ORGANIC
LETTERS
2010
Vol. 12, No. 20
4516-4519
Convergent Route to the
Spirohexenolide Macrocycle
Brian D. Jones, James J. La Clair, Curtis E. Moore, Arnold L. Rheingold, and
Michael D. Burkart*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UniVersity of California, San Diego,
9500 Gilman DriVe, La Jolla, California 92093-0358
Received August 3, 2010
ABSTRACT
Using key functional dissections, the synthesis of spirohexenolides is examined through a three-component strategy that features a 1,2-
addition to couple tetronate and aldehyde components forming the C2-C3 bond and a Stille coupling to install the third sulfone-containing
component. The macrocycle is completed by an intramolecular Julia-Kocienski reaction to form the C10-C11 trans-disubstituted olefin.
Application of this strategy is described in progress toward the synthesis of (()-spirohexenolide B.
The spirohexenolides A (1a) and B (1b)1 comprise a family
of structurally unique spirotetronate natural products2 isolated
from strains of Streptomyces platensis (Scheme 1).3 Pre-
liminary cytotoxic screening studies indicated that the
spirohexenolides displayed a unique activity in the NCI-60
cell line analysis while maintaining a low toxicity in mice.1
These data combined with a unique uptake and localization
within tumor cells suggested a novel mode of action, which
was recently shown to target the human macrophage migra-
tion inhibitory factor (hMIF).4 Exploratory studies on the
natural material identified only one position, the C8 carbinol,
which could be readily modified and retain activity.4 Efforts
were focused on developing synthetic entry to the class to
perform more complete structure-activity relationship (SAR)
studies for preclinical evaluation.
(1) Kang, M.; Jones, B. D.; Mandel, A. L.; Hammons, J. C.; DiPasquale,
A. G.; Rheingold, A. L.; La Clair, J. J.; Burkart, M. D. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 9054–9061.
Given the comparable activity1,4 of spirohexenolide A (1a),
B (1b), and the corresponding acetate 1c (Scheme 1), our
studies focused on preparation of the putative biosynthetic
deoxy-precursor 1b.
(2) For reviews on the spirotetronate natural products, see: (a) Zografos,
A. L.; Georgiadis, D. Synthesis 2006, 3157–3188. (b) Schobert, R.; Schlenk,
A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 4203–4221. (c) Athanasellis, G.; Igglessi-
Markopoulou, O.; Markopoulos, J. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2010, doi:10.1155/
2010/315056.
A modular strategy was implemented based on dissection
of the molecule into three components: spirotetronate 5,
aldehyde 6, and sulfone 7 (Scheme 1). A four-staged process
was envisoned for their assembly that began by the addition
of the lithium salt of 5 to aldehyde 6.5 The resulting adduct
(3) For other natural products isolated from S. platensis, see: (a)
Hochlowski, J. E.; Whittern, D. N.; Hill, P.; McAlpine, J. B. J. Antibiot.
1994, 47, 870–874. (b) Woo, E. J.; Starks, C. M.; Carney, J. R.; Arslanian,
R.; Cadapan, L.; Zavala, S.; Licari, P. J. Antibiot. 2002, 55, 141–146. (c)
Asai, N.; Kotake, Y.; Niijima, J.; Fukuda, Y.; Uehara, T.; Sakai, T. J.
Antibiot. 2007, 60, 364–369. (d) Kohama, T.; Maeda, H.; Sakai, J. I.;
Shiraishi, A.; Yamashita, K. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 91–94. (e) Furumai, T.;
Eto, K.; Sasaki, T.; Higuchi, H.; Onaka, H.; Saito, N.; Fujita, T.; Naoki,
H.; Igarashi, Y. J. Antibiot. 2002, 55, 873–880. (f) Herath, K. B.; Attygalle,
A. B.; Singh, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15422–15423.
(4) Yu, W.-L.; Jones, B. D.; Kang, M. J.; Hammons, J. C.; La Clair,
J. J.; Burkart, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, submitted.
(5) Franci, X.; Martina, S. L. X.; McGrady, J. E.; Webb, M. R.; Donald,
C.; Taylor, R. J. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7735–7740.
10.1021/ol1018163 2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/17/2010