C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Obviously, in these cases, the vinylidene rearrangement is much
slower than the alkyne coordination.
vinylidene rearrangement is not parallel with the migratory aptitude
of the substituents. Especially in the series of 1-aryl-2-phenylacety-
lenes, the orders of reactivity and migratory aptitude are opposite
to each other. We consider the rate of the vinylidene formation is
strongly controlled by the stability of the intermediate alkyne
complexes rather than the migratory aptitude of each substituent.
In conclusion, we have developed the first internal alkyne-to-
vinylidene isomerization with high generality by using ruthenium
P3O9 complex 2 and determined the migratory aptitude of alkyl,
aryl, and acyl groups. Detailed mechanisms and synthetic applica-
tions of this reaction are now under investigation.
A preliminary kinetic study on the conversion of 6k to 5k at 70
°C in the presence of excess 4k by means of 31P{1H} NMR clearly
indicated that the reaction obeys first-order kinetics with an apparent
rate constant (k) of 3.09 × 10-5 s-1. This result demonstrated that
the reaction proceeds via an intramolecular process, which is further
supported by the fact that crossover of the alkyne substituents was
not observed in the reactions with unsymmetric alkynes, especially
4f. On the other hand, judging from the normal νNtN value of 3,13
the oxidative addition of an internal alkyne to the 16e
[RuII(P3O9)(dppe)]- fragment to form the (alkyl/aryl)(alkynyl)
complex seems unlikely. Therefore we presume that the present
vinylidene rearrangement involves the 1,2-alkyl/aryl shift of the
intermediary alkyne complex. Theoretical studies on the terminal
alkyne-to-vinylidene rearrangement have also suggested that the
1,2-hydrogen shift mechanism is most commonly operative with a
Ru(II) center.14
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (20037060) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
crystallographic data for 2·3MeOH, 5a·2MeOH, and 6j·2C2H4Cl2 in
CIF format. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
To gain deeper insight into the reaction mechanism, the migratory
aptitude of alkyl, aryl, and acyl groups has been investigated by
13
using 13C-enriched alkynes PhCt CR (4-13C, 25.9% 13C). Migra-
References
tion of the R group gives rise to the R-13C labeled vinylidene
complex (5-R13C), while the Ph migration leads to the ꢀ-13C labeled
product (5-ꢀ13C) (Scheme 2). When complex 1 was reacted with
4a-13C, the 13C{1H} NMR analysis of the reaction mixture indicated
that the 13C content of the R-carbon in the product is 9.84 times as
high as that of ꢀ-carbon, which implies that the ratio of Me and Ph
migration is 94:6 (see Supporting Information). Detailed analysis
of analogous reactions with a series of 4-13C disclosed that the
migratory aptitude of alkyne substituents is in the order CO2Et,
C6H4CO2Et-p > Me > Ph > C6H4Me-p > C6H4OMe-p.
(1) (a) Bruce, M. I. Chem. ReV. 1991, 91, 197–257. (b) Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf,
P. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 311–323. (c) Wakatsuki, Y. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2004, 689, 4092–4109.
(2) Metal Vinylidenes and Allenylidenes in Catalysis; Bruneau, C., Dixneuf,
P. H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008.
(3) (a) Werner, H.; Baum, M.; Schneider, D.; Windmu¨ller, B. Organometallics
1994, 13, 1089–1097. (b) Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E.; Lagunas, M. C.;
Metz, B.; Rieger, A. L.; Rieger, P. H.; Shaw, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 12202–12208. (c) Katayama, H.; Onitsuka, K.; Ozawa, F.
Organometallics 1996, 15, 4642–4645. (d) Werner, H.; Lass, R. W.; Gevert,
O.; Wolf, J. Organometallics 1997, 16, 4077–4088. (e) Jime´nez, M. V.;
Sola, E.; Lahoz, F. J.; Oro, L. A. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2722–2729.
(f) Ilg, K.; Paneque, M.; Poveda, M. L.; Rendo´n, N.; Santos, L. L.; Carmona,
E.; Mereiter, K. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2230–2236.
(4) (a) Venkatesan, K.; Blacque, O.; Fox, T.; Alfonso, M.; Schmalle, H. W.;
Kheradmandan, S.; Berke, H. Organometallics 2005, 24, 920–932. (b)
Venkatesan, K.; Fox, T.; Schmalle, H. W.; Berke, H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
2005, 901–909.
