1204
Chemistry Letters Vol.37, No.12 (2008)
Michael Addition of Active Methylene Compounds to ꢀ,ꢁ-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds
under the Influence of Molecular Sieves in Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Tomoko Kakinuma, Ryoichi Chiba, and Takeshi OriyamaÃ
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University, 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito 310-8512
(Received September 18, 2008; CL-080894; E-mail: tor@mx.ibaraki.ac.jp)
The Michael addition of active methylene compounds to
ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated carbonyl compounds in the presence of MS
4A in dimethyl sulfoxide proceeds smoothly to afford the corre-
sponding 1,4-addition products in good to high yields.
acetonitrile were found to be ineffective for this reaction. The
desired reaction proceeded moderately in DMF and chloroform,
but we discovered that DMSO was the best solvent. The corre-
sponding 1,4-addition product was obtained in a 71% isolated
yield (Entry 7).
Next, we attempted Michael additions in the presence of
various dehydrating agents as additives in DMSO (Table 2).
When the reaction was carried out without an additive, we ob-
tained the desired compound in only 6% yield. On the other
hand, the additions of MS led to dramatic increases in the yield.
In particular, we found MS 4A, MS 13X, and Drierite (CaSO4)
to be extremely effective.9 A longer reaction time (12 h) im-
proved yields of the product as described in Entry 9.
Overall, we detemined the optimal conditions as follows:
the reaction of enones (0.3 mmol) with malononitrile
(0.36 mmol) in the presence of MS 4A (100 mg) in DMSO at
room temperature.10
We examined Michael additions of malononitrile to various
ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, as listed in Table 3. The
reactions were uniformly successful for chalcone derivatives
(Entries 1–8). In the case of sterically bulky enone, the desired
compound was obtained in 52% yield (Entry 6). It was found
that ethyl crotonate is also a good Michael acceptor (Entry 10).
When the 1,4-addition to cyclic enone was performed under sim-
ilar reaction conditions, the corresponding product was given in
only 36% yield (Entry 11). In addition, when ꢁ-nitrostyrene was
used as a Michael acceptor, we obtained the desired product in
65% yield (Entry 12).
The Michael addition is an important and useful class of
reactions in organic synthesis, and generally requires a catalyst
such as K2CO3, piperidine or LiI.1,2 On the other hand,
Shirakawa and Shimizu very recently reported that the catalyst-
free Michael addition was efficiently promoted in ethanol by
hydrogen-bonding activation.3 Much attention has been focused
on catalyst-free reactions, because reducing the use of catalyst is
environmentally friendly.
In recent years, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has received re-
newed attention as a polar solvent and a promoter of efficient or-
ganic reactions.4 We also developed several effective reactions
in DMSO. For example, cyanocarbonation of aldehydes5 and tri-
fluoromethylation of carbonyl compounds6 were documented.
During the course of our research to promote fundamental car-
bon–carbon bond-forming reactions without catalysts in
DMSO,7 a novel Henry reaction was developed successfully in
2007.8 The Henry reaction of various carbonyl compounds with
nitroalkanes proceeded very smoothly to afford the correspond-
ing ꢁ-nitroalcohol without a base catalyst. Furthermore, the 1,4-
addition of nitroalkane to ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated ketones was also per-
formed in DMSO. These results suggested that a similar Michael
addition of other active methylene compounds, such as malono-
nitrile and malonate, having larger pKa values than those of
nitroalkanes, could be performed in DMSO.
We also tested various other active methylene compounds
(Table 4). Various malonates yielded successful results (Entries
1–3). Acetylacetone was found to be a good Michael donor, as
First, we chose the reaction of chalcone (0.3 mmol) with ma-
lononitrile (0.36 mmol) in the presence of molecular sieves (MS)
4A (50 mg) as a model case for the optimization of the solvent.
As can be seen in Table 1, toluene, dichloromethane, THF, and
Table 2. Effect of dehydrating agents
Ph
CN
O
Dehydrating agent
DMSO / r t / 2 h
O
CN
CN
NC
+
Ph
Table 1. Effect of solvents
Ph
Ph
Ph O
0.3 mmol
0.36 mmol
MS 4A (50 mg)
O
CN
CN
NC
+
Yield/%a
Ph
Entry
Dehydrating agent
None
Solvent (2 mL)
r t / 2 h
Ph
Ph
CN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
6
60
71
30
70
72
34
73
92b
0.3 mmol
0.36 mmol
MS 3A (50 mg)
MS 4A (50 mg)
MS 5A (50 mg)
MS 13X (50 mg)
Drierite (50 mg)
MgSO4 (50 mg)
MS 4A (100 mg)
MS 4A (100 mg)
Entry
Solvent
Yield/%a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Toluene
CH2Cl2
THF
CH3CN
DMF
0
1
1
0
46
59
71
CHCl3
DMSO
aIsolated yield of purified product. bThe reaction was
carried out for 12 h.
aIsolated yield of purified product.
Copyright Ó 2008 The Chemical Society of Japan