financial support was provided by the EPSRC (EP/
F025734/1) and Merck Research Laboratories.
Notes and references
1 (a) K.-S. Yeung and I. Paterson, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 4237; (b) I.
Paterson and E. A. Anderson, Science, 2005, 310, 451.
2 A. E. Wright, J. C. Botelho, E. Guzman, D. Harmody, P. Linley,
P. J. McCarthy, T. P. Pitts, S. A. Pomponi and J. K Reed, J. Nat.
Prod., 2007, 70, 412.
3 M. D’Ambrosio, A. Guerriero, C. Debitus and F. Pietra, Helv.
Chim. Acta, 1996, 79, 51.
4 W. Youngsaye, J. T. Lowe, F. Pohlki, P. Ralifo and J. S. Panek,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 9211.
17 J. Inanaga, K. Hirata, H. Saeki, T. Katsuki and M. Yamaguchi,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1979, 52, 1989.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
4710 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 4708–4710