2.39 (s, 3H), 1.96 (s, 2H), 1.57 (s, 6H), 0.93 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.3, 145.8, 139.8, 138.8, 137.2, 134.6, 133.0,
128.8, 128.1, 127.8, 125.6, 55.5, 51.1, 31.3, 31.1, 28.8, 19.8, 19.4;
LCMS (M + H) 362. Anal. Calcd for C24H31N3: C, 79.73; H, 8.64;
N, 11.62. Found: C, 79.69; H, 8.60; N, 11.59.
Typical Procedure 2: Isooctyl Group Removal To Prepare
5. Isooctylaminoquinoxalines 4 (5 mmol) were dissolved in 4 N
HCl in dioxane and the solution was stirred at rt for 3 h. The
reaction mixture was carefully added to ice-cold sat. aq NaHCO3
solution and, when CO2 evolution seized, the mixture was extracted
with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). Combined organic extracts were
dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo.
1
The products were at least 90% pure as judged by H NMR and
were used in the next step without further purification.
1
5b: white solid, mp 171-173 °C (methanol); H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.79 (dd, J ) 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.52
(m, 3H), 7.45 (s, 1H), 5.16 (s, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H); 13
C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.8, 144.2, 139.8, 139.3, 137.0, 136.6,
134.6, 129.0, 128.7, 128.0, 124.7, 20.0, 19.5; LCMS (M + H) 250.
ANal. Calcd for C16H15N3: C, 77.08; H, 6.06; N, 16.85. Found: C,
77.13; H, 6.11; N, 16.89.
FIGURE 1. Possible regiochemical outcomes15,16 of the GB-MCR of
5 and through-space interactions observed in the NOESY spectrum of
6c.
Typical Procedure 3: The Groebke-Blackburn Reaction
To Prepare 6. A solution of 5 (1 mmol) in 50:50 MeOH/MeCN
(10 mL) was treated with an aldehyde (1 mmol) and the mixture
was stirred at rt for 3 h. To the resulting solution (often cloudy)
was added TMSCl (1 mmol) in a minimum volume of DCM, then
the mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min, an isocyanide (1
mmol) was added, and the mixture was heated at 50 °C over 20-72
h. When the reaction was complete (as judged by TLC and LCMS
analyses), the mixture was cooled to rt and partitioned between
sat. aq NaHCO3 (25 mL) and ethyl acetate (25 mL). The aqueous
layer was further extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 25 mL). The
combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Chromatography on silica gel
with an appropriate gradient (0-10%) of methanol in DCM
provided the target compounds 6a-k in yields indicated in Table
1.
medicinally relevant17 compounds. Biological profiling of the
described compounds is currently underway in our laboratories.
The results of these studies will be disclosed in due course.
Experimental Section
Typical Procedure 1: Synthesis of Quinoxalines 4. The starting
o-phenylenediamine (10 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous metha-
nol (50 mL) and the solution was thoroughly degassed by
freeze-thaw technique. To the solution were added concentrated
HCl (10 mmol) and equimolar amounts of the aldehyde and the
isocyanide. The reaction mixture was stirred in argon atmosphere
at rt for 18 h. The methanol was evaporated in vacuo. The resi-
due was partitioned between sat. aq NaHCO3 and chloroform and
the aqueous layer was further extracted with chloroform. The
combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was taken
up in dry benzene (the amount of benzene was such that the mixture
is transparent to slightly cloudy, usually e50 mL on the scale
described) and a solution of DDQ in a small amount of benzene
was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was stirred at rt for
1-3 h. The precipitate of hydroquinone was filtered off and washed
with toluene. The combined filtrate and washings were concentrated
in vacuo and the quinoxalines 4 were isolated chromatographically
(SiO2) with ethyl acetate-hexane mixtures as eluent.
1
6e: brown sticky solid; H NMR (300 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 9.29
(s, 1H), 8.86 (s, 1H), 8.75 (d, J ) 7.9 Hz, 2H), 8.56 (d, J ) 3.8
Hz, 1H), 8.45 (d, J ) 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.53 (m, 4H),
5.24 (t, J ) 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (t, J ) 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.34 - 3.42 (m,
2H), 3.11 (q, J ) 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.86 (m,
2H), 1.08 (t, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 Hz, d6-DMSO) δ
147.6, 147.5, 137.0, 136.1, 134.8, 134.5, 134.4, 133.6, 133.4, 133.3,
129.9, 129.6, 127.8, 126.1, 123.7, 116.0, 95.6, 67.8, 65.4, 45.9,
29.7, 20.2, 19.3, 15.1; LCMS (M + H+) 452. Anal. Calcd for
C28H29N5O: C, 74.48; H, 6.47; N, 15.51. Found: C, 74.54; H, 6.49;
N, 15.55.
4b: gray solid, mp 143-145 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ
7.64 (d, J ) 5.9 Hz, 3H), 7.52 (m, 4H), 4.98 (s, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H),
Acknowledgment. We would like to thank Dr. Alexander
Manaev of the Chemical Diversity Research Institute for his
help in obtaining X-ray crystallography data.
(17) Imidazo[1,2-a]quinoxaline fragment is present in a variety of biologically
active compounds with various types of activity, e.g.: (a) Moarbess, G.; Deleuze-
Masquefa, C.; Bonnard, V.; Gayraud-Paniagua, S.; Vidal, J.-R.; Bressolle, F.;
Pinguet, F.; Bonnet, P.-A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6601–6610. (b)
Moarbess, G.; El-Hajj, H.; Kfoury, Y.; El-Sabban, M. E.; Lepelletier, Y.;
Hermine, O.; Deleuze-Masquefa, C.; Bonnet, P.-A.; Bazarbachi, A. Blood 2008,
111, 3770–3777. (c) Belema, M.; Bunker, A.; Nguyen, V. N.; Beaulieu, F.;
Ouellet, C.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Martel, A.; Burke, J. R.; McIntyre, K. W.; Pattoli,
M. A.; Daloisio, C.; Gillooly, K. M.; Clarke, W. J.; Brassil, P. J.; Zusi, F. C.;
Vyas, D. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4284–4289. (d) Deleuze-
Masquefa, C.; Gerebtzoff, G.; Subra, G.; Fabreguettes, J.-R.; Ovens, A.; Carraz,
M.; Strub, M.-P.; Bompart, J.; George, P.; Bonnet, P.-A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2004, 12, 1129–1139.
Supporting Information Available: Characterization data
for the newly synthesized compounds (4a-c, 5a-c, 6a-k) and
an X-ray crystallographic file (CIF) for compound 6f. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
JO900050K
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 6, 2009 2629