Table 1 Thermal behaviour of the new complexes
comparison, it was felt that the data were acceptable and fit for
purpose. Thus, the higher homologues, namely 4-10 and 4-12,
showed enantiotropic SmA phases. Complex 4-10 melted at 85.2
and cleared at 98.1 1C, while 4-10 melted at 87.1 and cleared at
102.1 1C.
Complex
Transition
T/1C
DH/kJ molꢂ1
2-4
Cr–I
116.5
(107.4)
88.4
107.4
85.6
101.7
89.8
100.0
97.8
60.4
(2.8)
57.6
2.1
88.8
2.5
(N–I)a
Cr–N
N–I
2-6
It is interesting to compare these temperatures with those of
complex 3 and also complexes 1-n.9 Thus, 3 also shows a SmA
phase but in this case, the crystal phase is more stable and so it
appears monotropically with TSmA–I at 94 1C. Similarly, 1-12 also
showed a SmA phase, this time enantiotropic melting at 81 and
clearing at 84 1C. Thus, the transition temperatures are lower
where stilbazole is bound to C6F5I when compared to C6F5OH,
and lower where the stilbazole is bound to C6F5OH rather than
p-IC6F4OH. On one hand, this would suggest that the more
electrostatic nature of the hydrogen bond contributes favourably
to phase stabilisation, and on the other it suggests that p-C6F4–I is
a more effective terminal group than p-C6F4–F for phase stabilisa-
tion, presumably due to the great polarisability anisotropy.
We thank EPSRC for support (CP and HLN).
2-8
Cr–N
N–I
Cr–N
N–I
Cr–SmA
SmA–N
N–I
2-10
2-12b
62.0
1.9
—
100.2
102.0
96.0
86.9c
5.4
3d
Cr–I
49
(SmA–I)
Cr–I
Cr–I
(94.0)
105.8
103.6
107.0
(92.4)
85.2
98.1
87.1
102.1
(2.0)
29.9
34.0
56.5
(1.8)
28.1
1.5
4-4b
4-6b
4-8
Cr–I
(N–I)
Cr–SmA
SmA–I
Cr–SmA
SmA–I
4-10b
4-12b
39.9
3.9
a
b
Monotropic transitions in parentheses. Prepared by evaporation of
c
1 : 1 solution in thf. Combined enthalpy for Cr–SmA–N; not
d
resolved by DSC. Data from ref. 5.
Notes and references
1 D. W. Bruce, Struct. Bonding, 2008, 126, 161.
2 C. Dai, P. Nguyen, T. B. Marder, A. J. Scott, W. Clegg and
C. Viney, Chem. Commun., 1999, 2493; N. Boden, R. J. Bushby,
Z. Lu and O. R. Lozman, Liq. Cryst., 2001, 5, 657; N. Boden,
R. J. Bushby, Z. Lu and O. R. Lozman, J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11,
1612; N. Boden, R. J. Bushby, G. Cooke, O. R. Lozman and Z. Lu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7915.
3 K. Praefcke and J. D. Holbrey, J. Inclusion Phenom. Mol. Recog-
nit. Chem., 1996, 24, 19; T. Hegmann, J. Kain, S. Diele, G. Pelzl
and C. Tschierske, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 887.
4 For reviews see e.g. T. Kato, in Handbook of Liquid Crystals, ed.
D. Demus, G. W. Gray, J. Goodby, H.-W. Spiess and V. Vill,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998; D. Tsiourvas and C. Paleos, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1696.
slightly more linear halogen and hydrogen bonds, able to form
when the constraints of crystal packing are lifted.
In previous studies of trimeric, halogen-bonded liquid crystals
containing two stilbazole molecules,11,13 we had postulated the
dissociation of one of these at the clearing point, evidenced by the
rather large enthalpy changes observed (typically 8 to 9 kJ molꢂ1).
