Conformations of Cyclic Triazepinone/Open Hydrazones
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 15, 1997 5087
Sch em e 3
causes an increase in the R3 population at the expense
of R1; and for the counterparts 9/10 an increase in the
O2 population at the expense of O1.
Although conjugation clearly exerts some effect on the
barriers to rotation in 7-20 (Scheme 3), the complexity
of the observed ring/open-chain rearrangement processes
makes a quantitative study in terms of a simple linear
correlation: log Kx ) Fσ+ + c, where Kx ) [ring]/[chain],
found valid in our previous comparative studies of
2-aryltetrahydro-1,3-oxazines18 and 1,3-oxazolidines,19
impossible.
for 7. Such an effect may be attributed only to the
differences in their electronic properties, i.e. to resonance
effects and electrostatic interactions obeying the classical
picture of the forces that control conformational prefer-
ence.17
Exp er im en ta l Section
NMR Sp ectr a . The 1D and 2D NMR spectra were mea-
sured on a J EOL J NM GX-400 spectrometer operating at
399.78 MHz for H and 100.53 MHz for 13C, respectively, using
1
1
The H and 13C NMR spectral assignments and hence
a 5 mm 1H/13C dual probe head (90° 1H rf pulse width, 16 ms;
90° 13C rf pulse width, 8 ms; 90° decoupler rf pulse width 40
ms). All chemical shifts were referenced to the solvent [δ )
7.24 and 77.1 ppm (CDCl3), δ ) 2.49 and 39.5 ppm (DMSO-
d6), and δ ) 5.32 and 53.8 ppm (CD2Cl2) for 1H and 13C,
respectively]. The digital resolution of the 1D NMR spectra
the structure determination of 8-20 were achieved on
the basis of those of 7, as well as from the time (a few
weeks)-dependent changes in their spectra at room
temperature, assisted by 2D NMR experiments (e.g. 19).
As for 7, the initial state of the complex equilibrium
favors the ring boat (R1 and R2) form(s) in rapid
exchange and the trans-E open-chain isomer, but the
relative amounts of these forms vary essentially with the
substitution in 8-20. The dynamic processes observed
were an interconversion (i) of the open-chain trans-E (O1)
to the cis-E (O2), trans-Z (O3), and boat forms, and (ii)
of the latter to the N-3-inverted (B)′ form [i.e. (R3)] form,
giving a new O1/R1 ratio in the equilibrium state. A
temporary increase in the amount of the O2 isomer, as
for 7, was observed in most cases. Moreover, the rate of
interconversion in the above processes obviously in-
creases when going from 9 to 20. Compounds 9-16,
bearing electron-withdrawing groups (EWG), display a
higher rate of interconversion and a greater amount of
O2 and a lower amount of O3 forms at equilibrium state,
i.e. an easier amide-bond and a more difficult CdN
rotation than in 7 and 17-20. Thus, the electronic
factors controlling the conformational behavior of the
open-chain forms of 7 were strengthened in the case of
8-20. In comparison with 1-6, phenyl and/or EWG
groups at the azomethine carbon in our hydrazones lead
to a barrier-lowering effect for the cis-trans amide bond
rotation, and to a barrier-raising effect for the Z/ E-
transformation process, and both observations can be
explained in terms of electronic effects (Scheme 3).
