good enantioselectivities in the literature (ref 4e, f), our
substrate failed (Scheme 1), however, with a diastereomeric
mixture of compound 5 being obtained. We reckoned that
the steric hindrance as well as chelation effects enhanced
by the oxazolidine moiety might be the cause of low
stereoselectivity.
Scheme 1
.
Initial Attempts toward Enantioselective Sequential
Michael Addition-Alkylation
Having failed to effect the desired conversion, alternative
way was thus sought. Carefully analysis of the model of
natural pseudoephedrine derived oxazolidine; it was postu-
lated that a chelated chiral aryllithium reagent would favor
the formation of diastereoisomer with desired stereochemistry
(Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. New Retrosynthetic Analysis of Podophyllotoxin
alkylation process and a concise (eight steps) total synthesis
of (+)-podophyllotoxin.
Figure 1. Natural podophyllotoxin and podophyllotoxone.
Based on model analysis, unnatural (+)-pseudoephe-
drine might provided the desired absolute configuration
for the synthesis of natural podophyllotoxin. Because we
were only able to access natural (+)-pseudoephedrine, we
decided to use (+)-pseudoephedrine to confirm the model
postulate. 6-Bromopiperonal was therefore treated with
(+)-pseudoephedrine and directly converted to oxazolidine
8 as a single diastereomer (Scheme 3).6
Our initial plan to address the key Michael addition-
alkylation was to utilize protocols developed by Alexakis4e
and Frey4f (in both cases, enantiopure pseudoephedrine was
used in Michael acceptor both as a protecting group and a
chiral auxiliary on the aldehyde motif of cinnamic deriva-
tives, only Michael addition, without the subsequent alky-
lation, being reported).4
When oxazolidine-derived aryllithium was used as
reagent, conjugate addition-alkylation occurred as ex-
pected, and after deprotection with aqueous acetic acid, a
diastereomeric mixture (syn/anti ) 1/11) was obtained in
64% yield with an enantiomeric excess of 84.8% being
observed (Chiral HPLC analysis on AD-H column). In
order to optimize the stereoselectivity, we decided to add
N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA), a fre-
quently used solvating agent in organolithium chemistry7
with observed beneficial effects on stereoselectivity.7a To
our delight, addition of TMEDA not only provided
excellent diastereoselectivity (with no syn-diastereoisomer
being detected by NMR, dr ) 96.8% by Chiral HPLC,
Since natural (S,S)-(+)-pseudoephedrine was the only
available material in hand,5 it was then employed to prepare
oxazolidine 4. Although substrates similar to 4 resulted in
(4) For recent application of ephedrine derivatives in Michael addition,
see:(a) Kummer, D. A.; Chain, W. J.; Morales, M. R.; Quiroga, O.; Myers,
A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13231. (b) Reyes, E.; Vicario, J. L.;
Carrillo, L.; Badia, D.; Uria, U.; Iza, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7763. (c)
Reyes, E.; Vicario, J. L.; Carrillo, L.; Badia, D.; Iza, A.; Uria, U. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 2535. (d) Smitrovich, J. H.; DiMichele, L.; Qu, C.; Boice,
G. N.; Nelson, T. D.; Huffman, M. A.; Murry, J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
1903. (e) Alexakis, A.; Sedrani, R.; Mangeney, P.; Normant, J. F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4411. (f) Frey, L. F.; Tillyer, R. D.; Caille,
A.-S.; Tschaen, D. M.; Dolling, U.-H.; Grabowski, E. J. J.; Reider, P. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3120.
(5) Due to the regulation governing the sale and production of ephedrine
and pseudoephedrine in China, we are only able to access natural (+)-
ephedrine and natural (+)-pseudoephedrine; we are unable to get unnatural
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, although those two isomers are listed in
the Aldrich catalogue.
(6) Neelakantan, L. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 2256.
(7) (a) Agami, C.; Comesse, S.; Kadouri-Puchot, C. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 1496. (b) Collum, D. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 448.
598
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009