A. Scrivanti et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 694 (2009) 131–136
135
even at room temperature and in the early stages consists of a
‘‘clean” deligation of the olefin from the metal centre which can
be monitored recording the growth of the singlet due to uncoordi-
nated fumaronitrile at d 6.35 in the 1H NMR spectrum. Experiments
aimed to highlight the fate of the metal fragment were unsuccess-
ful and in particular it should be mentioned that no evidence sup-
porting the formation of palladium-hydride species [21,28] was
found. On standing the solutions of 4a darken, thus, it is likely that
at the end the decomposition leads to colloidal palladium.
(d, C-6Py, JPC = 11.8 Hz), 136.8 (d, C-1Ph, JPC = 10.7 Hz), 135.9 (d,
C-4Py, JPC = 3.0 Hz), 134.5 (d, C-2Ph, JPC = 20.0 Hz), 129.3 (s, C-
4Ph), 128.8 (d, C-3Ph, JPC = 7.1 Hz), 128.2 (d, C-3Py, JPC = 18.6 Hz),
122.5 (s, C-5Py).
4.2. [Ph2PPyH](CH3SO3)
To a solution of 2-pyridyldiphenylphosphine in dichlorometh-
ane (150 mg, 0.57 mmol in 20 mL) were added 37 lL (55 mg,
The poor stability of 4a is likely to be attributed to the reduced
0.57 mmol) of CH3SO3H under stirring. Addition of diethylether af-
fords the pyridinium salt as a white microcrystalline powder
(194 mg, 95% yield). Anal. Calc. for C18H18NO3PS: C, 60.16; H,
5.05. Found: C, 60.2; H, 5.1%.
r
-donor ability of Ph2PPyH+ and its improved
P-acceptor
character: since
P-back-donation from the metal is a key factor
in determining the stability of the fumaronitrile–palladium bond
[17,19,29], it is conceivable that ligand protonation leads to a
significant decrease of the electron density at the metal centre so
that the back-donation from the metal to the olefin decreases
and the palladium–fumaronitrile interaction is substantially
weakened.
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d 2.50 (s, 3H, CH3SO3), 7.3–7.6 (m,
11H, phenyl and H-3Py), 7.82 (m, 1H, H-5Py), 8.22 (m, 1H, H-
4Py), 9.18 (d, 1H, H-6Py, JH-5Py–H-6Py = 5.9 Hz), 14.0 (very br s,
1H, NH). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 195 K): d 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3SO3), 7.27
(m, 1H, H-3Py), 7.3–7.6 (m, 10H, phenyl), 7.82 (m, 1H, H-5Py),
8.22 (m, 1H, H-4Py), 9.11 (apparent t, 1H, H-6Py, JH-5Py–H-6Py
ꢁ
3. Conclusions
JNH–H-6Py ꢁ 5 Hz), 17.05 (br d, 1H, NH, JNH–H-6Py ꢁ 5 Hz). 31P {1H}
NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d ꢀ6.5 (s). 13C {1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K):
d 160.1 (d, C-2Py, JPC = 31.6 Hz), 145.0 (d, C-6Py, JPC = 3.6 Hz),
144.5 (s, C-4Py), 134.7 (d, C-2Ph, JPC = 21.4 Hz), 131.4 (d, C-1Ph,
This study shows that the palladium allyl moiety is quite robust
and able to withstand the treatment with strong protic acids such
as the methanesulfonic acid. Thus, complexes 1 and 3 containing
the P monodentate 2-pyridyldiphenylphosphine are smoothly pro-
tonated at the pendant nitrogen atom forming the corresponding
species containing the 2-(diphenylphosphino)pyridinium ion act-
ing as a P monodentate ligand; these complexes appear stable even
under ordinary atmosphere at room temperature. The effects
brought about by the protonation on the 1H and 13C NMR
resonances of the allyl moieties of both 1 and 3 indicate that the
JPC = 8.8 Hz), 131.0 (s, C-4Ph), 130.9 (d, C-3Py, JPC
129.7 (d, C-3Ph, JPC= 8.2 Hz), 125.9 (s, C-5Py), 39.3 (s, CH3SO3).
= 3.0 Hz),
4.3. [Pd(
g
3-2-CH3-C3H4)Cl(Ph2PPyH)](CH3SO3) (1a)
2.0
lL of CH3SO3H (2.9 mg, 0.03 mmol) were added to a CD2Cl2
solution of 1 (13.7 mg, 0.03 mmol) in CD2Cl2 (1 mL).
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 253 K): d 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.51 (s, 3H,
CH3SO3), 3.08 (s, Hb anti), 3.43 (br s, Ha syn), 3.70 (d, Hd anti,
JHP = 10.2 Hz), 4.63 (m, Hc syn, JHP = 6.5 Hz), 7.5–7.7 (m, 11H, phe-
protonated phosphine is a poor
r-donor and an enhanced P-
acceptor. The scarce donor ability of the 2-(diphenylphos-
phino)pyridinium ligand is confirmed by the thermal unstability
of complex 4a. Finally, it should be remarked that the deligation
of fumaronitrile from the metal centre suggests a rationale for
the complete chemoselectivity observed in the catalytic alkyne
carbonylation: a second carbonylation does not occur probably be-
cause the formed acrylic acid derivative is unable to coordinate to
palladium.
nyl and H-3Py), 7.96 (m, 1H, H-5Py), 8.32 (m, 1H, H-4Py), 9.24
31
(m, H-6Py, JH-5Py–H-6Py = 3.3 Hz), 11.9 (br s, 1H, NH).
