AMINOMETHYLATED DERIVATIVES
69
The structures of these substances have been estabꢀ nylphenols in Mꢀ12 engine oil (at a concentration of
lished by NMR spectroscopy.
6ꢀDiethylaminomethylꢀ2ꢀpropenylphenol (I): yield
88.3%, nD20 1.5114; d420 1003.6 kg/m3, 1Н NMR (aceꢀ
1–2%) and TSꢀ1 jet fuel (at a concentration of 0.3–
0.5%) were tested by zone diffusion assay according to
GOST (State Standard) 9.052ꢀ88 and GOST 9.082ꢀ
77. The following microorganisms were studied:
tone d6,
δ
, ppm): 1.18 t (6Н, 2СН3); 1.89 d (3Н, СН3);
Mycobacterium lacticolium
, Staphyilococcus albus,
2.58 (4Н, 2СН2); 3.75 s (2H, СН2ꢀN); 6.29 m (1H,
q
E. coli, Mucor Pinicillium, and Aspergillus niger
,
.
CH=); 6.63 (1H, CH=); 6.65–7.3 (3H, aromatic);
10.5 s (1H, OH). 13C NMR spectrum: 12.3; 18.7; 46.8;
57.1; 118.7; 123.1; 123.9; 124.6; 125.2; 126.8; 128.5;
157.5.
6ꢀPiperidinomethylꢀ2ꢀpropenylphenol (II): yield
76.0%; nD20 1.5085; d420 1043.4 kg/m3; 1Н NMR (aceꢀ
Meatꢀpeptone agar (MPA) and wort agar (WA)
were taken to cultivate bacterial cultures and fungi,
respectively. In order to compare and detect the antiꢀ
microbial activity of these compounds, 8ꢀhydroxꢀ
yquinoline, a wellꢀknown antimicrobial additive for
lubricants and fuels, was used. Inoculation and cultiꢀ
vation were carried out as described in [6]. The effiꢀ
ciency of the antimicrobial action of the compounds
was determined in terms of the diameter of the microꢀ
organism growth inhibition area.
Microorganisms were inoculated in Petri dishes on
the surface of an agarized culture medium; then, pits
of a 4ꢀ to 5ꢀmm depth were made with a sterile 10ꢀmm
drill bit into which 0.3–0.5 ml of the samples were
introduced. The dishes were subsequently placed in a
thermostat and left to stay at 29–30°С over 2 days (for
tone d6,
СН3); 3.59
δ
, ppm): 1.35–1.71 m (6Н, 3СН2); 1.9
d (3Н,
s
(2Н,СН2–N); 6.15 m (1H, CH=); 6.62
(1H, CH=); 6.55–7.2 (3H, aromatic); 10.4 s (1H,
ÎH). 13C NMR spectrum: 18.9; 24.8; 26.7; 44.9; 62.8;
118.6; 123.4; 124.1; 124.8; 125.2; 128.1; 128.6; 156.9.
6ꢀmorpholinomethylꢀ2ꢀpropenylphenol (III): yield
80.7%, nD20 1.5085; d420 1043.4 kg/m3; 1Н NMR (aceꢀ
tone d6,
N(CН2)2); 3.65
δ
, ppm): 1.89 d (3Н, СН3); 2.55
t (4Н,
t
(4Н, О(СН2)2); 3.66
s (2Н, bacterial growth) or 3–4 days (for fungi).
СН2⎯N); 6.3 t (1H, CH=); 6.67 (1H, CH=); 6.7–7.4
13
(3H, aromatic); 10.55 s (1H, OH). C NMR: 18.3;
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
43.4; 62.3; 66.7; 118.3; 118.9; 121.8; 125.7; 126.1;
126.9; 127.4; 135.8
The results of the study show that the yields of the
desired compounds vary from 65.0 to 88.3% dependꢀ
ing on the nature of the reactant amines and phenols.
