A. G. Cole et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5420–5423
5423
Table 2
2. de Lecea, L.; Kilduff, T. S.; Peyron, C.; Gao, X.; Foye, P. E.; Danielson, P. E.;
Fukuhara, C.; Battenberg, E. L.; Gautvik, V. T.; Bartlett, F. S. 2nd.; Frankel, W. N.;
van den Pol, A. N.; Bloom, F. E.; Gautvik, K. M.; Sutcliffe, J. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1998, 95, 322.
3. Zhu, Y.; Miwa, Y.; Yamanaka, A.; Yada, T.; Shibahara, M.; Abe, Y.; Sakurai, T.;
Goto, K. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2003, 92, 259.
Propylene-based OX2-R antagonists
O
R3
N
O
O
O
R1
4. Marcus, J. N.; Aschkenasi, C. J.; Lee, C. E.; Chemelli, R. M.; Saper, C. B.;
Yanagisawa, M.; Elmquist, J. K. J. Comp. Neurol. 2001, 435, 6.
5. Chemelli, R. M.; Willie, J. T.; Sinton, C. M.; Elmquist, J. K.; Scammell, T.; Lee, C.;
Richardson, J. A.; Williams, S. C.; Xiong, Y.; Kisanuki, Y.; Fitch, T. E.; Nakazato,
M.; Hammer, R. E.; Saper, C. B.; Yanagisawa, M. Cell 1999, 98, 437.
6. Willie, J. T.; Chemelli, R. M.; Sinton, C. M.; Yanagisawa, M. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
2001, 24, 429.
7. Willie, J. T.; Chemelli, R. M.; Sinton, C. M.; Tokita, S.; Williams, S. C.; Kisanuki, Y.
Y.; Marcus, J. N.; Lee, C.; Elmquist, J. K.; Kohlmeier, K. A.; Leonard, C. S.;
Richardson, J. A.; Hammer, R. E.; Yanagisawa, M. Neuron 2003, 38, 715.
8. Hagan, J. J.; Leslie, R. A.; Patel, S.; Evans, M. L.; Wattam, T. A.; Holmes, S.;
Benham, C. D.; Taylor, S. G.; Routledge, C.; Hemmati, P.; Munton, R. P.;
Ashmeade, T. E.; Shah, A. S.; Hatcher, J. P.; Hatcher, P. D.; Jones, D. N.; Smith, M.
I.; Piper, D. C.; Hunter, A. J.; Porter, R. A.; Upton, N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
1999, 96, 10911.
Compound
R1
R3
OX2-R pIC50 SEMa
7.29 0.03
23 (R12, R31)
N
H
F
F
24 (R12, R310)
6.97 0.06
6.88 0.07
N
H
S
9. Methippara, M. M.; Alam, M. N.; Szymusiak, R.; McGinty, D. Neuroreport 2000,
11, 3423.
25 (R12, R314)
N
H
10. Piper, D. C.; Upton, N.; Smith, M. I.; Hunter, A. J. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000, 12, 726.
11. Huang, Z. L.; Qu, W. M.; Li, W. D.; Mochizuki, T.; Eguchi, N.; Watanabe, T.;
Urade, Y.; Hayaishi, O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 9965.
12. Rodgers, R. J.; Halford, J. C.; Nunes de Souza, R. L.; Canto de Souza, A. L.; Piper, D.
C.; Arch, J. R.; Upton, N.; Porter, R. A.; Johns, A.; Blundell, J. E. Eur. J. Neurosci.
2001, 13, 1444.
a
pIC50 standard error mean upon challenge with 20 nM Ox-A, based on P3
independent determinations.
13. Lin, L.; Faraco, J.; Li, R.; Kadotani, H.; Rogers, W.; Lin, X.; Qiu, X.; de Jong, P. J.;
Nishino, S.; Mignot, E. Cell 1999, 98, 365.
14. Reilly, C. E. J. Neurol. 1999, 246, 985.
15. Hungs, M.; Fan, J.; Lin, L.; Lin, X.; Maki, R. A.; Mignot, E. Genome Res. 2001, 11,
531.
16. Peyron, C.; Faraco, J.; Rogers, W.; Ripley, B.; Overeem, S.; Charnay, Y.;
Nevsimalova, S.; Aldrich, M.; Reynolds, D.; Albin, R.; Li, R.; Hungs, M.;
Pedrazzoli, M.; Padigaru, M.; Kucherlapati, M.; Fan, J.; Maki, R.; Lammers, G.
J.; Bouras, C.; Kucherlapati, R.; Nishino, S.; Mignot, E. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 991.
17. Nishino, S.; Ripley, B.; Overeem, S.; Lammers, G. J.; Mignot, E. Lancet 2000, 355,
39.