P{1H} NMR
(CD2Cl2, 253 K): d 26.8 (s). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 298 K): d 153.4 (d, C-
2Py, JCP = 33.5 Hz), 146.0 (d, C-6Py, JCP = 6.5 Hz), 143.4 (d, C-4Py,
JCP = 4.2 Hz), 134.6 (br d, C-2all, JCP = 3.0 Hz), 134.2 (d, C-2Ph,
JCP = 14.3 Hz), 131.9 (d, C-4Ph, JCP = 1.6 Hz), 131.4 (d, C-3Py,
JCP = 10.4 Hz), 129.4 (d, C-3Ph, JCP = 10.4 Hz), 128.0 (d, C-1Ph,
JCP = 41.7 Hz), 127.0 (s, C-5Py), 79.6 (br s, C-3all), 62.3 (br s, C-
1all), 39.1 (s, CH3SO3), 23.2 (s, C-4all).
4. Experimental
4.4. [Pd(
g
3-2-CH3-C3H4)(PPh2PyH)2](BF4)(CH3SO3)2 (3a)
1H, 13C{1H} and 31P{1H} NMR spectra were registered on a Bru-
ker Avance 300 spectrometer operating at 300.213, 75.44, and
100.015 MHz, respectively. 1H and 13C chemical shifts are re-
ported relative to TMS using solvent resonances as a secondary
reference. 31P chemical shifts are reported relative to external
85% H3PO4. All manipulations were performed under argon
atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques. Solvents (Al-
drich) were purified according to standard literature methods
[30].
4.0
l
L of CH3SO3H (5.8 mg, 0.06 mmol) were added to a CD2Cl2
solution of 3 (23.3 mg, 0.03 mmol) in CD2Cl2 (1 mL).
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d 1.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.73 (6H, CH3SO3),
3.90 (m, 2H, Hb and Hd anti), 3.93 (br s, 2H, Ha and Hc syn), 7.3–7.7
(m, 26H, arom), 8.17 (t, 2H, H-4Py, JH-4Py–H-5Py ꢁ JH-4Py–H-
3Py = 7.7 Hz), 8.32 (d, 2H, H-6Py, JH-5Py–H-6Py = 4.4 Hz), 13.2 (br s,
2H, N-H). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d 26.6 (s). 13C{1H} NMR
(CD2Cl2, 298 K): d 152.3 (AA0X0 m, 2C, C-2Py), 147.4 (AA0X m, 2C,
C-6Py), 142.6 (s, 2C, C-4Py), 140.0 (t, 1C, C-2all, JCP = 5.0 Hz),
134.4 (AA0X m, 8C, C-2Ph), 132.7 (s, 4C, C-4Ph), 129.9–129.7 (m,
10C, C-3Ph and C-3Py), 127.6 (AA0X m, 2C, C-1Ph), 127.1 (s, 2C,
C-5Py), 80.6 (AA0X m, 2C, C-1all and C-3all), 39.5 (s, 2C, CH3SO3),
23.2 (s, 1C, C-4all).
Fumaronitrile and methanesulfonic acid were high purity com-
mercial products (Aldrich) and were used as received. Commercial
Ph2PPy (Aldrich) was recrystallized from methanol. [Pd(
C3H4)Cl]2 [31], [PdCl(
3-2-CH3-C3H4)(Ph2PPy)] [9,14], [Pd2(
CH3-C3H4)2( -Ph2PPy)2](BF4)2 [15] and [Pd(
3-2-CH3-C3H4)
g
3-2-CH3-
3-2-
g
g
l
g
(Ph2PPy)2](BF4) [15] were prepared according to literature
methods.
4.5. [Pd(g
2-fumaronitrile)(PPh2Py)2] (4)
4.1. Ph2PPy
To a solution of 3 (332 mg, 0.43 mmol) in dichloromethane
(20 mL) were added first 39 mg (0.50 mmol) of fumaronitrile then
135 lL (95 mg, 1.25 mmol) of diethylamine dissolved in 10 mL of
dichloromethane. After stirring for 1 h the solution was extracted
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d 7.15 (m, 1H, H-3Py), 7.22 (m, 1H, H-
5Py), 7.3–7.4 (m, 10H, phenyl), 7.60 (H-4Py), 8.71 (d, 1H, H-6Py, JH-
5Py–H-6Py = 5.0 Hz). 31P {1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d ꢀ3.5 (s). 13C
{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 298 K): d 164.0 (d, C-2Py, JPC = 3.8 Hz), 150.5
with water (2 ꢅ 20 mL), dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The clear