Fig. 2 Molecular structure of 3. The disordered diethyl ether sol-
vent molecule and all C–H hydrogen atoms except those on N(1)
˚
are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (A) and angles (deg):
Fig. 3 (a) Ball and stick model of 4. All C–H hydrogen atoms except
those on C(1) and C(27) and the toluene solvent molecule are omitted
Pt(1)–P(1) 2.2420(6), Pt(1)–Cl(1) 2.3603(6), P(1)–C(1) 1.871(3), C(1)–N(1)
1.451(4), N(1)–N(2) 1.332(3), N(2)–C(2) 1.305(4); P(1)–Pt(1)–P(1A)
101.61(3), P(1)–Pt(1)–Cl(1) 85.36(2), P(1)–Pt(1)–Cl(1A) 172.04(2),
Cl(1)–Pt(1)–Cl(1A) 87.95(3), Pt(1)–P(1)–C(1) 107.80(9), P(1)–C(1)–N(1)
110.94(19), C(1)–N(1)–N(2) 119.4(2), N(1)–N(2)–C(2) 119.1(2).
˚
for clarity. Selected bond distances (A) and angles (deg): Pt(1)–P(1)
2.2341(11), Pt(1)–P(2) 2.2436(11), Pt(1)–N(2) 2.007(3), Pt(1)–N(4)
2.007(3), P(1)–C(1) 1.820(5), C(1)–N(1) 1.299(5), N(1)–N(2) 1.345(5),
N(2)–C(2) 1.477(5), C(2)–C(28) 1.597(6), C(28)–N(4) 1.473(5), N(4)–N(3)
1.332(4), N(3)–C(27) 1.309(5), C(27)–P(2) 1.820(5); P(1)–Pt(1)–P(2)
112.31(4), N(2)–Pt(1)–N(4) 81.68(13), Pt(1)–P(1)–C(1) 97.43(15),
P(1)–C(1)–N(1) 119.3(3), C(1)–N(1)–N(2) 116.7(4), N(1)–N(2)–C(2)
116.5(3), N(2)–C(2)–C(28) 105.2(3), C(2)–C(28)–N(4) 104.9(3),
C(28)–N(4)–N(3) 117.6(3), N(4)–N(3)–C(27) 116.5(4), N(3)–C(27)–P(2)
118.9(3), C(27)–P(2)–Pt(1) 97.61(15). (b) Space filling view of 4 showing
the twisted orientation of the two fluorene groups.
=
the presence of two CHPPh2 hydrogens (by integration). The
13C{ H} NMR spectrum of 4 revealed the absence of a fluorene
1
=
N C resonance suggesting loss of double bond character.
two fluorene groups is ca. 50◦ indicating significant twisting
presumably to minimise steric interactions between these planar
aromatic rings. The X-ray structure of 4 is unique and represents
the first crystallographic example of a complex bearing a MP2C4N4
metallacyclic ring.16
(2)
In conclusion, we have shown that in one-step a coordinated
P-monodentate phosphine bearing a fluorene auxillary group can
undergo sequential P,N-chelation, C–C coupling and methylene
C–H deprotonation togive aremarkable P2N2-tetradentate ligand.
Further studies are now underway to probe the generality of this
reaction and investigate the mechanistic pathway associated with
this transformation. These results will be published in due course.
An X-ray crystallographic study† shows the unprecedented for-
mation of a P2N2-coordinated ligand at a square-planar PtII centre
in 4 (Fig. 3). The coordination sphere about Pt(1) comprises two cis
Pt–P–C–N–N five-membered chelate rings and a third Pt–N–C–
Acknowledgements
C–N metallocyclic ring formed by carbon carbon coupling
12c,15
˚
[C(2)–C(28) 1.597(6) A]
between both fluorene groups from
We would like to thank the EPSRC and Loughborough University
for funding (AJL). Johnson and Matthey are gratefully acknowl-
edged for the generous loan of precious metal salts.
each cis chelated P,N-tertiary phosphine. The PtII centre lies
0.0375 A out of the P(1)/N(2)/N(4)/P(2) coordination plane.
˚
Within each Pt–P–C–N–N ring it is clear that a change in
hybridisation (sp3 to sp2) about C(1) and C(27) has occurred
as indicated by the significant contraction of the C–N bond
Notes and references
˚
‡ Crystal data: For 2, C26H21N2OP: Mr = 408.42, triclinic, space group
lengths [1.299(5), ◦1.309(5) A] and enlarged P–C–N bond angles
¯
[119.3(3), 118.9(3) ].1b,c The N(1)–N(2) [1.345(5) A] and N(3)–N(4)
[1.332(4) A] bond lengths remain similar to those of 2 and
3 and suggest some p-electron delocalisation may exist in the
C(1)–N(1)–N(2)/C(27)–N(3)–N(4) backbones. However the
N(2)–C(2)/N(4)–C(28) distances [1.477(5), 1.473(5) A] are consid-
erably longer than found in 2 and 3 implying these should formally
be viewed as single bonds. Each Pt–P–C–N–N ring can be de-
scribed as near planar [N(1) deviates by 0.0560 A from the Pt(1)–
P1, a = 12.6349(7), b = 13.7094(8), c = 13.7679(8), a = 71.744(2),
˚
◦
3
˚
b = 84.887(2), g = 71.011(2) , V = 2141.3(2) A , T = 150(2) K, Z =
˚
4, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.148 mm-1, 9889 independent reflections measured,
dcalc = 1.267 g cm-3, R1 = 0.0446 (for 7137 data with I > 2s(I)),
wR2 = 0.1181 (all data) and 547 refined parameters. CCDC reference
number 702768. For 3·Et2O, C52H42Cl2N4PPt·C4H10O: Mr = 1124.94,
monoclinic, space group I2/a, a = 20.0646(8), b = 10.7880(4), c =
˚
3
˚
23.7050(9), b = 111.046(2), V = 4788.8(3) A , T = 150(2) K, Z = 4,
m(Mo-Ka) = 3.154 mm-1, 5835 independent reflections measured, dcalc
=
1.560 g cm-3, R1 = 0.0208 (for 4567 data with I > 2s(I)), wR2 = 0.0471
(all data), and 313 refined parameters. CCDC reference number 702769.
For 4·C7H8, C52H38N4P2Pt·C7H8: Mr = 1068.03, monoclinic, space group
P21/n, a = 12.0681(6), b = 15.7231(8), c = 25.0731(13), b = 98.648(2),
˚
˚
P(1)–C(1)–N(1)–N(2) plane; N(4) deviates by 0.0694 A from the
Pt(1)–P(2)–C(27)–N(3)–N(4) plane]. The average torsion angle
[C(3)–C(2)–C(28)–C(29), C(14)–C(2)–C(28)–C(40)] between the
3
-1
˚
V = 4703.5(4) A , T = 150(2) K, Z = 4, m(Mo-Ka) = 3.096 mm , 10772
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Dalton Trans., 2009, 30–32 | 31
©