The clearing enthalpies for 2-n are much smaller at between 2 and
3 kJ molꢂ1, which we take as evidence that clearing is not
accompanied by dissociation. Certainly studies carried out on
purely hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals showed conclusively that
clearing was neither driven nor accompanied by rupture of the
hydrogen bond18 and so in the present materials where there is
only one halogen bond, the clearing transition appears to be that
of the intact complex.
5 D. W. Bruce, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 2001, 52, 151.
6 See e.g. (a) K. Willis, D. J. Price, H. Adams, G. Ungar and
D. W. Bruce, J. Mater. Chem., 1995, 5, 2195; (b) D. J. Price,
K. Willis, T. Richardson, G. Ungar and D. W. Bruce, J. Mater.
Chem., 1997, 7, 883; (c) D. W. Bruce and D. J. Price, Adv. Mater.
Opt. Electron., 1994, 4, 273.
1 : 1 Complexes (4-n) between the stilbazoles and 4-iodotetra-
fluorophenol were also obtained for comparison. Preparation of
these complexes was not so straightforward and only for 4-8 was a
crystalline complex obtained from thf. We believe that this
complex had thf halogen bonded to the free iodine, but this thf
is readily removed in vacuo and does not influence the meso-
morphism. Indeed, 4-8 was the first homologue to show any
mesomorphism and, following melting to the isotropic phase at
107.0 1C, a monotropic nematic phase was found at 92.4 1C.
Because of the difficulty associated with preparing crystalline
derivatives, other homologues were obtained by dissolving the
components together in thf, evaporating the solvent slowly and
then finally pumping to ensure complete removal. While we have
found this method to be very good where hydrogen-bonded
materials are concerned, in general it has proved less satisfactory
where halogen-bonded materials are concerned. Nonetheless, we
re-prepared 4-8 by this method and found Cr–I at 105.8 1C and
(I–N) at 90.2 1C. The lower temperatures and slightly broader
transitions are indicative of a material that is not perfectly pure,
which in this case means that it is not single phase. Nonetheless,
the temperatures are rather close and so for the purposes of
7 O. Hassel and C. Rømming, Q. Rev. Chem. Soc., 1962, 16, 1;
A. C. Legon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2687; A. C. Legon,
Chem.–Eur. J., 1998, 4, 1980.
8 P. Metrangolo, H. Neukirch, T. Pilati and G. Resnati, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2005, 38, 386; Halogen Bonding: Fundamentals and Applica-
tions, Struct. Bonding, ed. P. Metrangolo and G. Resnati, 2008, 126.
9 H. L. Nguyen, P. N. Horton, M. B. Hursthouse, A. C. Legon and
D. W. Bruce, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 16.
10 P. Metrangolo, C. Prasang, G. Resnati, R. Liantonio,
A. C. Whitwood and D. W. Bruce, Chem. Commun., 2006, 3290.
11 D. W. Bruce, F. Chaux, P. Metrangolo, F. Meyer, C. Prasang,
G. Resnati and A. C. Whitwood, New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 477.
12 J. Xu, X. Xueming, T. Lin, J. Huang and C. He, Macromolecules,
2005, 38, 3554; J. Xu, X. Liu, J. K.-P. Ng, T. Lin and C. He,
J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 3540.
13 C. Prasang, A. C. Whitwood and D. W. Bruce, Chem. Commun.,
2008, 2137.
14 C. B. Aakeroy, J. Desper, B. A. Helfrich, P. Metrangolo, T. Pilati,
G. Resnati and A. Stevenazzi, Chem. Commun., 2007, 4236.
15 J. Wen, H. Yu and Q. Chen, J. Mater. Chem., 1994, 4, 1715.
16 T. Clark, M. Hennemann, J. S. Murray and P. Politzer, J. Mol.
Model., 2007, 13, 291.
17 E. Corradi, S. V. Meille, M. T. Messina, P. Metrangolo and
G. Resnati, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 1782.
18 D. J. Price, T. Richardson and D. W. Bruce, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1995, 1911.
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
6166 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 6164–6166