ORGANIC
LETTERS
2009
Vol. 11, No. 4
915-918
A Fluorous-Tagged “Safety Catch”
Linker for Preparing Heterocycles by
Ring-Closing Metathesis
Catherine O’Leary-Steele,† Christopher Cordier,† Jerome Hayes,‡
Stuart Warriner,† and Adam Nelson*,†
School of Chemistry and Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, UniVersity
of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom, and Chemical DeVelopment,
GlaxoSmithKline, Old Powder Mill, Leigh, Tonbridge,
Kent, TN11 9AN, United Kingdom
Received December 15, 2008
ABSTRACT
A fluorous-tagged “safety catch” linker is described for the synthesis of heterocycles with use of ring-closing metathesis. The linker facilitiates
the purification of metathesis substrates, the removal of the catalyst, the functionalization of the products, and the release of only metathesis
products. The synthesis of a range of heterocycles is described.
Ring-closing metathesis has revolutionalized organic syn-
thesis.1 Ruthenium complexes are particularly functional
group tolerant,2 but the catalyst residues often need to be
scavenged.3 Recently, we developed a fluorous-tagged linker
for synthesizing heterocycles by metathesis but a fluorous-
tagged catalyst was needed to allow easy product purifica-
tion.4 We now describe a fluorous-tagged “safety catch”5
linker that facilitates the synthesis, purification, and func-
tionalization of metathesis products without the use a
fluorous-tagged catalyst (Scheme 1). We use the term
“linker” to describe compounds (e.g., 1) which are func-
tionalized to yield metathesis substrates (e.g., 2).
It was envisaged that functionalization of 1 (f 2) would
be followed by removal of excess reagents by fluorous-solid
phase extraction6 (F-SPE). Initiation of a metathesis cascade
would be expected at the terminal alkene7 of 2 (f 3).
Cyclization (f 4) would be followed by a second ring-
closing metathesis (f 5) in which a catalytically active
methylene complex was regenerated.8 Crucially, the product
5 would still be fluorous-tagged; F-SPE would thus allow
† University of Leeds.
‡ GlaxoSmithKline.
(1) (a) Deiters, A.; Martin, S. F. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2199. (b)
Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Karmakar, S.; Biswas, T.; Majumdar, K. C.;
Rahaman, H.; Roy, B. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3919. (c) Gradillas, A.; Pe´res-
Castells, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6086.
(2) Grubbs, R. H. Handbook of Metathesis, Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2003.
(4) (a) Leach, S. G.; Cordier, C. J.; Morton, D.; McKiernan, G. J.;
Warriner, S.; Nelson, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2752. (b) Morton, D.;
Leach, S.; Cordier, C.; Warriner, S.; Nelson, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 104.
(3) For example, see: (a) Ahn, Y. M.; Yang, K.; Georg, G. I. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 1411. (b) Maynard, H. D.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 4137. (c) Galan, B. R.; Kalbarczyk, K. P.; Szczepankiewicz, S.; Keister,
J. B.; Diver, S. T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1203. (d) Matsugi, M.; Curran, D. P.
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1636. (e) Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 74.
(5) Patek, M.; Lebl, M. Biopolymers 1999, 47, 353.
(6) Zhang, W.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11837.
(7) (a) Ulman, M.; Grubbs, R. H. Organomet. 1998, 17, 2484. (b)
Wallace, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1912.
10.1021/ol802848j CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 01/27/2009
2009 American Chemical Society