Synthesis of (P2)Pt(dmit). Bu2Sn(dmit)18 (0.5 mmol, 220 mg) and
(P2)PtCl2(0.5 mmol, 430 mg) were dissolved in acetone (20 mL) with
stirring for 3 h. The red solution was evaporated and separated by column
chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3). The red band was collected, dried under
reduced pressure and crystallized from CHCl3–MeOH. Yield 75% (370
mg). MALDI-TOF (m/z): 992.0402 (M+ + 1). FT-IR (KBr, cm-1) 3056
=
(Ar C–H), 2984 (–CH3), 1627 (C C), 1466, 1435 (Ar ip str), 1098 (P–Ph
str), 1056 (C S), 743 (oop CH def), 690, 548, 520 (oop ring def). UV-Vis
=
(CH3CN, nm, emax ¥ 104 M-1 cm-1) 196 (1.96), 228 (sh, 0.64), 272 (sh, 0.23),
1
326 (sh, 0.06), 452 (sh, 0.02), 460 (0.02). H NMR (CDCl3, d ppm) 7.77
(8H, m) 7.53 (12H, m) 1.90 (6H, s). 31P{ H} NMR (CDCl3, H3PO4, d ppm)
1
-33.86 (1JPt–P = 2839 Hz).
§ X-Ray data collections were performed on an APEXII, Bruker-AXS
diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo-Ka radiation (l =
˚
0.71073 A) at 100 K. Structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS-
97) and refined by full matrix least-squares methods (SHELXL-97).
Absorption correction was applied. Hydrogen atoms were introduced at
calculated positions (riding model), included in structure factor calcula-
tions, and not refined. Crystal data for (P2)Pt(dmit): C35H26P2PtS9·CHCl3,
M = 1111.5 g mol-1, crystal dimensions 0.58 ¥ 0.11 ¥ 0.06 mm, monoclinic,
˚
space group P21/n, a = 10.2717(6), b = 26.2907(17), c = 15.3070(11) A,
◦
3
b = 96.911(3) , V = 4103.6(5) A , Z = 4, rcalcd = 1.799 g cm-3, F(000) =
˚
Fig. 5 Decomposition of the experimental absorption spectra.
2184, m = 4.179 mm-1, T = 100 K, 2qmax = 55.14. Final results (for 490
parameters) were R1 = 0.0302, wR2 = 0.0636 and S = 1.015 for 8019
reflections with I > 2s(I).
the present stage of our investigations, it is difficult to assess
if the small potential difference between the two first oxidation
waves is only a consequence of the inherent dissymmetry of the
system or if it is attributable to an electrostatic interaction between
the two redox centres. We can already anticipate a rather weak
interaction between the radical species since: (i) the two p systems
are connected through the orthogonal P→Pt s bonds and (ii) the
radical cation on the TTF side is preferentially localized on the
outer 4,5-dimethyl-1,3-dithiole ring, as shown by the asymmetry of
the HOMO - 1 coefficients on the TTF core (Fig. 2), a behaviour
1 P. Batail, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 4887.
2 E. Coronado and P. Day, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 5419.
3 F. Setifi, L. Ouahab, S. Golhen, Y. Yoshida and G. Saito, Inorg. Chem.,
2003, 42, 1791; N. Avarvari and M. Fourmigue´, Chem. Commun., 2004,
1300; S. -X. Liu, C. Ambrus, S. Dolder, A. Neels, G. Labat and S.
Decurtins, J. Low Temp. Phys., 2006, 142, 457.
4 M. Fourmigue´ and P. Batail, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1992, 129, 29.
5 T. Devic, P. Batail, M. Fourmigue´ and N. Avarvari, Inorg. Chem., 2004,
43, 3136.
6 N. Avarvari, D. Martin and M. Fourmigue´, J. Organomet. Chem., 2002,
643–644, 292.
7 N. Avarvari and M. Fourmigue´, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1300.
8 C. Gouverd, F. Biaso, L. Cataldo, T. Berclaz, M. Geoffroy, E. Levillain,
N. Avarvari, M. Fourmigue´, F. X. Sauvage and C. Wartelle, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 2005, 7, 85.
∑
already observed for example in oxidized [(P2)M(CO)4]+ (M =
Mo, W) complexes.8
We are therefore in the presence of a rare example of a TTF
metal complex where both redox active moieties oxidise almost
simultaneously and independently, a behaviour which is also
related to non-symmetrical mixed-valence systems.12,20 Isolation
of the cationic and dicationic species is certainly now needed to
gain a deeper understanding of this versatile system. Indeed, the
dmit ligand can also be easily replaced by other dithiolene ligands
of different electron donating ability, allowing for a fine tuning of
the relative weight of the TTF and Pt(dithiolene) moieties in the
oxidation process.
