ˇ
I. Sosic et al. / Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
4
EDC-mediated coupling of 41 with aminoacetonitrile hydrochlo-
ride. To prepare a series of 8-(hetero)aryl substituted quinolines
46–67, an efficient methodology was developed by the Štefane
group.34 Compounds 46–59 were synthesized by Pd-catalyzed cou-
pling of organoboron reagents with 8-bromo-5-nitroquinoline
(45),34 whereas derivatives 60–67 were prepared by an original
one-pot sequential Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling/direct CAH ary-
lation reaction (Scheme 1: rectangle D). This methodology enabled
rapid access to a variety of polysubstituted molecular architectures
at position 8 of the quinoline ring.
The biochemical evaluation of the synthesized compounds was
initiated with the determination of their relative inhibition of catB
endopeptidase and exopeptidase activities, using the catB specific
substrates Z-Arg-Arg-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin (Z-Arg-Arg-
AMC) and 2-aminobenzoyl (Abz)-Gly-Ile-Val-Arg-Ala-Lys(Dnp)A
OH, respectively (results not shown). The compounds that showed
two compounds showed similar constants of inhibition for both
catB activities as were determined for nitroxoline (Table S2 and
Fig. S1). The nitrile-containing compounds 20–24 were poor inhi-
bitors of both catB activities, with only compound 22 showing
improved inhibition (endopeptidase activity: Ki0 = 34 1 mM;
exopeptidase activity: Ki = 156 48 mM, Ki0 = 18 5 mM, Table 1)
in comparison with nitroxoline.
Unsurprisingly, the majority of compounds from the truncated
series inhibited both catB activities poorly (Table S3), which indi-
cates that both rings are needed for efficient binding into the active
site of catB. Compounds 27 and 37 (Table S3) did, however, inhibit
the exopeptidase activity with Ki values below 100 mM rendering
these two molecules as interesting catB-inhibiting fragments.
In a previous study,30 we showed that 4-methylpiperidine moi-
ety attached at position 8 of the 5-nitroquinoline ring, results in
increased exopeptidase activity inhibition in comparison with
nitroxoline. Interestingly, the 8-substituted derivatives presented
herein showed a particularly weak or even absence of inhibition
of catB (Table S4). Only compounds 61 and 66 are of interest from
this series, as they showed uncompetitive inhibition of both catB
activities in the low micromolar range (Table 1). It is important
to note here that the SARs of compounds 60–63 (Table S4) seem
flat, because very small structural changes led to significant
decrease in inhibitory activities.
Addition of an NO2 group at position 7 of 15 (compound S1,
Table S5) resulted in a loss of catB inhibitory activity, whereas
there were no significant differences in inhibitory properties
between compound 16 and its 5,7-dinitro analogue S2 (Tables 1
and S5). The most potent dinitro nitroxoline derivative was com-
pound S5, with a Ki0 of 9 1 mM for endopeptidase activity and Ki
and Ki0 of 154 23 mM and 35 12 mM, respectively, for exopepti-
dase activity (Table 1).
Recently, it was shown that the pH value of the assay buffer
plays a more important role in the measurement of inhibitory
activities in comparison with the choice of the substrate, i.e., the
latter did not strongly affect the equilibrium between the
endopeptidase (open) or exopeptidase (closed) form of catB.22 To
address the effect of pH on the inhibitory activity and to shift the
equilibrium of catB to the closed conformation, we assayed the
compounds from Table 1 using the ‘small’ endopeptidase substrate
Z-Arg-Arg-AMC at pH 4.5 (Table S6). Given the fact that com-
pounds presented in Table 1 are small in size (with exceptions of
9 and 10), we were expecting improvements in inhibitory activities
as a result of the proximity of histidines in the occluding loop
(where the NO2 group of inhibitors binds28) and other enzyme’s
binding subsites. In contrast to our expectations and for reasons
currently unknown, all inhibitors exhibited higher Ki values under
acidic assay conditions. The most striking difference was observed
for compounds 9 and 10, which showed a 30-fold reduction in Ki
values (9: 8.2 mM at pH 6 versus 237 mM at pH 4.5; 10: 12.0 mM
at pH 6 versus 322 mM at pH 4.5; Table S6).
relative inhibitions similar to nitroxoline or better at 50 lM
(endopeptidase activity, 21.9% 3.3%; exopeptidase activity,
24.7% 2.8%, Fig. 1) were further characterized by determining
their kinetic parameters and their mode of inhibition. In Table 1,
a selection of the most potent derivatives with characterized mode
of inhibition is represented; whereas the assay results for all other
compounds are shown in the Supplementary data (Tables S1–S5).
