N. Hayashi, M. Nakada / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 232–235
235
In the case of the enol phosphate 13 (Table 1, entry 5), the reac-
tion was completed by use of a catalytic amount of Fe(acac)3
(0.6 equiv), although the amount was relatively large. On the other
hand, the reaction of the enol phosphate 17 required a large excess
of the reagents. This can be attributed to the steric hindrance de-
rived from the two adjacent substituents (a tert-butyldiphenyl-
silyloxymethyl group and a methyl group), which were placed at
both sides of the enol phosphate substituent. That is, the steric hin-
drance retarded the coupling reaction, and therefore large amounts
of the reagents were required. Furthermore, the reactive species
generated in the reaction mixture to provide product 18 were
not clear, although it could be possible to exclude the ironate com-
plex since Me3FeLi provided no coupling products in the reaction
with the enol phosphate 13 (Table 1, entries 3 and 4).
After we had established the synthetic route to compound 18,
we examined its transformation into MK8383 (Scheme 6). The es-
ter 18 was reduced by DIBAL to provide the allylic alcohol (97%),
which was subjected to bromination. Although a mixture of the
geometrical isomers was formed by the use of PPh3 and CBr4, no
isomerization was observed when PBr3 was used. The allylic bro-
mide 19 thus obtained was subjected to a reaction with LiAlH4
(71%, two steps), followed by treatment with TBAF to provide the
diol 20 (quant). The primary and secondary hydroxyls of the diol
were protected as a TBS ether (89%) and a benzoate (96%), respec-
tively, and product 21 was treated with TBAF to give the alcohol
(99%), which was oxidized with Dess–Martin periodinane9 to pro-
vide the aldehyde 22 (98%). The Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons
reaction of the aldehyde 22 with the phosphonate 23 successfully
afforded the (E,E)-dienoate 24 (94%) as a single isomer, which was
subjected to the hydrolysis under basic conditions to accomplish
the total synthesis of MK8383 (83%). The synthetic MK8383 was
spectroscopically identical in all respects with the naturally occur-
ring MK8383,1 thereby confirming the asymmetric total synthesis
of MK8383.
In conclusion, we accomplished the first asymmetric total syn-
thesis of MK8383 by utilizing the iron-mediated coupling reaction.
In this total synthesis, the problem with the synthesis was clearly
the stereoselective construction of the (Z)-trisubstituted side-chain
alkene. However, although this problem was seemingly easy to re-
solve, in fact it presented us an opportunity to evaluate the cou-
pling reactions reported to date, and the iron-mediated coupling
reaction was found to be the only effective method for the stereo-
selective construction of the (Z)-trisubstituted side-chain alkene of
MK8383. Although the iron-mediated coupling reaction has not
been extensively applied to the synthesis of natural products,13 it
is considered relatively more reliable than other coupling reac-
tions, which failed to give the desired product as described above.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Nobuto Minowa (Meiji Seika Kaishya, Ltd, Japan)
for kindly providing a sample of MK8383. This work was finan-
cially supported in part by a Waseda University Grant for Special
Research Projects, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), and
the Global COE program ‘Center for Practical Chemical Wisdom’
by MEXT.
References and notes
1. Wakui, F.; Harimaya, K.; Iwata, M.; Sashita, R.; Chiba, N.; Mikawa, T. Jpn. Kokai
Tokkyo Koho JP 07,126, 211, May 16, 1995, Appl. Oct. 29, 1993; Chem. Abstr.
1995, 123, 105272b.
2. (a) Kobayashi, H.; Meguro, S.; Yoshimoto, T.; Namikoshi, M. Tetrahedron 2003,
59, 455–459; (b) Namikoshi, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Yoshimoto, T.; Meguro, S.;
Akano, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 1452–1457; (c) Namikoshi, M.;
Kobayashi, H.; Yoshimoto, T.; Hosoya, T. J. Antibiot. 1997, 50, 890–892.
3. Suzuki, T.; Usui, K.; Miyake, Y.; Namikoshi, M.; Nakada, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
553–556.
4. (a) Knochel, P. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.;
Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4, pp 865–911 and references cited therein; (b)
Tamao, K.. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.;
Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, pp 435–480 and references cited therein.
