With the two segments 7 and 16 in hand, we moved on to
their coupling by the Julia-Kocienski reaction and elabora-
tion of the resulting product to lactone intermediate 21
bearing the carbon skeleton and functionalities corresponding
appropriately to those of aspergillide C (3) (Scheme 4). The
treated with KI3/NaHCO3 to give iodolactone 20, the
stereochemistry of which was assigned from its NOE
correlations (see the conformational diagram in Scheme 4).
Dehydroiodination of 20 was found to be problematic due
to side reactions triggered probably by deprotonation at the
R-position of the lactone carbonyl (for example, retro-oxy-
Michael cleavage of the dihydropyran ring).18 In the event,
this transformation was carried out using DBU in THF at
room temperature to give 21 in a moderate overall yield of
45% from 19; heating the reaction mixture led to a complex
mixture of products.
Scheme 4. Preparation of Lactone Intermediate 21
Having secured the properly functionalized lactone inter-
mediate 21, we proceeded to the final stage of the synthesis
(Scheme 5). Hydrolysis of the lactone 21 with aq LiOH (1.2
Scheme 5. Completion of the Synthesis of Aspergillide C (3)
coupling of 7 and 16 was conducted by exposing 7 to the
potassium anion generated from 16 according to Kocienski’s
procedure to afford 17 as a 10:1 E/Z mixture favoring the
desired E isomer.13 Installation of an acetate unit at the
anomeric position of 17 was effected by the Ferrier-type
reaction using silyl ketene acetal 1814 in the presence of
BF3·OEt2 in CH3CN,15 delivering the desired trans-substituted
ester 19 and its cis isomer in isolated yields of 65% and
25%, respectively,16 after chromatographic separation.17 The
olefinc ester 19 was hydrolyzed with an aqueous NaOH
solution, and the resulting reaction mixture was directly
equiv) in THF gave a lithium carboxylate salt, which after
evaporation of the water-containing solvent under reduced
pressure, was treated with 4.5 equiv of TBSOTf in DMF in
presence of DMAP and imidazole.19 TLC monitoring of the
reaction indicated that both the carboxylate anion and the
hydroxyl group of the carboxylate intermediate were pro-
tected smoothly to give a bis-TBS intermediate. Fortunately,
addition of a small amount of water to the reaction mixture
brought about selective deprotection of the TBS ester group,
giving 22 in quantitative yield over the two steps. The PMB
protecting group of 22 was then removed by DDQ oxidation,
and the resulting seco acid 23 was subjected to the Yamagu-
chi lactonization conditions to furnish 3 as a white crystalline
solid (mp 115.5-116 °C) after deprotection of the TBS ether
group. The 1H and 13C NMR of 3 were identical with those
reported for natural aspergillide C, and the specific rotation
of 3 {[R]25D +83 (c 0.14, MeOH)} was equal in sign to that
(10) For the preparation of analogous compounds of 12 by asymmetric
hetero-Diels-Alder approaches, see: (a) Mikami, K.; Motoyama, Y.; Terada,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2812–2820. (b) Bauer, T.; Chapuis, C.;
Jezewski, A.; Kozak, J.; Jurczak, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 1391–
1404. (c) Bhatt, U.; Christmann, M.; Quitschalle, M.; Claus, E.; Kalesse,
M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1885–1893. (d) Kwiatkowski, P.; Asztemborska,
M.; Jurczak, J. Tetrahedron:Asymmetry 2004, 15, 3189–3194.
(11) (a) Li, S.; Xu, R.; Bai, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3463–3466.
(b) Nakano, M.; Kikuchi, W.; Matsuo, J.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 2001,
424–425. (c) Andrus, M. B.; Shih, T.-L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8780–
8785. Wenzel, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12964–
12965.
(12) Satoh, T.; Nanba, K.; Suzuki, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1971, 19,
817–820.
of natural aspergillide C {[R]25 +66.2 (c 0.19, MeOH)},1
D
(13) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A. Synlett
1998, 26–28.
(14) Wenzel, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
12964–12965.
(17) At this stage, a small amount of the Z-isomer of 19 originating
from the 10:1 E/Z selectivity in the conversion of 7 to 17 could be removed
by column chromatography.
(15) (a) Paterson, I.; Smith, J. D.; Ward, R. A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
9413–9436. (b) Gaertzen, O.; Misske, A. M.; Wolbers, P.; Hoffmann,
H. M. R. Synlett 1999, 1041–1044. (c) Backes, J. R.; Koert, U. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 2777–2785.
(18) The difficulty in this dehydroiodination step would be ascribable
to the fact that the ꢀ-elimination of 20 demands the transition state to adopt
an energetically unfavorable conformation in which the iodine atom and
the olefinic side chain are in a 1,3-diaxial relationship.
(16) For theoretical studies on stereoselectivity in this type of substitution
reaction, see: (a) Yang, M. T.; Woerpel, K. A J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
545–553. (b) Krumper, J. R.; Salamant, W. A.; Woerpel, K. A. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 4907–4910.
(19) (a) Keck, G. E.; Romer, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6083–
6089. (b) Jayasundera, K. P.; Brodie, S. J.; Taylor, C. M. Tetrahedron 2007,
63, 10077–10082.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009
763