Scheme 2a
(5) Miller, D. C.; Angelici, R. J. Organometallics 1991, 10, 79–89.
(6) Miura, T.; Iwasawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 518–519.
(7) (a) King, P. J.; Knox, S. A. R.; Legge, M. S.; Orpen, A. G.; Wilkinson,
J. N.; Hill, E. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 1547–1548. (b) Shaw,
M. J.; Bryant, S. W.; Rath, N. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 3943–3946.
(8) Bly, R. S.; Zhong, Z.; Kane, C.; Bly, R. K. Organometallics 1994, 13,
899–905.
(9) (a) Yamaguchi, K.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7144–7145. (b) Mori, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mizugaki,
T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. Chem. Commun. 2001, 461–462. (c) Mori, K.;
Hara, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11460–11461.
(10) (a) Kamimura, S.; Kuwata, S.; Iwasaki, M.; Ishii, Y. Dalton Trans. 2003,
2666–2673. (b) Kamimura, S.; Matsunaga, T.; Kuwata, S.; Iwasaki, M.;
Ishii, Y. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 6127–6129. (c) Kamimura, S.; Kuwata,
S.; Iwasaki, M.; Ishii, Y. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 399–401.
(11) Day, V. W.; Eberspacher, T. A.; Klemperer, W. G.; Planalp, R. P.; Schiller,
P. W.; Yagasaki, A.; Zhong, B. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 1629–1637.
(12) (a) Lomprey, J. R.; Selegue, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5518–
5523. (b) Bruce, M. I.; Ellis, B. G.; Low, P. J.; Skelton, B. W.; White,
A. H. Organometallics 2003, 22, 3184–3198. (c) Bustelo, E.; Carbo´, J. J.;
Lledo´s, A.; Mereiter, K.; Puerta, M. C.; Valerga, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 3311–3321.
a Reaction conditions: C2H4Cl2, 70 °C.
The above result clearly shows that electron-withdrawing groups
enhance the migratory aptitude. Quite interestingly, this order is
opposite to that of common organic nucleophilic rearrangements,
in which the migrating group behaves as a formal carbanion.15
Although we must await further investigation to elucidate the
detailed reaction mechanism, the above result seems to suggest a
mechanism involving the electrophilic 1,2-shift of the carbon
substituents. This interpretation is in good agreement with the
theoretical calculation results on the vinylidene rearrangement of
a terminal alkyne at RuCl2(PH3)2, where the migrating hydrogen
behaves as a proton.14a,16 In contrast, however, it should be noted
that only Ph group migration has been observed in the vinylidene-
to-alkyne rearrangement of [Cp(CO)2FedCdC(Me)Ph]+ (Cp ) η5-
C5H5).8 It is also interesting to note that the reaction rate of the
(13) Amoroso, D.; Jabri, A.; Yap, G. P. A.; Gusev, D. G.; dos Santos, E. N.;
Fogg, D. E. Organometallics 2004, 23, 4047–4054.
(14) (a) Wakatsuki, Y.; Koga, N.; Yamazaki, H.; Morokuma, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 8105–8111. (b) Tokunaga, M.; Suzuki, T.; Koga, N.;
Fukushima, T.; Horiuchi, A.; Wakatsuki, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
11917–11924. (c) Cadierno, V.; Gamasa, M. P.; Gimeno, J.; Gonza´lez-
Bernardo, C.; Pe´rez-Carren˜o, E.; Garc´ıa-Granda, S. Organometallics 2001,
20, 5177–5188. (d) De Angelis, F.; Sgamellotti, A.; Re, N. Organometallics
2002, 21, 5944–5950.
(15) Smith, M. B.; March, J. In March’s AdVanced Organic Chemistry:
Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:
New York, 2001; pp 1384-1386.
(16) This point has recently been discussed contradictorily on the basis of a
kinetic study of the vinylidene-to-alkyne rearrangement at an indenylru-
thenium complex. Bassetti, M.; Cadierno, V.; Gimeno, J.; Pasquini, C.
Organometallics 2008, 27, 5009–5016.
JA8080567
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 50, 2008 16857