New Coordination Modes of Dianionic Chelating Ligand for Platinum
75% yield. C32H30O6P2Pt (768): calcd. C 50.04, H 3.94; found C
Table 7. Percentage of growth inhibition of T2 and SKOV3 cells for
7 and cisplatin.
49.82, H 3.86 IR (KBr): ν = 3500–3100 (νOH), 1700 (νC=O), 1620
˜
(νC=C), 1480–1430 (aromatic νC–C) cm–1. 1H NMR (200 MHz,
50 µ 10 µ 2 µ 0.4 µ 0.08 µ 0.016 µ IC50
3
CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 8.0–7.5 (m, 20 H, Ph), 4.49 (d, JH,H = 7.1 Hz,
7 (T2)
Cisplatin (T2)
86.2
90.0
86.4 85.4 0.0
80.0 65.7 22.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
1.2
1 H, 4-H), 3.71 (m, 3 H, 5-H, 6-H), 3.43 (m, 1 H, OH), 2.40 (m, 4
H, dppe) ppm. 31P NMR (81.15 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 32.8
(1JPt,P = 3364, 2JP,P = 9 Hz), 29.2 (1JPt,P = 3664, 2JP,P = 9 Hz) ppm.
7 (SKOV3)
Cisplatin (SKOV3)
84.3
20.9
73.7 18.1 8.5
13.7 8.1 6.7
4.7
6.3
4.7
0.0
6.9
86.2
[Pt(O2,O3-asc)(PTA)2] (3): A 0.2- solution of cis-[Pt(NO3)2-
(PTA)2] was prepared from cis-[PtCl2(PTA)2] (1.85 mmol, 1.07 g)
and AgNO3 (3.7 mmol, 0.62 g) in H2O (20 mL). The mixture was
left to stir for 90 min at 45 °C. AgCl was then filtered with filter
paper, and sodium ascorbate (3.7 mmol, 0.73 g) was added to the
filtrate whilst stirring under nitrogen. The mixture was left to stir
for 24 h at room temperature. 31P NMR inspection of a solution
aliquot showed the complete formation of 5. The pure product was
precipitated with ethanol. Yield 84%. C18H30N6O6P2Pt·3H2O
(737): calcd. C 29.33, H 4.88, N 11.40; found C 29.29, H 4.87, N
Conclusions
In this work, we have shown that ascorbic acid is a versa-
tile ligand for platinum, where the O2, O3, O5, O6 and C2
atoms can act as anionic donating functionalities. Alterna-
tive synthetic routes to known complexes of -ascorbic acid
with platinum(II) have been proposed, and the hydrophi-
licity of O2,O3 complexes has been enhanced by introduc-
ing PTA as a neutral ligand (complex 3). New modes of
coordination of ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid to
platinum(II) have been characterised in solution by NMR
spectroscopy and in the solid state by X-ray crystallography.
The antiproliferative activity in vitro of complexes 1–7 was
tested, and the best results were obtained for the DHA
complex 7, which was found to be more active than cispla-
tin towards both a cisplatin-sensitive and a cisplatin-resist-
ant cell line.
11.37. IR (KBr): ν = 3300 (br. νOH), 1730 (νC=O), 1641 (νC=C) cm–1.
˜
1H NMR (200 MHz, D2O, 25 °C): δ = 4.50 (m, 12 H, NCH2N),
3
2
4.42 (d, JH,H = 2 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.29 (d, JH,P = 13 Hz, 12 H,
3
4
NCH2P), 3.93 (td, JH,H = 7, JH,H = 2 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.65 (dd,
3JH,H = 10.5, 4JH,H = 2 Hz, 2 H, 6-H) ppm. 31P NMR (81.15 MHz,
D2O, 25 °C): δ = –58.34 (1JPt,P = 3302, JP,P = 23.3 Hz), –58.71
2
(1JPt,P = 3343, JP,P = 23.3 Hz) ppm.
2
[Pt(C2,O5-asc){trans-(R,R-dach)}] (4): [Pt{trans-(R,R-dach)}I2]
(1.5 g, 2.6 mmol) was placed in water (13 mL), and a second solu-
tion containing AgNO3 (0.88 g, 5.2 mmol) in H2O (13.3 mL) was
added. The mixture was left to stir for 90 min at 45 °C, and the
precipitate of AgI was then removed by filtration with filter paper.
The clear filtrate, containing the aqua-species [Pt{trans-(R,R-
dach)}(OH2)2](NO3)2, was degassed and kept under nitrogen, and
then sodium ascorbate (1.02 g, 5.2 mmol) was added. The mixture
was left to stir for 24 h at room temperature, and then at 4 °C
overnight. Crystals slowly formed, which were collected, and fil-
tered with filter paper. Yield 46%. C12H20N2O6Pt·3H2O (537):
calcd. C 26.81, H 4.88, N 5.21; found C 26.45, H 4.75, N 5.27. IR
Experimental Section
[11]
PTA
as well as the Pt complexes [Pt(CO3)(PPh3)2],[9] [Pt(CO3)-
(dppe)],[9] cis-[PtCl2(PTA)2][11] and [Pt{trans-(R,R-dach)}I2][13] were
prepared as reported. All the other chemicals and solvents were
used as purchased (reagent grade). Elemental analyses (C, H, N)
were performed by using a Carlo Erba instrument model EA1110.