The greatest yields can be achieved with the use of
morpholine or diethylamine and 2ꢀpropenylphenol.
The aminomethylated 2ꢀpropenylꢀ and 4ꢀisopropeꢀ
nylphenol derivatives and the reactant alkenylphenols
were investigated by the NMR spectroscopy techꢀ
nique. It was found that these phenols experience
intermolecular hydrogen bonding and the products’
Mannich bases contain a rather strong intramolecular
bond, supposedly due to the electron pair of the amiꢀ
2ꢀDiethylaminomethylꢀ4ꢀisopropenylphenol (IV)
yield 70%; nD20 1.5492; d420 1002.2 kg/m3; 1Н NMR
(acetone d6, , ppm): 1.04 t (6Н, 2СН3); 2.05 с (3Н,
СН3–С); 2.57 (4Н, N(CН2)2); 3.5 (2Н, N–CH2–
:
δ
q
s
Ar); 4.91 and 5.13 AB (2Н, СН2=); 6.8–7.2 (3Н,
С6Н3); 8.9 (1H, OH).
2ꢀPiperidinomethylꢀ4ꢀisopropenylphenol (V): yield
65.0%; nD20 1.5612; d420 1022.8 kg/m3; 1Н NMR (aceꢀ
tone d6, , ppm): 1.71 m (6H, of the 3СН2 cycle),
δ
nomethyl nitrogen atom located in the oꢀposition with
2.01 s (3Н, СН3–С); 2.62 m (4H, of the N(CН2)2
cycle); 3.49 s (2Н, NCН2–Ar); 4.90 and 5.12 AB (2Н,
СН2=); 6.96–7.3 (3Н, С6Н3); 9.2 (1H, OH).
2ꢀMorpholinomethylꢀ4ꢀisopropenylphenol
yield 75.7%; nD20 1.5645; d420 1021.8 kg/m3; 1Н NMR
respect to the phenol hydroxyl and the OH hydrogen.
The 1H NMR spectra of dilute solutions of 2ꢀproꢀ
penylꢀ and 4ꢀisopropenylphenols in CCl4 feature a
shift of hydroxyl proton signals from 6.5 to 4.8 ppm.
However, no such concentrationꢀinduced shift is
(VI):
observed for the oꢀaminomethyl derivatives. Owing to
(acetone d6,
N(CН2)2); 3.45
δ
, ppm): 1.99 s (3Н, СН3); 2.32
(2Н, NCН2⎯Ar); 3.55
m
m
(4Н,
(4Н,
the formation of the N…H intramolecular hydrogen
bond, hydroxyl group signals in these compounds are
detected in the range of 8.9–10.55 ppm.
s
О(СН2)2); 4.8 and 5.12 s (2Н, СН2=); 6.6–7.2 (3H,
aromatic); 9.5 (1H, OH). 13C NMR: 22.3; 53.6; 62.3;
66.7; 109.9; 116.4; 119.9; 126.4; 126.6; 133.1; 143.1;
157.4.
1
Furthermore, H NMR spectroscopic studies of
the aminomethyl derivatives of alkenylphenols up to
the boiling temperature of СCl4 revealed a minor shift
of the hydroxyl group signals, thereby unequivocally
confirming that the intramolecular hydrogen bond is
quite strong [8, 9].
The nature of the aminomethyl moiety in all derivꢀ
atives of both 2ꢀpropenylꢀ and 4ꢀisopropenylphenol
NMR spectroscopy was also used to investigate the
formation of an intermolecular and intramolecular
hydrogen bond in the precursors and products (I–VI)
in the temperature range of 25–70°С and at concenꢀ
trations of 0.1–50% in CCl4
.
The antimicrobial properties of the aminomethyꢀ does not have any significant influence on the strength
lated derivatives of 2ꢀpropenylꢀ and 4ꢀisopropeꢀ of the intramolecular hydrogen bond.
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY Vol. 50
No. 1
2010