construct libraries of substituted indoles, (b) the general use
of indolynes as electrophilic indole surrogates, and (c) the
site preference for nucleophilic attack on indolynes, including
its variation as a function of the nucleophile.
To initiate our studies, indolyne 4 was selected as our
primary target (Figure 1).9 Interestingly, indolyne 4 would
possess both highly nucleophilic10 (at C3) and electrophilic6
(at C4 and C5) sites. As current methods for generating C3-
unsubstituted indolynes were relatively harsh for our intended
studies (i.e., KNH2/NH3 or BuLi),7,8,11 we sought an alterna-
tive method to access the key indolyne species 4. The
approach to arynes by Kobayashi appeared optimal, as it
would permit indolyne formation from an indolyl silyltriflate
precursor using mild fluoride-mediated conditions.12
Although the synthesis of an appropriate indolyl silyltriflate
proved challenging,13 an efficient route was ultimately
developed (Scheme 1). Commercially available 5-benzy-
loxyindole (13) was converted to hydroxyindole 14 following
a known two-step sequence.14,15 Next, hydroxyindole 14 was
allowed to react with isopropyl isocyanate in the presence
of cat. Et3N to afford carbamate 15. The net conversion of
13 to carbamate 15 proceeds in 85% yield and requires only
one final chromatographic purification event. Following the
protocol disclosed by Snieckus and Hoppe,16 carbamate 15
was lithiated and quenched with TMSCl to provide silyl
carbamate 16.17 Of note, the relatively acidic C2 proton of
the N-methylindole is not disturbed in this process, which is
testament to the outstanding ortho-directing ability of car-
bamates.18 Although initial attempts to elaborate silyl car-
bamate 16 to silyltriflate 17 in a stepwise fashion were met
with difficulty,19 an efficient one-pot deprotection/triflation
sequence proved successful. Our optimized route to silyl-
triflate 17 can be carried out on multigram scale, and
proceeds in 63% overall yield. To confirm that silyltriflate
17 would function as a suitable precursor to the targeted 4,5-
indolyne, 17 was reacted with TBAF in the presence of furan
(10) to afford Diels-Alder product 18 in 85% yield.
Figure 1. Indolyne 4 as an electrophilic indole surrogate.
Although heteroaromatic arynes have been a subject of
debate in the past,5a the existence of indolynes has been
substantiated by experimental data. In the 1960s, it was found
that C3-unsubstituted 4,5-indolyne 6 could be generated from
5-bromoindole (5) and KNH2 in ammonia to afford a
complex mixture of products, which upon purification
furnished 4- and 5-aminoindole products 7 and 8 (Figure
2).7 In 2007, the Buszek laboratory demonstrated that C3-
substituted indolynes could be generated from dihaloindoles
in the presence of butyllithium reagents.8a The presumed
indolyne intermediates were trapped with furan to afford
Diels-Alder products (e.g., 9 + 10 f 12). Further studies
have recently been reported8b,c that include indolyne
Diels-Alder reactions of substituted furans and cyclopen-
tadiene.
(9) Attempts to synthesize 2,3-indolynes have been met without success;
see: (a) Muller, H. Dissertation, University of Heidelberg, 1964. (b)
Hoffman, R. W. Dehydrobenzene and Cycloalkynes; Academic Press: New
York, 1967. (c) Conway, S. C.; Gribble, G. W. Heterocycles 1992, 34,
2095–2108. See also ref 5a.
Figure 2. Previous syntheses of indolynes.
(10) For the nucleophilicity of N-methylindole, see: Mayr, H.; Kempf,
B.; Ofial, A. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 66–77.
(11) During preparation of this manuscript, Buszek and co-workers
reported the synthesis of C3-substituted indolyl silyltriflates using a Fischer
indolization strategy; see ref 8b.
Despite these significant advances in the chemistry of
indolynes, many areas have remained unexplored, namely
(a) the potential to utilize indolynes as building blocks to
(12) Himeshima, Y.; Sonoda, T.; Kobayashi, H. Chem. Lett. 1983, 12,
1211–1214.
(13) Challenges are primarily associated with the acidity of the C2
hydrogen and the electron-rich nature of the indole ring (e.g., undesired
reactivity at C3 and propensity to undergo protodesilylation at C4).
(14) (a) Stadlwieser, J. F.; Dambaur, M. E. HelV. Chim. Acta 2006, 89,
936–946. (b) Gwaltney, S. L.; et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11,
(6) For recent reviews regarding aryne chemistry and synthetic applica-
tions, see: (a) Pellissier, H.; Santelli, M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 701–730.
(b) Wenk, H. H.; Winkler, M.; Sander, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 502–528. (c) Sanz, R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2008, 40, 217–291.
(7) (a) Julia, M.; Huang, Y.; Igolen, J. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. C 1967,
265, 110–112. (b) Igolen, J.; Kolb, A. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. C 1969, 269,
54–56. For related studies, see: (c) Julia, M.; Goffic, F. L.; Igolen, J.;
Baillarge, M. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. C 1967, 264, 118–120. (d) Julia, M.;
Igolen, J.; Kolb, M. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. C 1971, 273, 1776–1777.
(8) (a) Buszek, K. R.; Luo, D.; Kondrashov, M.; Brown, N.; Vander-
Velde, D. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4135–4137. (b) Brown, N.; Luo, D.;
VanderVelde, D.; Yang, S.; Brassfield, A.; Buszek, K. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
2009, 50, 63–65. (c) Buszek, K. R.; Brown, N.; Luo, D. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 201–204.
871–874
.
(15) 5-Hydroxyindoles can also be readily prepared by the classic
Nenitzescu indole synthesis; for a review, see: Allen, G. R. Org. React.
1973, 20, 337–454
.
(16) (a) Kauch, M.; Snieckus, V.; Hoppe, D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
7149–7158. (b) Kauch, M.; Hoppe, D. Synthesis 2006, 1578–1589.
(17) For the selective C4 lithiation of a related N-silylated substrate,
see: Griffen, E. J.; Roe, D. G.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1484–
1485.
(18) Snieckus, V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 879–933.
(19) Cleavage of the carbamate of 16 was routinely accompanied by
loss of the C4 silyl substituent under a variety of reaction conditions.
1008
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 4, 2009