EnantioselectiVe Hydrogenation of Quinolines
SCHEME 1. The Synthesis of 2-Benzylquinolines
After we reported our initial work on iridium-catalyzed
asymmetric hydrogenation of quinolines, several other groups
communicated their results in this area.9-15 Fan, Xu, and Chan
reported an air-stable catalyst system Ir/P-Phos/I2 for the
asymmetric hydrogenation of quinoline derivatives with 92%
ee.9a Similar results were subsequently described by their group
with chiral ligands based on H8-BINAPO and 1,1′-spirobiindane
backbone.9 Reetz found that chiral BINOL-derived diphospho-
nites further linked to an achiral diphenyl ether unit were also
effective for the asymmetric hydrogenation of quinolines.10 In
2006, Chan showed the usefulness of PQ-Phos as a chiral ligand
in this hydrogenation reaction.11 Fan and co-workers developed
enantioselective hydrogenation of quinolines by Ir(BINAP)-
cored dendrimers with dramatic enhancement of catalytic
activity, and the TON was up to 43 000.12a Later, the same group
reported ruthenium- and iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydro-
genation of quinolines with up to 99% ee.12b,c Rueping
developed BINOL-derived chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed
asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of 2-substituted and 3-sub-
stituted quinolines with up to 99% ee and 86% ee, respectively.13
Du explored double axially chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed
asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of 2-substituted and 2,3-
disubstituted quinolines using Hantzsch esters as the hydrogen
source.14 Despite all the aforementioned excellent examples,
the substrate scope mainly focused on 2-alkyl, 2-aryl-substituted,
and 3-substituted quinoline derivatives. Highly enantioselective
hydrogenation of other quinoline substrates elaborately remains
a challenging task, particularly with 2-benzylquinolines and
2-functionalized and 2,3-disubstituted quinolines, since the
hydrogenation products are important organic synthetic inter-
mediates and structural units of alkaloids and biologically active
compounds. In this article, we present highly enantioselective
Ir-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-benzylquinolines
and 2-functionalized and 2,3-disubstituted quinolines with up
to 96% ee. Moreover, mechanistic studies revealed the hydro-
genation mechanism of quinolines involves a 1,4-hydride
addition, isomerization, and 1,2-hydride addition, and the
catalytic active species may be an Ir(III) complex with chloride
and iodide.
Results and Discussion
Asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-benzylquinolines is the most
convenient route to 2-benzyltetrahydroquinolin derivatives, but
no effective synthetic method of 2-benzylquinolines is provided.
In 2007, Oshima and co-workers reported a potent method for
the synthesis of 2-benzylpyridine derivatives from 2-(2-py-
ridyl)ethanol derivatives and aryl halides by Pd-catalyzed
chelation-assisted cleavage of unstrained Csp3-Csp3 bonds.16
To our delight, 2-benzylquinolines could also be conveniently
prepared according to the above procedure. Treatment of aryl
halides in the presence of cesium carbonate and a palladium
catalyst in refluxing xylene or toluene provided 2-benzylquino-
lines with moderate to good yields (Scheme 1).
The hydrogenation of these 2-benzyl-substituted quinolines
was studied after their synthesis. In our initial study, 2-ben-
zylquinoline was chosen as the model substrate for reaction
optimization. On the basis of our previous results,7 we first
examined the effect of solvents on the reactivity and enanti-
oselectivity using [Ir(COD)Cl]2/(S)-MeO-Biphep/I2 as the cata-
lyst. As shown in Table 1, the reaction was strongly solvent-
dependent. Low reactivity and moderate enantioselectivity were
obtained in CH2Cl2. Excellent reactivity and the highest enan-
tioselectivity were obtained in toluene (Table 1, entry 4).
Subsequently, some commercially available chiral bidentate
phosphine ligands were also tested (Table 1, entries 4-8), and
(S)-MeO-BiPhep gave the best results with 94% ee (Table 1,
entry 4). It should be noted that the hydrogenation could not
take place in the absence of iodine.
(7) (a) Wang, W.-B.; Lu, S.-M.; Yang, P.-Y.; Han, X.-W.; Zhou, Y.-G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10536–10537. (b) Lu, S.-M.; Han, X.-W.; Zhou, Y.-G.
AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 909–912. (c) Lu, S.-M.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Han, X.-
W.; Zhou, Y.-G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2260–2263. (d) Zhao, Y.-J.;
Wang, Y.-Q.; Zhou, Y.-G. Chin. J. Catal. 2005, 26, 737–739. (e) Wang, D.-W.;
Zeng, W.; Zhou, Y.-G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 1103–1107. (f) Lu,
S.-M.; Han, X.-W.; Zhou, Y.-G. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 3065–3069.