FT-IR spectra were recorded with a Nicolet 510P FT-IR instru-
ment (4000–300 cm–1). NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker
AM spectrometer: 200 MHz (1H NMR), 81.15 MHz (31P NMR).
Peak positions are relative to tetramethylsilane and were calibrated
against the residual solvent resonance (1H) and measured relative
to external 85% H3PO4 with downfield values taken as positive
(31P).
(KBr): ν = 3550–2860 (νOH), 1716 (νC=O), 1630 and 1590 (νC=C
)
˜
cm–1. 1H NMR (200 MHz, D2O, 25 °C): δ = 4.27 (s, 1 H, 4-H),
1
1
4.08 (t, JH,H = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.42 (d, JH,H = 6.5 Hz, 2 H, 6-
H), 2.32, 1.91, 1.50, 1.10 (m, 10 H, dach) ppm.
[Pt(O5,O6-(O2,O3dibenz)-asc)(PPh3)2] (5): The carbonate complex
[Pt(CO3)(PPh3)2] (0.15 g, 0.19 mmol) was dissolved in dichloro-
methane (25 mL). To this solution dibenzyl ascorbic acid (68 mg,
0.19 mmol) was added, and the mixture was left overnight whilst
stirring. It was then concentrated to dryness, and the solid residue
was washed with diethyl ether to give pure 5 (0.113 g, 0.12 mmol,
63% yield). C56H48O6P2Pt (1073): calcd. C 62.62, H 4.47; found C
Synthesis and Characterisation of Complexes 1–7
62.61, H 4.40. IR (nujol): ν = 1754 and 1667 (νC=O) cm–1. 1H NMR
[Pt(O2,O3-asc)(PPh3)2] (1): The carbonate complex [Pt(CO3)-
(PPh3)2] (0.15 g, 0.19 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane sat-
urated with water (25 mL), and -ascorbic acid (0.034 g,
0.19 mmol) was added. The solution was left to stir whilst shielded
from light for 18 h. It was then concentrated to dryness, and the
solid residue was washed with diethyl ether to give 1 (0.14 g,
0.15 mmol, yield 81%). C42H36O6P2Pt (894): calcd. C 56.37, H
˜
(200 MHz, C3D6O, 25 °C): δ = 7.5–8.0 (m, 40 H, Ph), 5.25 (d, 2JH,H
2
= 12 Hz,1 H, PhCH2), 5.12 (d, JH,H = 12 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.75
2
2
(d, JH,H = 11 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.65 (d, JH,H = 11 Hz, 1 H,
3
PhCH2), 4.38 (d, JH,H = 11 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.26 (m, 1 H, 5-H),
4.04 (m, 1 H, 6-H), 3.64 (m, 1 H, 6Ј-H) ppm. 31P NMR
(81.15 MHz, C3H6O, 25 °C): δ = 13.7 (1JPt,P = 3512, JP,P
=
2
21.4 Hz), 12.8 (1JPt,P = 3372, JP,P = 21.4 Hz) ppm.
2
4.03; found C 56.25, H 4.01. IR (KBr): ν = 3500–3100 (νOH), 1780–
˜
1630 (νC=O + νC=C), 1480–1430 (aromatic νC···C) cm–1. 1H NMR
[Pt(dppe)(O5,O6-(O2,O3dibenz)-asc)] (6): The preparation of com-
plex 6 was carried out in the same manner as that for complex 5.
Yield 75%. C46H42O6P2Pt (948): calcd. C 58.22, H 4.43; found C
2
(200 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 7.5–7 (m, 30 H, Ph), 4.30 (d, JH,H
= 7.6 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.60 (m, 1 H, 5-H), 3.30 (m, 2 H, 6-H) ppm.
31P NMR (81.15 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 9.7 (1JPt,P = 3490, JP,P
2
58.21, H 4.45. IR (nujol): ν = 3500–2800 (νOH), 1754 (νC=O), 1670
˜
= 20 Hz), 6.9 (1JPt,P = 3776, JP,P = 20 Hz) ppm.
2
(νC=C), 1480–1430 (νC–C aromatic) cm–1. 1H NMR (200 MHz,
2
[Pt(dppe)(O2,O3-asc)] (2): Complex 2 was prepared in the same
way as complex 1 from the corresponding carbonate precursor in
C3D6O, 25 °C): δ = 8.25 and 7.35 (2m, 30 H, Ph), 5.39 (d, JH,H
=
2
12 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 5.22 (d, JH,H = 12 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.77
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 529–537
© 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
535