the complexes was observed (Supporting informationw).
90Y-C-DOTA and 177Lu-C-DOTA were quite stable in serum
over the time period of measurements by ITLC and HPLC
(Supporting informationw). However, both 90Y-C-DOTA and
177Lu-C-DOTA in serum produced an unbound 90Y or
177Lu-related impurity that appeared as a very small peak in
radio SE-HPLC chromatograms (tR = B14 min).
In summary, the new bifunctional ligand was efficiently
prepared by the new synthetic method centered on the regio-
specific ring opening of the aziridinium ion. Radiolabeling of
3p-C-NETA with 90Y or 177Lu was found to be highly efficient
under mild conditions. 90Y-3p-C-NETA and 177Lu-3p-C-NETA
were stable in serum for at least 14 days. The radiolabeling kinetics
and in vitro serum stability data suggest that 3p-C-NETA is a very
promising bifunctional ligand that can be directly used for RIT
applications of various cancers and may overcome the limitations
associated with the currently available ligands C-DOTA and
C-DTPA for RIT. 3p-C-NETA conjugated to an antibody is being
investigated for RIT applications of a or b-emitting radioisotopes.
We appreciate the financial support from the National
Institutes of Health (R01CA112503). Hyun A Song is the
recipient of 2008 and 2009 IIT Kilpatrick fellowship.
Scheme 3 Structural determination of 13 for confirmation of regio-
chemistry in ring opening of 9.
compared to that of C-DOTA (Table 1 and the Supporting
Informationw). 3p-C-NETA instantly formed a complex with
90Y at pH 5.5 with the excellent radiolabeling efficiency (97.4 ꢀ
0.7%) in 1 min (Table 1). Radiolabeling of 3p-C-NETA with
177Lu was essentially complete in 1 min at all the range of pH
studied. C-DOTA was significantly slower in binding 90Y at pH
5.5 (83.5 ꢀ 8.13%, 1 h) relative to 3p-C-NETA, and radio-
labeling of C-DOTA with 90Y was incomplete even at 1 h time
point. Formation of 177Lu-C-DOTA was relatively faster than
that of 90Y-C-DOTA at all the range of pH. In vitro serum
stability of the radiolabeled complexes was performed to
determine if 3p-C-NETA or C-DOTA radiolabeled with 90Y
or 177Lu remained stable without loss of 90Y or 177Lu in human
serum ITLC and radio size-exclusion HPLC (Supporting
Informationw). 90Y-3p-C-NETA and 177Lu-3p-C-NETA were
readily prepared from the reactions of 3p-C-NETA with 90Y or
177Lu at room temperature and directly used for serum stability
studies. C-DOTA is reported to form less stable intermediate
metal complexes with Lanthanides under mild reaction condi-
tion based on a three step complexation mechanism.16 To
ensure complete radiolabeling and formation of the most stable
complexes of C-DOTA, 90Y-C-DOTA and 177Lu-C-DOTA
were prepared by the reaction of C-DOTA with 90Y or 177Lu
at either room temperature (177Lu) or 37 1C (90Y) over an
extended period of time. Radiolabeling of C-DOTA with 90Y
was determined to be incomplete even at 30 h time point by
SE-HPLC. 90Y-C-DOTA was separated from a small amount
of unbound 90Y present in the reaction mixture through a
Chelex-100 column. 177Lu-3p-C-NETA, 90Y-3p-C-NETA, and
177Lu-C-DOTA were used without further purification. Both
90Y-3p-C-NETA and 177Lu-3p-C-NETA were stable in human
serum for 2 weeks as evidenced by SE-HPLC and ITLC
analysis, and no measurable radioactivity dissociated from
Notes and references
1 S. J. Knox and R. F. Meredith, Semin. Radiat. Oncol., 2000, 10, 73–93.
2 M. R. McDevitt, D. Ma, L. T. Lai, J. Simon, P. Borchardt,
R. K. Frank, K. Wu, V. Pellegrini, M. J. Curcio, M. Miederer,
N. H. Bander and D. A. Scheinberg, Science, 2001, 294, 1537–1540.
3 S. Srivastava and E. Dadachova, Semin. Nucl. Med., 2001, 31, 330–341.
4 D. E. Milenic, E. D. Brady and M. W. Brechbiel, Nat. Rev.
Drug Discovery, 2004, 3, 488–499.