18. Thannickal, T. C.; Moore, R. Y.; Nienhuis, R.; Ramanathan, L.; Gulyani, S.;
Aldrich, M.; Cornford, M.; Siegel, J. M. Neuron 2000, 27, 469.
19. Schuld, A.; Hebebrand, J.; Geller, F.; Pollmacher, T. Lancet 2000, 355, 1274.
20. Hara, J.; Beuckmann, C. T.; Nambu, T.; Willie, J. T.; Chemelli, R. M.; Sinton, C. M.;
Sugiyama, F.; Yagami, K.; Goto, K.; Yanagisawa, M.; Sakurai, T. Neuron 2001, 30,
345.
son to the propylene-based amino ether (23–25) is also evident from
the synthesized compounds. Alkylation to provide the tertiary
amino system as determined by R3 gives compounds of excellent po-
tency (IC50 < 30 nM) for R31 (benzyl, 15), R34 (4-fluorobenzyl, 16)
and R310 (3,4-difluorobenzyl, 17). However, based on the screening
data, a number of substitutions appear to be tolerated at the R3 posi-
tion, providing the potential for further optimization and the inves-
tigation of components that may provide increased antagonist
activity. It is noteworthy that the 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl substituent
(Ar4), was present in all active compounds. Minor deviation from the
3,4-dimethoxy phenyl system to provide the 3-methoxy, 4-methoxy
and 3,4-methylenedioxy analogs resulted in compounds exhibiting
21. Brisbare-Roch, C.; Dingemanse, J.; Koberstein, R.; Hoever, P.; Aissaoui, H.;
Flores, S.; Mueller, C.; Nayler, O.; van Gerven, J.; de Haas, S. L.; Hess, P.; Qiu, C.;
Buchmann, S.; Scherz, M.; Weller, T.; Fischli, W.; Clozel, M.; Jenck, F. Nat. Med.
2007, 13, 150.
22. (a) Ohlmeyer, M. H. J.; Swanson, R. N.; Dillard, L.; Reader, J. C.; Asouline, G.;
Kobayishi, R.; Wigler, M.; Still, W. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 10922;
(b) Nestler, H. P.; Bartlett, P. A.; Still, W. C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4723.
IC50 values of > 2 lM.
In conclusion, potent antagonists of OX2-R were identified in a
ꢀ140,000 member combinatorial library using a 384-well high-
throughput functional calcium-mobilization screen. Correlation
between library screening data (% inhibition) and measured IC50
values was excellent. Analysis of the specific substituents present
in the active compounds identifies areas of the molecules where
key functionality is required. The toleration of multiple tertiary
amine substituents in conjunction with varying chain lengths
and substitutions of the aminoalcohol-based spacer provides the
opportunity for a number of cyclic constraints to be applied to
the molecules. The optimization of this series of compounds as
OX2-R antagonists and the scope of constraint applications will
be reported elsewhere.
23. HEK293/OX2-R cells were seeded at 20,000 cells (50
-lysine)-treated 384-well plates (Costar, black clear-bottom cell culture-
lL) per well in poly-
(D
treated) in culture medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing
10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 1% Gluta-Max (Invitrogen), 1%
nonessential amino acids, 1% 1 U/mL Penicillin/1
sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, and 200 g/mL G418). After 24 h at 37 °C, 5%
CO2, culture medium was removed and replaced with 25 L per well of dye/
lg/mL Streptomycin, 1 mM
l
l
buffer mix (equal parts of 2ꢁ concentrated Molecular Devices Calcium 3 no-
wash dye and buffer consisting of Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution, 20 mM HEPES,
pH 7.5, 0.2% BSA), with probenecid to a final concentration of 2.5 mM. Plates
were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then equilibrated to room
temperature for 30–90 min. Test compounds were diluted in Hanks’ Balanced
Salt Solution (HBSS), 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.1% BSA, 2.5 mM probenecid
(assay buffer), with 2% DMSO. Prior to each assay run, FLIPR 384 tips
(Molecular Devices) were presoaked in 1% BSA/HBSS/20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5.
References and notes
For the antagonist assay, 12.5
l
L test compound was added to dye-loaded cells
1. Sakurai, T.; Amemiya, A.; Ishii, M.; Matsuzaki, I.; Chemelli, R. M.; Tanaka, H.;
Williams, S. C.; Richardson, J. A.; Kozlowski, G. P.; Wilson, S.; Arch, J. R.;
Buckingham, R. E.; Haynes, A. C.; Carr, S. A.; Annan, R. S.; McNulty, D. E.; Liu, W.
S.; Terrett, J. A.; Elshourbagy, N. A.; Bergsma, D. J.; Yanagisawa, M. Cell 1998, 92,
573.
in the FLIPR384, followed within 30 min by addition of 12.5
lL of human orexin
A (Bachem) in assay buffer to a final concentration of 20 nM. Fluorescence was
monitored for 125 s after additions.