toward a more efficient diisopinocampheylboron triflate
(Ipc2BOTf, 2)-mediated aldol reaction of esters.
tivity. The enolization of 1a with (-)-2 in the presence of
iPr2NEt at -78 °C for 4 h and aldolization of 4a at -78 °C
for 4 h achieved only a 3:2 mixture of syn- (major) and anti-
products (entry 1, Table 1). The ratio of the syn-product could
Very few reports on the boron-mediated aldol reaction of
esters have appeared in the literature since the description
of (E)-enolborinates of thioesters by Masamune three decades
ago.7 This could be attributed to the report of a failed attempt
to enolize methyl propionate using dibutylboron triflate.8
Successful B-bromodiazaborolidine and B-iododicyclohex-
ylborane-mediated aldol reaction of esters were later reported
by Corey9 and Brown,10 respectively.11 A decade ago
Masamune and Abiko amended the literature12 with the
dialkylboron triflate-mediated enolization of esters, followed
by aldolization of aldehydes, which led to a substrate-
controlled asymmetric aldol reaction of norephedrine-derived
ester enolates.12b-d They obtained either syn- or anti-R-
methyl-ꢀ-hydroxy esters, depending on the alkyl group on
boron.12d Herein, we report a convenient and general,
reagent-controlled, diastereo- and enantioselective aldol
reaction of diisopinocampheylboron enolates of esters (Scheme
2) and its application to the double diastereoselective
synthesis of the C11-C17 subunit of (-)-dictyostatin.
i
be increased to 6:1 by replacing Pr2NEt with Et3N, under
similar conditions. Subsequently, a change in the enolization
temperature to 0 °C for 5 h dramatically increased the syn-
diastereomer ratio to 97:3.
The optimal conditions were finally established by com-
mencing the enolate formation at -78 °C for 30 min and
then warming to 0 °C for 4 h, followed by aldolization at
-78 °C, when the hydroxy ester was obtained in 85% yields
with a 99:1 diastereoselectivity and 98:2 enantioselectivity.
Notably, the enolization temperature influences the diaste-
reoselectivity, whereas the aldolization conditions have little
or no effect.
Scheme 3
.
Effect of Ester Group on Stereo- and
Enantioselectivity
Scheme 2
Under these standardized conditions, we examined the
stereoselection by varying the alkyl group of the propionates
(1b-e) and identified methyl propionate (1a) as the ester of
choice for the preparation of syn-aldols. Although the
enantioselectivity remained high, a gradual decrease of syn-
diastereoselectivity was observed for ethyl, benzyl, and
isopropyl esters (1b-d). The enolization was very slow for
tert-butyl propionate (1e) (Scheme 3), and aldolization
provided the anti-aldol (9a) essentially exclusively in 50%
yields with 60% ee, much higher than typically observed
for the anti-aldols obtained with diisopinocampheyl boron
enolates of ketones.2a The reversal of diastereoselection is
similar to what has been noted earlier by Corey, Brown, and
Masamune.9-10,12 Remarkably, when Et3N was replaced with
iPr2NEt, the anti-selectivity increased from 1:4 to 95:5 for
1d and the exclusive anti-aldol product was achieved with
1e (Scheme 4).
With prior knowledge that the stereochemical course of
the ester-aldol reaction can be controlled by choosing
appropriate reagents and amines,13 the enolization of methyl
propionate (1a) with diisopinocampheylboron triflate (2),
prepared from diisopinocampheylborane and triflic acid,2a
and subsequent aldolization of cinnamaldehyde (4a)14 was
optimized to achieve maximum diastereo- and enantioselec-
(5) (a) Ramachandran, P. V.; Srivastava, A.; Hazra, D. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 157. For other total syntheses of dictyostatin, see: (b) Paterson, I.; Britton,
R.; Delgado, O.; Meyer, A.; Poullennec, K. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 4629. (c) Shin, Y.; Fournier, J.; Fukui, Y.; Bruckner, A. M.; Curran,
D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4633. (d) O’Neil, G. W.; Phillips,
A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5340.
(6) Brown, H. C.; Narla, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 219.
(7) (a) Hirama, M.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 2225.
(8) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Vogel, E.; Taber, T. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1981, 103, 3099.
These processes were then extended to a diverse set of
aldehydes. Under the optimized conditions for syn-aldols
(9) (a) Corey, E. J.; Imwinkelried, R.; Pikul, S.; Xiang, Y. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5493. (b) Corey, E. J.; Kim, S. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 4976.
(10) (a) Brown, H. C.; Dhar, R. K.; Ganesan, K.; Singaram, B. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 499. (b) Brown, H. C.; Dhar, R. K. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 2716. (c) Ganesan, K.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2336.
(11) Boron-mediated aldol reactions of glycolates have been reported.
(a) Andrus, M. B.; Sekhar, B. B. V. S.; Meredith, E. L.; Dalley, N. K. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 3035. (b) Lang, F.; Zewge, D.; Song, Z. J.; Biba, M.; Dormer,
P.; Tschaen, D.; Volante, R. P.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
5285.
(12) (a) Abiko, A.; Liu, J.-F.; Masamune, S. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
2590. (b) Abiko, A.; Liu, J.-F.; Masamune, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 2586. (c) Abiko, A.; Liu, J.-F.; Buske, D. C.; Moriyama, S.; Masamune,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7168. (d) Inoue, T.; Liu, J.-F.; Buske,
D. C.; Abiko, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5250.
(13) Abiko, A.; Liu, J.-F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 387.
(14) Cinnamaldehyde (4a) was chosen because of the ease in the
chromatographic separation of the product aldol.
1468
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 7, 2009