5 (a) S. J. Knox, M. L. Goris, K. Trisler, R. Negrin, T. Davis,
T. M. Liles, A. J. Grillo-Lopez, P. Chinn, C. Varns, S. C. Ning,
S. Fowler, N. Deb, M. Becker, C. Marquez and R. Levy, Clin.
Cancer Res., 1996, 2, 457–470.
6 (a) D. Parker, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1990, 19, 271–291;
(b) M. C. Chakrabarti, N. Le, C. H. Paik, W. G. De Graff and
J. A. Carrasquillo, J. Nucl. Med., 1996, 37, 1384–1388.
7 (a) M. K. Moi, C. F. Meares and S. J. DeNardo, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1988, 110, 6266–7; (b) M. Kodama, T. Koike, A. B. Mahatma
and E. Kimura, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 1270–1273.
8 (a) J. B. Stimmel, M. E. Stockstill and F. C. Kull, Jr., Bioconjugate
Chem., 1995, 6, 219–225; (b) L. L. Chappell, D. Ma, D. E. Milenic,
K. Garmasteni, V. Venditto, M. P. Beitzel and M. W. Brechbiel,
Nucl. Med. Biol., 2003, 30, 581–595.
9 S. Hassfjell and M. W. Brechbiel, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 2019–36.
10 (a) M. W. Brechbiel and O. A. Gansow, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1992, 1173–8; (b) L. Camera, S. Kinuya, K. Garmestani,
C. Wu, M. W. Brechbiel, L. H. Pai, T. J. McMurry, O. A. Gansow,
I. Pastan, C. H. Paik and J. A. Carrasquillo, J. Nucl. Med., 1994,
35, 882–889; (c) M. J. Blend, J. J. Stastny, S. M. Swanson and
M. W. Brechbiel, Cancer Biother. Radiopharm., 2003, 18, 355–63;
(d) H. Kobayashi, C. Wu, T. M. Yoo, B. F. Sun, D. Drumm,
I. Pastan, C. H. Paik, O. A. Gansow, J. A. Carrasquillo and
M. W. Brechbiel, J. Nucl. Med., 1998, 39, 829–36.
Table 1 Radiolabling efficiency (%) of 3p-C-NETA or C-DOTA
with 90Y or 177Lu (RT, 0.25M NH4OAC, pH 5.5)a
11 H. S. Chong, K. Garmestani, D. E. Millenic and M. W. Brechbiel,
J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45, 3458–3464.
12 H. S. Chong, D. E. Milenic, K. Garmestani, E. D. Brady, H. Arora,
D. Pfiester and M. W. Brechbiel, Nucl. Med. Biol., 2006, 33, 459.
13 H. S. Chong, H. A. Song, N. Birch, T. Le, S. Lim and X. Ma.
Bioorg, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, 18, 3436–39.
14 H. S. Chong, H. A. Song, M. Dadwal, X. Sun, I. Sin and Y. Chen,
J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 219–21 and 7966.
15 R. L. Blankespoor, T. DeVries, E. Hansen, J. M. Kallemeyn,
A. M. Klooster, J. A. Mulder and R. P. D. A. Vander Griend,
J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 2677–2681.
3p-C-NETA
Time (min) 90Y
C-DOTA
177Lu
90Y
177Lu
1
5
10
20
30
60
97.4 ꢀ 0.7 100.0 ꢀ 0.0 77.1 ꢀ 3.7
98.1 ꢀ 1.1 100.0 ꢀ 0.0 78.8 ꢀ 5.1
94.5 ꢀ 3.9
98.8 ꢀ 1.1
98.7 ꢀ 1.6 100.0 ꢀ 0.0 69.4 ꢀ 10.6 99.5 ꢀ 0.5
98.7 ꢀ 2.2 100.0 ꢀ 0.0 71.2 ꢀ 11.2 99.9 ꢀ 0.1
99.4 ꢀ 0.9 100.0 ꢀ 0.0 76.1 ꢀ 9.52 99.9 ꢀ 0.1
99.5 ꢀ 1.0 100.0 ꢀ 0.0 83.5 ꢀ 8.13 100.0 ꢀ 0.0
a
ITLC (CH3CN : H2O = 3 : 2); Radiolabeling efficiency (mean ꢀ
16 J. Moreau, E. Guillion, J.-C. Pierrard, J. Rimbault, M. Port and
M. Aplincourt, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 5218–32.
standard deviation %) was measured in triplicate (n = 3).
c
5586 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5584–5586
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011