As to the ring forms, an initial preference of R1 over
O1 (ratio ca. 2:1) and the absence of the R3 conformer
were noted for 9-16. Only for 9 and 10 two different
ring forms with δ(C-2)-methyl protons at 1.68 and 1.57
ppm were observed, just after dissolution, and were
assigned to the boat and inverted boat forms. Hence, the
barrier-raising effect of the p-NO2 group was observed
for the ring-flipping process in 9 and 10, in comparison
with 7 and 11-20. In general, a reduction in the
electron-withdrawing power and an increase in the
electron-releasing power of the substituents when going
from 9 to 20 favor the (N-3)-inverted boat (R3) form, the
amount of which increases, whereas that of R1 drastically
decreases. An essential difference in the populations of
the ring and open forms was also observed when the
effect of the chlorine substituent on the benzo part of the
benzodiazepine ring was considered. Thus, for the
counterparts 11/12 and 13/14, the chlorine substituent
1
was 0.2 and 0.7 Hz per point for H and 13C, respectively. J EOL
automatic microprograms were applied to obtain DEPT, 1H
NOE difference spectra, 2D HETCORR, and 2D LR HETCORR
1
NMR spectra. The H NOE difference spectra were acquired
with a pulse width of 8 ms, a duration of irradiation of 1000
ms, and a delay of relaxation of 8 s. The 2D experiments
normally involved a 128 × 2 K data matrix with NS ) 640
and NE ) 64. In 2D HETCORR and 2D LR HETCORR
experiments, delays of 3.33 and 2.22 ms, and 40 and 20 ms
were used to optimize the sensitivity for the response of the
1
direct and long-range H/13C coupling constants, respectively.
After zero filling in F1, a sine-bell nonshifted weighting was
used in both dimensions. The spectrometer was fitted with a
variable-temperature accessory capable of maintaining tem-
perature to within (2 K.
Syn th eses. The crystalline 1-(2′-aminobenzoyl)-1-methyl-
hydrazines and the 5′-chloro derivative were prepared accord-
ing to a literature20 method, starting from the corresponding
isatoic anhydrides with methylhydrazines. The aldehydes and
ketones used were commercial products. Melting points were
determined on an Electrothermal digital melting point ap-
paratus and are uncorrected.
A. Rea ction s of 1-(2′-Am in oben zoyl)-1-m eth ylh yd r a -
zin es w ith Alip h a tic Keton es. A mixture of 1-(2′-ami-
nobenzoyl)-1-methylhydrazine or 1-(2′-amino-5′-chlorobenzoyl)-
1-methylhydrazine (2 mmol) and 5 mL of a ketone (acetone,
3-methyl-2-butanone and 3,3-dimethyl-2-butanone were used)
was refluxed for 4-20 h. The reaction was monitored by
means of TLC. After evaporation of the solvent, products 1-5
crystallized out on ethereal treatment. The yields were 56-
67%.
B. Rea ction of 1-(2′-Am in oben zoyl)-1-m eth ylh yd r a -
zin es w ith Cycloh exa n on e. 1-(2′-Aminobenzoyl)-1-methyl-
hydrazine (1 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL of 50% ethanol, and
0.5 g of cyclohexanone was added. The product started to
crystallize out after a few min. After standing overnight, 6
was filtered off and recrystallized from 50% EtOH in 84% yield.
C. Rea ction s of 1-(2′-Am in oben zoyl)-1-m eth ylh yd r a -
zin es w ith Acetop h en on es. A mixture of 1-(2′-aminoben-
zoyl)-1-methylhydrazine or 1-(2′-amino-5′-chlorobenzoyl)-1-
methylhydrazine (2 mmol), an acetophenone derivative (2
mmol), and p-toluenesulfonic acid (10 mg) was refluxed in
benzene (15 mL) for 5-8 h. The solvent was evaporated off,
and products 7-20 crystallized out after ethereal treatment
and were recrystallized. The yields were 70-90%.
(18) Fu¨lo¨p, F.; Pihlaja, K.; Mattinen, J .; Berna´th, G. J . Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 3821.
(19) (a) Fu¨lo¨p, F.; Berna´th, G.; Mattinen, J .; Pihlaja, K. Tetrahedron
1989, 45, 4317. (b) Fu¨lo¨p, F.; Pihlaja, K.; Neuvonen, K.; Berna´th, G.;
Argay, Gy.; Ka´lma´n, A. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1967.
(20) Fu¨lo¨p, F.; Pihlaja, K. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1991, 23, 377.
(17) Riddell, F. G. The Conformational Analysis of Heterocyclic
Compounds; Academic Press: 1980; p 7.