(g) Wang, X.-B.; Zhou, Y.-G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5640–5642. (h) Wang,
D.-W.; Lu, S.-M.; Zhou, Y.-G Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1282-1285. For the
personnel account, see the ref 1f.
(8) Yang, P.-Y.; Zhou, Y.-G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 1145–1149.
(9) (a) Xu, L. J.; Lam, K. H.; Ji, J. X.; Fan, Q.-H.; Lo, W.-H.; Chan, A. S. C.
Chem. Commun. 2005, 1390–1392. (b) Lam, K. H.; Xu, L. J.; Feng, L. C.; Fan,
Q.-H.; Lam, F. L.; Lo, W.-H.; Chan, A. S. C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347,
1755–1758. (c) Wu, J.; Chan, A. S. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 711–720. (d)
Tang, W.-J.; Zhu, S.-F.; Xu, L.-J.; Zhou, Q.-L.; Fan, Q.-H.; Zhou, H.-F.; Lam,
K.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. Commun. 2007, 613–615. (e) Chan, S.-H.; Lam, K.-
H.; Li, Y.-M.; Xu, L.-J.; Tang, W.-J.; Lam, F.-L.; Lo, W.-H.; Yu, W.-Y.; Fan,
Q.-H.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 2625–2631.
(10) Reetz, M. T.; Li, X.-G. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2159–2160.
(11) Qiu, L.; Kwong, F. Y.; Wu, J.; Lam, W. H.; Chan, S.; Yu, W.-Y.; Li,
Y.-M.; Guo, R.; Zhou, Z.; Chan, A. S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5955–
5965.
(12) (a) Wang, Z.-J.; Deng, G.-J.; Li, Y.; He, Y.-M.; Tang, W.-J.; Fan, Q.-
H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1243–1246. (b) Li, Z.-W.; Wang, T.-L.; He, Y.-M.; Wang,
Z.-J.; Fan, Q.-H.; Pan, J.; Xu, L.-J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5265–5268. (c) Zhou,
H.-F.; Li, Z.-W.; Wang, Z.-J.; Wang, T.-L.; Xu, L.-J.; He, Y.-M.; Fan, Q.-H.;
Pan, J.; Gu, L.-Q.; Chan, A. S. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8464–8467.
(13) (a) Rueping, M.; Antonchick, A. P.; Theissmann, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3683–3686. (b) Rueping, M.; Theissmann, T.; Antonchick,
A. P. Synlett 2006, 1071–1074. (c) Rueping, M.; Theissmann, T.; Raja, S.; Bats,
J. W. P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1001–1006.
Having established the optimal conditions, we explored the
scope of the Ir-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-benzyl-
substituted quinolines, and the results were summarized in Table
2. The reactions were carried out in toluene at room temperature
under 700 psi of hydrogen. In general, all the quinolines were
hydrogenated completely to give the corresponding 1,2,3,4-
tetrahydroquinolines. Excellent enantioselectivities and high
yields were obtained regardless of the electronic properties and
steric hindrance of substituent groups (Table 2, entries 1-9).
2-Benzyl-6-fluoroquinoline (3g) gave the highest enantioselec-
(14) Guo, Q.-S.; Du, D.-M.; Xu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 759–
762.
(15) (a) Lu, S.-M.; Bolm, C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1101–1105. (b)
Mrsic, N.; Lefort, L.; Boogers, J. A. F.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L.; Vries,
J. G. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1081–1089. (c) Yamagata, T.; Tadaoka, H.;
Nagata, M.; Hirao, T.; Kataoka, Y.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Genet, J. P.;
Mashima, K. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2505–2513. (d) Jahjah, M.; Alame, M.;
Pellet-Rostaing, S.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 2305–2312.
(e) Deport, C.; Buchotte, M.; Abecassis, K.; Tadaoka, H.; Ayad, T.; Ohshima,
T.; Genet, J.-P.; Mashima, K.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V. Synlett 2007, 2743–
2747. (f) Fache, F. Synlett 2004, 2827–2829. (g) Fujita, K.-I.; Kitatsuji, C.;
Furukawa, K.; Yamaguchi, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3215–3217. (h) You,
S.-L. Asian J. Chem. 2007, 2, 820–827.
(16) Niwa, T.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
2643–2645.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 7, 2009 2781