Ki values represent inhibition constants for the dissociation of
the enzyme-inhibitor complex, whereas the Ki0 values are inhibi-
tion constants for the dissociation of the enzyme-substrate-inhibi-
tor complex.
Based on the data given in Tables 1 and in S1–S5, the structural
features needed for inhibition can be deduced. In order not to over-
interpret the SAR data, only the important findings are empha-
sized. Most of the 7-carboxamide derivatives 2–14 that showed
catB inhibitory activity were either uncompetitive inhibitors of
catB endopeptidase activity or showed mixed type of inhibition
with a predominantly uncompetitive component. Very similar data
was obtained when Abz-Gly-Ile-Val-Arg-Ala-Lys(Dnp)AOH was
used as a substrate and the influence on the exopeptidase activity
of catB was addressed, as these compounds showed the same
mode of inhibition and in the same concentration range (Tables 1
and S1). In comparison with their 7-aminomethylated counter-
parts,28,30 compounds 2–4 showed very similar inhibitory proper-
ties, whereas compounds 5–8 showed 2–10-fold decrease in
inhibition of the catB endopeptidase activity. Compound 7, on
the other hand, proved to be a better exopeptidase activity inhibi-
tor than its aminomethylated analogue (Ki = 426 39
constant of inhibition in the low micromolar range (Ki = 128 21
M, Ki0 = 30 10
M, Table 1). The assay results for compounds
l
M30) with
l
l
5–8 are indicating that the interaction of their mildly electrophilic
amidoacetonitrile warhead with the catalytic cysteine did not take
place, as the literature data show that the Ki values are substan-
tially lower when the covalent interaction occurs.23 The most
promising compounds from this series proved to be compounds
9 and 10 with a larger side chain comprised of 1,3-substituted
piperidine core at position 7 (Table 1). When using Z-Arg-Arg-
AMC as a substrate, compounds 9 and 10 acted as uncompetitive
Our next step was to explore the effects of selected inhibitors (6–
10, 15, and S5) on the proteolysis of the ECM and tumor cell inva-
sion in vitro. CatB is substantially involved in the progression of can-
cer, as it was shown that extracellular and intracellular catB
activities contribute substantially to the turnover of ECM.8,11,35 To
investigate the impact of inhibitors on ECM degradation, we evalu-
ated their effects on the degradation of DQ-collagen IV by MCF-10A
neoT cells. Collagen type IV is a major constituent of the ECM that
can be fluorescently tagged and gives after enzymatic cleavage
bright green fluorescence. Moreover, we have shown previously
that MCF-10A neoT cells degrade DQ-collagen IV inside cells and
extracellularly.29 To quantify the extracellular and intracellular
degradation of the DQ-collagen IV, spectrofluorimetry and flow
cytometry were employed (Fig. 3). Compounds 6 (5 mM), 9 (1.25
mM), and 10 (1.25 mM) showed the most potent reduction of the
inhibitors of catB, with Ki0 of 8
0
l
M and 12
1 lM, respectively.
In addition, both compounds inhibited exopeptidase activity of
catB with the same potency and in the same mode (9: Ki0 = 13
0
l
M, 10: Ki0 = 18
2 lM; Table 1). Interestingly, when we intro-
duced the 2,3-dihydro-1H-indene (compound 11) instead of the
benzoxazole (9) or benzothiazole (10) on the piperidine nitrogen,
no inhibition was observed. The same occurred when the methy-
lene group was inserted between the piperidine and aromatic
bicyclic system (compounds 12–14, Table S1).
Small substituents at position 2 led to diminished inhibitory
activity in comparison with nitroxoline, except for compounds 15
and 16 with Me and CN moiety, respectively, at position 2. These
ˇ