selected triphenylamine as donor and high electron affinity
peripheral group -CHO as acceptor (Scheme 1) to construct
dendritic molecule P1. The electronic and vibronic coupling
between the D-π-A dipolar branches is anticipated to
increase the two-photon absorption (TPA) efficiency.10 The
efficient intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) favors the
formation of highly polar emissive state (with red-shifted
weak emission in polar medium).11,12 The selective reaction
of the aldehyde end group with N-terminal cysteines to form
thiazolidines13 (Scheme 2), for example, may alter the ICT
characteristics in the molecule, which can manifest enhanced
fluorescence. For example, after reaction with target mol-
ecules, the ICT switch off and the highly polar emissive state
disappears leading to blue-shifted and greatly enhanced
emission in polar medium.
Scheme 1. Synthesis Route of Probe P1
Scheme 2
.
Reaction Mechanism between Aldehyde and
Cysteine
that variations in sample environment and probe distribution
may be problematic for utilization in quantitative measure-
ments. On the other hand, to image the distribution of Cys/
Hcy in cellular processes, suitable turn-on fluorescence
chemosensors for Cys/Hcy should be developed. Thus, a
probe exhibiting greatly changed emission intensity (turn-
on/off) as well as large emission peak shift is ideal for
sensing but leaves a great challenge for design and synthesis.
Compared to traditional ratiometric sensing, two-photon
excited fluorescence (TPEF) microscopy offers many ad-
vantages in the biology community. Two-photon absorption
(TPA) is a process by which two photons are simultaneously
absorbed to an excited-state in a medium via a virtual state.6
TPA has the advantage of high transmission at low incident
intensity for incident light with an optical frequency below
the band gap frequency. In recent years, materials with a
large TPA cross-section have received considerable attention
because of their interesting frequency up-conversion mech-
anism and potential applications in three-dimensional fluo-
rescence imaging, optical data storage, lithographic micro-
fabrication, and photodynamic therapy.7-9 Owing to their
ability to image at an increased penetration depth in tissue
with reduced photodamage, two-photon active fluorescent
chromophores have received increasing attention.8,9 How-
ever, creation of efficient turn-on/off TPEF probes is still in
its infancy. To address these limitations, our strategy in this
work is to design a turn-on probe with both greatly enhanced
emission intensity and large peak shift, which can be
monitored by both one- and two-photon excitations. We
Six-branched molecule P1 was synthesized by successive
Sonogashira coupling (Scheme 1). The yield of compound
2 is moderate (34%) because it is difficult to limit the reaction
to the formation of only two branches. Compounds 3, 4, and
P1 were achieved in the following steps with high yields.
Two-photon absorption cross-sections were measured by the
two-photon induced fluorescence method.14 To avoid pos-
sible complications due to the excited-state excitation, we
have used femtosecond (fs) laser pulses. TPA intensity is
characterized by the TPA cross-section (δ). The TPA
spectrum of P1 is shown in Figure 1, from which we can
see it exhibits very strong TPA with δmax of 938 GM (1 GM
) 10-50 cm4 s photon-1 molecule-1) at around 800 nm. The
log-log dependence of two-photon excited emission power
on the incident power (Figure 1, inset, at 800 nm as an
example) with slope of 1.96 indicates the occurrence of
nonlinear absorption. It is important that P1 exhibit high
emission yield in toluene (Φ ) 93%) but show marked
difference in their emission yields in polar solvents (Φ )
3.8% in dichloromethane and 1.6% in DMSO). This medium-
dependent emission is due to strong ICT. A polar emissive
state with weak emission intensity and red-shifted peak
position is favored in polar solvents.
(10) (a) Beljonne, D.; Wenseleers, W.; Zojer, E.; Shuai, Z.; Vogel, H.;
Pond, S. J. K.; Perry, J. W.; Marder, S. R.; Bre´das, J.-L. AdV. Funct. Mater.
2002, 12, 631. (b) Wang, Y.; He, G. S.; Prasad, P. N.; Goodson, T., III.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10128. (c) Varnavski, O.; Yan, X.; Mongin,
O.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Goodson, T., III. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111,
149.
(6) Go¨ppert-Mayer, M. Ann Phys. 1931, 9, 273.
(7) See reviews:(a) Walker, E.; Dvornikov, A.; Coblentz, K.; Esener,
S.; Rentzepis, P. Optics Exp. 2007, 15, 12264. (b) LaFratta, C. N.; Fourkas,
J. T.; Baldacchini, T.; Farrer, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6238.
(11) Goodson, T., III. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 99
(12) Terenziani, F.; Painelli, A.; Katan, C.; Charlot, M.; Blanchard-
Desce, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15742
.
(c) Dunn, R. C. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2891
.
(8) (a) Kim, H. M.; Jung, C.; Kim, B. R.; Jung, S.-Y.; Hong, J. H.; Ko,
Y.-G.; Lee, K. J.; Cho, B. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3460. (b)
So, P. T. C.; Dong, C. Y.; Masters, B. R.; Berland, K. M. Annu. ReV.
.
(13) (a) Zhang, L.; Tam, J. P. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 233, 87. (b) Villain,
M.; Vizzavona, J.; Rose, K. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 673. (c) Falsey, J. R.;
Renil, M.; Park, S.; Li, S.; Lam, K. S. Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 346.
(d) Tolbert, T. J.; Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2171.
(14) Xu, C.; Webb, W. W. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 481.
Biomed. Eng. 2000, 2, 399
.
(9) He, G. S.; Tan, L.-S.; Zheng, Q.; Prasad, P. N. Chem. ReV. 2008,
108, 1245
.
1258
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009