H.-S. Chong et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5792–5795
5795
Based on the promising data obtained from the AAIII based
Acknowledgments
spectroscopic complexation kinetics and serum stability experi-
ments, the stability of 205/6Bi–DEPA was further evaluated by per-
This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health
(R01CA112503-01A2 to C.H.S.). This material is in part based upon
work supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH,
National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research (M.W.B.)
and by the Office of Research and Development (Medical Research
Service), Department of Veterans Affairs, through a Merit Review
Type I Award (M.R.L.).
forming
a biodistribution study in normal athymic mice as
described previously.8 Blood levels and organ uptake of the radio-
labeled complexes in mice were measured at five time points, 0.5,
1, 4, 8, and 24 h post-injection of 205/6Bi–DEPA. The data in Figure 4
illustrate that DEPA radiolabeled with 205/6Bi was essentially inert
in vivo and rapidly cleared from the body. Radioactivity that was
detected in the blood and the organs was less than 2.44 %ID/g at
all points. At 24 h post-injection, the %ID/g in the kidneys and
spleen was 0.36 0.03% and 0.39 0.07%, respectively, which was
slightly higher than that observed in other organs. The bone accu-
mulation of the radioactivity was 2.02 0.96 %ID/g at 0.5 h which
rapidly decreased to 0.38 0.09 %ID/g at 1 h. Previously, we re-
ported that 177Lu–NETA displayed very low organ uptake and rapid
blood clearance, while 205/6Bi–NETA exhibited very high retention
in liver at the longer time intervals (5.93 0.78 %ID/g at 0.5 h
and 7.31 1.521 %ID/g at 24 h) due to possible dissociation of the
complex in vivo. Although NETA formed a stable complex with
Lu(III) (89 pm), the ligand seems to be inadequate for larger metal
Bi(III) (117 pm) due to its smaller cavity size compared to the mac-
rocyclic ring in DEPA. The in vivo biodistribution result suggest
that the enhanced in vivo stability of 205/6Bi–DEPA compared to
205/6Bi–NETA may result from size-match between Bi(III) and mac-
rocyclic DOTA backbone.19
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Caravan, P.; Ellison, J. J.; McMurry, T. J.; Lauffer, R. B. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99,
2293.
2. Wadas, T. J.; Wong, E. H.; Weisman, G. R.; Anderson, C. J. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007,
13, 3.
3. Birch, N.; Wang, X.; Chong, H. S. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2006, 16, 1533.
4. Milenic, D. E.; Brady, E. D.; Brechbiel, M. W. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3,
488.
5. Chong, H. S.; Garmestani, K.; Millenic, D. E.; Brechbiel, M. W. J. Med. Chem. 2002,
45, 3458.
6. Chong, H. S.; Milenic, D. E.; Garmestani, K.; Brady, E. D.; Arora, H.; Pfiester, C.;
Brechbiel, M. W. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006, 33, 459.
In summary, the novel decadentate ligand DEPA having both
macrocyclic and acyclic metal binding moieties was efficiently
prepared. The complexation stability and kinetics data suggest
that DEPA displayed more rapid and substantial complexation
with Bi(III) as compared to DOTA, but appears to be slow in bind-
ing Lu(III). 177Lu–DEPA was found to be stable in serum, while
considerable amount of 177Lu (10%) was released from 177Lu–
DOTA over 4 days. DEPA radiolabeled with 205/6Bi was very stable
in human serum for 2 weeks and displayed excellent in vivo
stability. The complexation kinetics, serum stability, and in vivo
biodistribution data confirm the potential of DEPA as a viable
chelator of 212Bi and 213Bi and validate the synthesis of a bifunc-
tional derivative for RIT.
7. Chong, H. S.; Mhaske, S.; Lin, M.; Bhuniya, S.; Song, H. A.; Brechbiel, M. W.; Sun,
X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6107.
8. Chong, H. S.; Garmestani, K.; Bryant, L. H., Jr.; Milenic, D. E.; Overstreet, T.;
Birch, N.; Le, T.; Brady, E. D.; Brechbiel, M. W. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2055.
9. Hassfjell, S.; Brechbiel, M. W. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2019.
10. Srivastava, S.; Dadachova, E. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2001, 31, 330.
12. Huskens, J.; Sherry, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4396.
13. Li, C.; Wong, W.-K. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5595.
14. Williams, M. A.; Rapport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1151.
15. Savvin, S. B. Talanta 1961, 673.
16. Kodama, M.; Koike, T.; Mahatma, A. B.; Kimura, E. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 1270.
17. Li, W. P.; Smith, C. J.; Cutler, C. S.; Hoffman, T. J.; Ketring, A. R.; Jurisson, S. S.
Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30, 241.
18. Garmestani, K.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wong, K.; Park, C. W.; Pastan, I.;
Carrasquillo, J. A.; Brechbiel, M. W. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2001, 28, 409.
19. Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751.