9084
J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9084-9085
focused on chemo-, regio-, and enantioselectivity.5-7 The
proposed mechanisms of enzyme-catalyzed nitrile hy-
drolysis has been discussed, and several species of
microorganisms have been identified to possess this
activity.8 In this paper we describe our initial efforts to
extend microbial hydrolysis of nitriles to substrates
containing a hydroxyl group in the 4- and 5-position of
the substrate such that a γ-butyrolactone or δ-valerolac-
tone is formed from the presumed hydroxy acid inter-
mediate.
Con ver sion of Hyd r oxy Nitr iles to La cton es
Usin g Rh od ococcu s r h od och r ou s Wh ole
Cells
Stephen K. Taylor,*,† Nikolas H. Chmiel,
Lloyd J . Simons, and J ames R. Vyvyan†
Department of Chemistry, Hope College,
Holland, Michigan 49422-9000
R. rhodochrous IFO 155649 was incubated at 30 °C in
a culture medium containing glycerol as a carbon source
and ꢀ-caprolactam as the source of nitrogen blending the
methods of Ohta5a and Mayaux.10 The harvested wet
cells were suspended in a phosphate buffer, the hydroxy
nitrile substrate 111,12 was introduced, and the reaction
was monitored by TLC. After workup, the products were
purified by chromatography on silica and characterized
by GC, IR, NMR, and chiral GC.13 Compounds 2a ,4a 2b,4a
2c,2a,14 2d ,2a,14 2e,15 2f,16 2g,17 2h ,18 and 2i4a have been
reported, and their identity was confirmed by comparison
with authentic standards and/or literature data.
As illustrated in Table 1, microbial hydrolysis of the
hydroxy nitriles 1 provides good yields of lactones 2.19
Younger, actively growing cell cultures (2-3 days) gave
modest enantioselectivity in the formation of 2 (Table 1,
entries 1 and 2), but at the expense of the chemical yield.
In these experiments a low mass recovery of crude
material was obtained, possibly as a result of further
metabolism of the substrate by the microbe. Older,
resting cells (6-10 days) provided very good yields of the
various lactones 2, although with little or no enantiose-
lectivity (Table 1, entries 3-8). Occasionally, traces of
an amide were seen in the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude
product mixture from the hydrolysis of 1a ,20 but this was
not consistently reproducible, and similar evidence of
Received August 29, 1996
Nitriles are one of the most synthetically versatile
functional groups in organic synthesis. Their ease of
preparation from varied precursors and their subsequent
reactions, particularly those of their enolates, allow rapid
assembly of structurally and stereochemically complex
compounds.1 Moreover, γ-butyro- and δ-valerolactones
are prominent moieties in biologically active compounds.
They are components of natural flavors and odors,
pheromones of several species of insects, and intermedi-
ates in the synthesis of natural products.2 Hydrolysis of
4- and 5-hydroxy nitriles and subsequent lactonization
of an intermediate hydroxy acid would seem an attrac-
tive, general route to these important molecules (eq 1).
Unfortunately, chemical conversion of a nitrile to its
corresponding carboxylic acid is often difficult, requiring
harsh conditions of concentrated acid or base and ex-
tended reaction times at elevated temperature.3 Such
vigorous conditions are not desirable for the preparation
of structurally elaborate and/or sensitive substrates.
Therefore, the hydrolysis of a hydroxynitrile to the
corresponding lactone by way of the intermediate hydroxy
acid has not been a transformation of choice for the
construction of substituted lactones.4 Herein we report
our preliminary results in the facile microbial hydrolysis
and lactonization of hydroxynitriles using Rhodococcus
rhodochrous whole cells. This high-yielding transforma-
tion takes place at pH 6 in a matter of minutes at 30 °C.
This method paves the way to a milder general prepara-
tion of substituted lactones from nitrile precursors.
Several reports of microbial hydrolysis of nitriles to
either their corresponding amides or carboxylic acids
have appeared recently, and many of the studies have
(5) Sugai, T.; Katoh, O.; Ohta, H. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 11987 and
references cited therein.
(6) Crosby, J .; Moilliet, J .; Parratt, J . S.; Turner, N. J . J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 1679 and references cited therein.