5. Negishi, E. Pure Appl. Chem. 1981, 53, 2333–2356. and references cited therein.
6. Corey, E. J.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 1851–1852.
7. Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 36, 3769–3772.
8. Alderdice, M.; Spino, C.; Weiler, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1643–1646.
9. (a) Dess, D. E.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 7277–7287; (b) Frigerio, M.;
Santagostino, M.; Sputore, S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4537–4538.
OTBDPS
1) DIBAL, CH2Cl2
H
-78 oC, 97%
18
2) PBr3, pyridine
Br
Et2O, room temp
H
19
OTIPS
OH
1) TBSCl, imidazole
CH2Cl2, room temp
89%
1) LiAlH4, Et2O
room temp
71% (2 steps)
H
10. Hayashi, T.; Katsuro, Y.; Okamoto, Y.; Kumada, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22,
4449–4452.
2) Bz2O, DMAP
CH2Cl2, room temp
96%
2) TBAF, THF
reflux, quant
H
11. The reaction with Me2CuLi provided the b-keto ester 15 only.
12. Corey, E. J.; Seibel, W. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 905–908.
13. (a) Reviews, see: Sherry, B. D.; Fürstner, A. Acc. Chem. Res., in press; (b)
Fürstner, A.; Martin, R. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 624–629; (c) Bolm, C.; Legros, J.;
Paih, J. L.; Zani, L. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6217–6254; (d) Cahiez, G.; Avedissian,
A. Synthesis 1998, 1199–1205. The first report regarding the iron-catalyzed
coupling reactions of Grignard reagents with alkenyl halides: (e) Tamura, M.;
Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1487–1489.
OH
20
OTBS
H
CHO
H
1) TBAF, THF
reflux, 99%
2) Dess-Martin
Oxidn, CH2Cl2
room temp
98%
H
14. Preparation of compound 18: To a stirred solution of the enol phosphonate 17
(0.0152 g, 0.0162 mmol) and Fe(acac)3 (0.0288 g, 0.0815 mmol) in a mixed
solvent (THF/NMP = 20/1, 3.15 mL) was added MeMgCl (0.324 mL, 3.0 M in
THF) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. The reaction was
quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (10 mL) and the aqueous layer was
extracted with Et2O (20 mL ꢁ 3). The combined organic layer was dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by silica gel
chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 50/1) to give the ester 18 (0.0093 g,
H
22
OBz
21
OBz
CO2Et
(EtO)2(O)P
CO2Et
23
H
82%) as
a
colorless oil: Rf = 0.52 (hexane/ethyl acetate = 10/1); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.65–7.57 (4H, m), 7.44–7.39 (6H, m), 5.75 (1H, s), 5.65
(1H, s), 4.46–4.39 (1H, m), 3.75 (1H, ddd, J = 11.7, 4.4, 4.4 Hz), 3.70 (3H, s), 3.64
(1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz), 3.50 (1H, dd, J = 9.8, 5.4 Hz), 2.72–2.64 (1H, m), 2.56–2.47
(1H, m), 1.78–1.70 (1H, m), 1.68–1.60 (2H, m), 1.59 (3H, s), 1.52 (3H, s), 1.50–
1.36 (1H, m), 1.13–0.94 (35H, m); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 166.2, 161.7,
135.5, 135.4, 134.1, 133.8, 132.5, 129.5, 127.6, 127.5, 124.0, 118.9, 73.6, 63.3,
50.8, 42.1, 42.0, 40.7, 37.6, 33.8, 31.6, 28.2, 26.7, 23.0, 22.1, 19.2, 19.2, 18.2,
12.4; IR (neat) mmax 2936, 2868, 1716, 1632, 1464, 1430, 1374, 1362, 1208,
1150, 1112, 1088, 1010, 998, 882, 862, 824, 762, 740, 702 cmꢀ1; FAB-MS
LiHMDS, THF
-78 oC to 0 oC
94%
H
OBz
24
LiOH-H2O
MK8383
EtOH / H2O (4 / 1)
83%
[M+H]+ calculated for C43H67O4Si2: 703.4578, found: 703.4599; ½a D18
ꢂ
+51.6 (c
0.4, CHCl3).
Scheme 6.