9 M. Fourmigue´, C. E. Uzelmeier, K. Boubekeur, S. L. Bartley and K. R.
Dunbar, J. Organomet. Chem., 1997, 529, 343.
10 B. W. Smucker and K. R. Dunbar, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000,
1309.
11 C. E. Uzelmeier, B. W. Smucker, E. W. Reinheimer, A. W. O’Neal, M.
Fourmigue´ and K. R. Dunbar, Dalton Trans., 2006, 5259.
12 E. Isomura, K. Tokuyama, T. Nishinaga and M. Iyoda, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2007, 48, 5895.
13 K. D. Demadis, C. M. Hartshorn and T. J. Meyer, Chem. Rev., 2001,
101, 2655.
14 M. Iyoda, M. Hasegawa and Y. Miyake, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 5085;
F. Biaso, M. Geoffroy, E. Canadell, P. Auban-Senzier, E. Levillain, M.
Fourmigue´ and N. Avarvari, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 5394.
15 D. Y. Noh, E. M. Seo, H. J. Lee, H. Y. Jang, M. G. Choi, H. Y. Kim and
J. Hong, Polyhedron, 2001, 20, 1939; K. S. Shin, Y. K. Han and D. Y.
Noh, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2003, 24, 235.
16 S. P. Kaiwar, J. K. Hsu, L. M. Liable-Sands, A. L. Rheingold and R. S.
Pilato, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 4234; J. M. Bevilacqua, J. A. Zuleta and
R. Eisenberg, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 258; N. Lardies, E. Cerrada and
M. Laguna, Polyhedron, 2006, 25, 2785.
This work was initiated and supported by the Korean-French
Science and Technology Amicable Research Program (STAR)
2006–07 (no. 12974RC) and 2008–09 (no. 19036SM). D.-Y. N.
acknowledges financial supports from Korea Science and Engi-
neering Foundation (KOSEF R01-2003-000-10470-0) and Korea
Research Foundation (KRF-2003-070-C00029). We thank the
CINES (Montpellier) for computing time.
17 R. Vicente, J. Ribas, X. Solans, M. Font-Altaba, A. Mari, P. De Loth
and P. Cassoux, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1987, 132, 229.
Notes and references
‡ Experimental data: Synthesis of (P2)PtCl2. A chloroform solution
(20 mL) of PtCl2(CH3CN)2 (0.72 mmol, 250 mg) and P24 (0.72 mmol,
432 mg) was refluxed overnight with stirring. The red solution was cooled
to room temperature, evaporated under reduced pressure and washed with
18 S. M. S. V. Doidge-Harrison, J. T. S. Irvine, A. Khan, G. M. Spencer,
J. L. Wardell and J. H. Aupers, J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 516, 199;
M. Nomura and M. Fourmigue´, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 47, 1301.
19 V. Khodorkovsky, L. Shapiro, P. Krief, A. Shames, G. Mabon, A.
Gorgues and M. Giffard, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2736; S. V. Rosokha
and J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 828.
20 N. Dowling, P. M. Henry, N. A. Lewis and H. Taube, Inorg. Chem.,
1981, 20, 2345; Z. Li, A. M. Beatty and T. P. Fehlner, Inorg. Chem.,
2003, 42, 5707; M. C. B. Colbert, S. L. Ingham, J. Lewis, N. J. Long and
P. R. Raithby, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 2215; D. Touchard,
P. Haquette, N. Pirio, L. Toupet and P. H. Dixneuf, Organometallics,
1993, 12, 3132.
diethyl ether. Yield 97% (603 mg). MALDI-TOF (m/z): 866.1093 (M+
+
1), 831.1475 (M+ - Cl + 1). FT-IR (KBr, cm-1) 3054 (Ar C–H), 2916,
=
2835 (–CH3), 1629 (C C), 1481, 1436 (Ar ip str), 1101 (P–Ph str), 743
(oop CH def), 690, 561, 524, 485 (oop ring def). UV-Vis (CH3CN, nm,
emax ¥ 104 M-1 cm-1) 196 (2.22), 234 (0.72), 270 (sh, 0.34), 280 (sh, 0.30),
316 (0.29), 452 (0.01). 1H NMR (CDCl3, d ppm) 7.85 (8H, m) 7.57 (12H,
1
m) 1.90 (6H s). 31P{ H} NMR (CDCl3, H3PO4, d ppm) -27.22 (1JPt–P
=
3640 Hz).
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Dalton Trans., 2008, 5869–5871 | 5871
©