One-Carbon Ring Expansion of Azetidines
SCHEME 2. Radical Pair Mechanism for the Stevens
[1,2]-Shift
than one competent migrating group on the ammonium nitrogen,
selective rearrangement is possible if there is a significant
energetic difference between the two possible radical pairs. In
the specific case of azetidine 1a, exclusive formation of
pyrrolidines 4a,b indicates that release of ring strain is a
significant factor in bond homolysis selectivity, since benzyl
groups show greater migratory aptitude than CH2CO2R in
acyclic substrates. The n-pentyl group of 1b is expected to have
limited migratory aptitude, so successful ring expansion in those
cases is not surprising. The presence of ꢀ-hydrogens on the side
chain does permit a possible R′,ꢀ-fragmentation process by
the intermediate ylide; however, no evidence was seen for the
formation of the simple dealkylation products 8c,d. As with
1a, rapid homolytic ring opening appears to be the predominant
fate of the azetidinium ylide.
Observation of exclusive ring expansion by N-allyl substrate
1c merits further comment. While the allyl group is capable of
undergoing Stevens [1,2]-shift via the usual radical pair mech-
anism, the alternative concerted [2,3]-shift process is also
possible. In those cases where both rearrangement pathways
are possible, the [2,3]-shift appears to occur more readily for
ammonium,20 sulfonium,21 and oxonium22 ylides, presumably
due to a lower activation barrier for the concerted process. The
absence of any [2,3]-shift product from 1c again indicates the
important effect of ring strain in azetidinium ylide rearrangements.
Azetidines 1d,e lacking a conjugating group on the migrating
carbon were chosen to test the limits of ring strain as a
predisposing factor in migratory aptitude. gem-Dimethyl sub-
stitution in the case of 1d was expected to provide moderate
stabilization of the radical intermediate, consistent with other
examples of [1,2]-shift by tertiary radicals lacking any conjugat-
ing groups.23 In fact, a surprisingly good yield of N-benzyl-
3,3,-dimethylproline ethyl ester 4j was obtained, with no
evidence for competing benzyl shift. Formation of the corre-
sponding benzoyl-substituted 4l in only modest yield is disap-
pointing, but oxidative decomposition analogous to that seen
for 4o may be occurring.24 The failure to observe comparable
results with diazo partners 2b,d is puzzling, and requires further
investigation. The behavior of the simple N-benzylazetidine 1e
is especially intriguing. As mentioned above, Hatu and Wa-
tanabe had previously reported successful ring expansion to
provide protected proline 4n, a result that we confirmed.
Likewise, treatment with diazoacetophenone also leads to
pyrrolidine product (4o). However, doubly stabilized ylides
derived from diazomalonate or the corresponding ketoester
provide only the benzyl [1,2]-shift products 6a,b. Failure to react
via the ring expansion pathway in these cases indicates the limits
of ring strain as a deciding factor in migratory selectivity. It is
possible that doubly stabilized ammonium ylides, which are
generally slower to rearrange than their monostabilized coun-
terparts, are more sensitive to the stability of the radical on the
may be due to the greater acidity of the adjacent R proton in
comparison to carboethoxy-substituted cases (e.g., 4a,d,g,j,n),
and no such reactivity is expected from malonate- or ketoester-
derived products, due to the absence of an acidic proton adjacent
to the ring nitrogen.
The Stevens [1,2]-shift of ammonium ylides is believed to
involve a stepwise homolytic mechanism (Scheme 2).16 In light
of the likely intermediacy of a biradical, it is not surprising that
pyrrolidines 4a,d,f,g,i were formed as diastereomeric mixtures.
In the case of spirocyclic ammonium ylides resulting from
intramolecular metallocarbene addition high diastereoselectivity
was seen, with high levels of retention of configuration during
migration of an ester-substituted center.6 On the other hand,
with monocyclic ylides such as 3, although face-selective
metallocarbene addition cis to the neighboring ester is expected
to predominate,17 both rotamers of the exocyclic ylide N-C
bond are likely to be present. Even if the subsequent [1,2]-shift
occurred with retention, both diastereomers would be expected.
Moreover, if the biradical intermediate persists long enough to
randomize, little diastereoselectivity would be expected in the
eventual radical recombination step.18
The radical center, residing at the former ylide carbon, is
stabilized by both the electron-withdrawing substituent and the
basic nitrogen.19 Typically, the migrating group is substituted
with a moiety able to stabilize the other radical center through
conjugation (e.g., aryl, alkenyl, or carbonyl). If there is more
(16) (a) Heard, G. L.; Yates, B. F. Aust. J. Chem. 1995, 48, 1413–1423. (b)
Ollis, W. D.; Rey, M.; Sutherland, I. O. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983,
1009–1027.
(21) Vedejs, E.; Arnost, M. J.; Hagen, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3230–
3238.
(22) (a) West, F. G.; Eberlein, T. H.; Tester, R. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1993, 2857–2859. (b) Marmsa¨ter, F. P.; Vanecko, J. A.; West, F. G.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2027–2040. (c) For the role of transition metal catalysts
in periselectivity, see: Marmsa¨ter, F. P.; Vanecko, J. A.; West, F. G. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 1657–1660.
(23) (a) Tester, R. W.; West, F. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4631–4634.
(b) West, F. G.; Naidu, B. N. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6051–6056.
(24) None of the 3,3-dimethyl-2-pyrrolidinone product analogous to 7 was
isolated from reaction of 1d with 2c.
(25) For a related example of exclusive benzyl migration rather than ring
expansion of an azetidinium ylide stabilized by ester and trifluoromethyl groups,
see: Osipov, S. N.; Sewald, N.; Kolomiets, A. F.; Fokin, A. V.; Burger, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 615-618.
(17) (a) Vedejs, E.; Arco, M. J.; Powell, D. W.; Renga, J. M.; Singer, S. P.
J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 4831–4837. (b) Kawanishi, N.; Fujiwara, K.; Shirai,
N.; Sato, Y.; Hatano, K.; Kurono, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 3013–
3016. (c) Glaeske, K. W.; West, F. G. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 31–33.
(18) Epimerization of one or both stereocenters may also occur during the
reaction. However, since the diastereomeric mixtures were inseparable, it was
not possible to probe for this by resubjecting pure diastereomers to the reaction
conditions.
(19) (a) Welle, F. M.; Beckhaus, H.-D.; Ru¨chardt, C. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 552–558. (b) Schulze, R.; Beckhaus, H.-D.; Ru¨chardt, C. Chem. Ber. 1993,
126, 1031–1038.
(20) (a) Roberts, E.; Sanc¸on, J. P.; Sweeney, J. B. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2075–
2078. (b) Jemison, R. W.; Laird, T.; Ollis, W. D.; Sutherland, I. O. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 1450–1461.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 7, 2009 2835