ira-type coupling processes,7 and to the best of our knowl-
edge, transition-metal-free cross coupling between aryl and
alkynyl Grignard reagents are not known. Herein we describe
the first results on highly efficient coupling reactions of aryl
with alkynyl Grignard reagents by using the 2,2,6,6-tetram-
ethylpiperidine-N-oxyl radical (TEMPO)8 as an environ-
mentally benign commercially available oxidant.
benzene with i-PrMgCl·LiCl,12 and Mg-acetylide 2a was
readily obtained via deprotonation of phenylacetylene with
i-PrMgCl·LiCl.10 Both yield and 3a/4a selectivity were
improved by using 1.6 equiv of aryl Grignard reagent 1a
(Table 1, entry 2). Upon increasing the amount of 1a to 2.0
Transition-metal-free oxidative homocoupling of Grignard
reagents has recently gained attention.9 Along this line, we
reported on homocoupling reactions of aryl, alkenyl, and
alkynyl Grignard reagents by using TEMPO as an oxidant
(Scheme 1).10 More recently, we have also successfully
Table 1. Oxidative Coupling between 1a and 2a at 66 °C under
Different Conditions
Scheme 1. Oxidative Homocoupling of Aryl and Alkynyl
Grignard Reagents Using TEMPO and Planned Cross Coupling
entry 1a (equiv) tempo (equiv) time [h] 3aa [%] 4a [%]
of 1 and 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2.20
2.86
3.30
3.30
3.85
2.16
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
1.5
3.0
0.75
2.5
2.5
2.5
60b
79b
71
84
90
61
76
40
75
45
18c
1.6
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
7c
<2%d
<2%d
<2%d
<2%d
<2%d
<2%d
<2%d
<2%d
7e
8f
9g
10h
72
2.5
2.5
2.5
a Isolated yield. b Isolated as a mixture of 3a and 4a. c Yield was
calculated by H NMR analysis from the 3a/4a mixture. d In GC, 4a was
1
identified in traces. e Run at 25 °C. f Aryl Grignard was generated from
2,6-dimethylbromobenzene by using Mg-turnings, and phenyl alkynyl
Grignard was generated by using i-PrMgCl. g Aryl Grignard was generated
from 2,6-dimethylbromobenzene by using Mg-turnings in the presence of
1.0 equiv of LiCl. h Aryl Grignard 1a was prepared from 2,6-dimethylbro-
mobenzene via Br-Li exchange with t-BuLi followed by Li-Mg exchange
by using MgBr2.
applied these processes for preparation of various conjugated
polymers.11
During these studies, we made the important observation
that TEMPO-mediated homocoupling of aryl Grignard
reagents occurs far faster as compared to the analogous
reaction with alkynyl Grignard reagents.10 Moreover, we
found that sterically demanding aryl Grignard reagents either
react slowly or do not react at all with TEMPO.10b On the
basis of these two observations, we assumed that transition-
metal-free cross coupling reactions between aryl 1 and
alkynyl Grignard reagents 2 to form Sonogashira products
3 by using TEMPO as an oxidant should be feasible.
equiv, yield further increased to 71% without diminishing
the 3a/4a selectivity (45 min, entry 3). A slightly better yield
was noted by extending the reaction time to 2.5 h (entry 4).
The best result was obtained when 2.5 equiv of 1a and 3.85
equiv of TEMPO were used in the coupling reaction (90%,
entry 5). Decreasing the amount of TEMPO provided a worse
result (61%, entry 6). Selective cross coupling could also
be achieved at room temperature (entry 7). However, reaction
time had to be extended to 72 h. To check whether aryl
bromides can also be used as precursors, we generated
Grignard 1a from 2,6-dimethylbromobenzene by using Mg-
turnings. Oxidative cross coupling with 2a occurred with
excellent 3a/4a selectivity; however, yield was moderate
(40%, entry 8). Importantly, yield was improved to 75%
when Grignard generation was performed in the presence
of LiCl, clearly showing that also the cheaper aryl bromides
are suitable substrates for our oxidative coupling (entry 9).13
However, when Grignard 2a was generated via Br-Li
exchange followed by transmetalation with MgBr2·OEt2,11
The Grignard reagent 1a used in our initial studies was
generated via I-Mg-exchange reaction of 2,6-dimethyliodo-
(7) (a) Luque, R.; Macquarrie, D. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1627.
(b) Pru¨ger, B.; Hofmeister, G. E.; Jacobsen, C. B.; Alberg, D. G.; Nielsen,
M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 3783. (c) Protti, S.; Fagnoni,
M.; Albini, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5675. (d) DeRoy, P. L.;
Surprenant, S.; Laperle, M. B.; Yoakim, C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2741. (e)
Borah, H. N.; Prajapati, D.; Boruah, R. C. Synlett 2005, 2823. (f)
Appukkuttan, P.; Dehaen, W.; Eycken, E. V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
4713. (g) Leadbeater, N. E.; Marco, M.; Tominack, B. J. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 3919.
(8) Review: (a) Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2008, 1979. See also:
(b) Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 129. (c) Guin, J.; De Sarkar,
S.; Grimme, S.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8727. (d)
Kirchberg, S.; Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Synlett 2008, 18, 2841. (e) Vogler,
T.; Studer, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1963. (f) Kirchberg, S.; Fro¨hlich,
R.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4235.
(9) (a) Krasovskiy, A.; Tishkov, A.; del Amo, V.; Mayr, H.; Knochel,
P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5010. (b) Woltermann, C. J.; Shechter,
H. HelV. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 354.
(12) Knochel, P.; Dohle, W.; Gommermann, N.; Kneisel, F. F.; Kopp,
F.; Korn, T.; Sapountzis, I.; Vu, V. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
4302.
(10) (a) Maji, M. S.; Pfeifer, T.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 9547. (b) Maji, M. S.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2009, 2467.
(13) Anbarasan, P.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 2219.
(11) Maji, M. S.; Pfeifer, T.; Studer, A. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 5872.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3879