(7) (a) de Raadt, A.; Klempier, N.; Faber, K.; Griengl, H. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 137. (b) Gradley, M. L.; Deverson, C. J . F.;
Knowles, C. J . Arch. Microbiol. 1994, 161, 246. (c) Layh, N.; Stolz, A.;
Bo¨hme, J .; Effenberger, F.; Knackmuss, H.-J . J . Biotechnol. 1994, 33,
175. (d) Bauer, R.; Hirrlinger, B.; Layh, N.; Stolz, A.; Knackmuss, H.-
J . Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 42,1 and references cited in the
above works.
(8) Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.;
Springer-Verlag: New York, 1995; Chapter 2, pp 124-133 and
references therein.
(9) Purchased from Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (IFO), 17-85
J uso-honmachi 2-chome, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532, J apan.
(10) Mayaux, J .-F.; Cerbelaud, E.; Soubrier, F.; Yeh, P.; Blanche,
F.; Pe´tre´, D. J . Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 6694.
(11) Substrates 1a -h were prepared by opening the appropriate
epoxide with lithioacetonitrile. Preparation of these and other hydroxy
nitriles by this method, including examination of the diastereoselec-
tivity of this reaction will be described elsewhere. Compound 1i was
prepared by NaBH4 reduction of commercially available 5-oxo-
hexanenitrile.
(12) Larcheveque, M.; Debal, A. Synth. Commun. 1980, 10, 49.
(13) See Supporting Information for typical experimental procedure.
(14) De´ziel, R.; Malenfant, E. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4660.
(15) Heiba, E. I.; Dessau, R. M.; Rodewald, P. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96, 7977.
† Camille and Henry Dreyfus Scholar/Fellow 1995-1997.
(1) (a) The Chemistry of the Cyano Group; Rappoport, Z., Ed.;
Interscience: New York, 1970. (b) Arseniyadis, S.; Kyler, K. S.; Watt,
D. S. In Organic Reactions; Dauben, W. G., Ed.; Wiley: New York,
1984; Vol. 31, Chapter 1.
(2) (a) Brown, H. C.; Kulkarni, S. V.; Racherla, U. S. J . Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 365. (b) Lin, G.-Q.; Xu, W.-C. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5907.
(c) Enders, D.; Knopp, M. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5805. (d) Marson, C.
M.; Randall, L.; Winter, M. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6717. (e)
Baskaran, S.; Islam, I.; Chandrasekaran, S. J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
891. (f) Utaka, M.; Watabu, H.; Takeda, A. J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
4363. (g) Cardellach, J .; Font, J .; Ortun˜o, R. M. J . Heterocycl. Chem.
1984, 21, 327 and references cited in the above works.
(3) For representative examples see: (a) Prout, F. S.; Hartman, R.
J .; Huang, E. P.-Y.; Korpics, C. J .; Tichelaar, G. R. Organic Syntheses;
Wiley: New York, 1963; Collect. Vol. IV, p 93. (b) Allen, C. F. H.;
J ohnson, H. B. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1963; Collect.
Vol. IV, p 804. (c) McGuire, M. A.; Sorenson, E.; Owings, F. W.; Resnick,
T. M.; Fox, M.; Baine, N. H. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6683.
(4) For representative examples of this transformation, see: (a)
Gopalan, A.; Lucero, R.; J acobs, H.; Berryman, K. Synth. Commun.
1991, 21, 1321. (b) Matsuda, I.; Murata, S.; Ishii, Y. J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 26.
(16) Mattes, H.; Benezra, C. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2732.
(17) Chattopadhyay, S.; Mamdapur, V. R.; Chadha, M. S. Tetrahe-
dron 1990, 46, 3667.
(18) Alonso, D.; Font, J .; Ortun˜o, R. M. J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5567.
(19) As a control, substrate 1a was placed in the pH 6 buffer at 30
°C for 18 h. No 2a was detected by TLC or GC, and 1a was recovered
quantitatively.
(20) Determined by comparison to the 1H NMR spectrum of 4-hy-
droxyhexanamide (3), which was prepared by partial chemical hy-
drolysis of 1a using the method of Rao: Rao, C. G. Synth. Commun.
1982, 12, 177.
S0022-3263(96)01662-3 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society