application of chiral ligands with phosphines (or other easily
oxidizable species with high lying lone-pair orbitals), which
may dissociate from palladium under the catalytic process,
is strongly limited; and (ii) immobilization of palladium
catalysts requiring firm multidentate ligation is encumbered
by the easy oxidation of the applied ligand. To solve these
issues in Pd(II)/Pd(IV) chemistry, the application of pincer
complex (such as 1a-c, eq 1) catalysts4 offers a highly
attractive approach. Although similar ideas emerged over a
decade ago,4a,b,5a-c there has been an intensive debate on
the possibilities of generating Pd(IV) intermediates, when
pincer complexes are employed as direct catalysts. Several
studies5a-c indicate that aryl iodides are probably not
sufficiently reactive to maintain a Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic
cycle based on pincer complexes.
Table 1. Pd-Catalyzed Coupling of Alkenes with Iodonium
Saltsa
Interestingly, however, van Koten6a and Canty6b have
shown that NCN complexes, such as 1b, undergo stoichio-
metric oxidative addition with iodonium salts3 affording
Pd(IV) pincer complexes (eq 2). We have now found that
palladium pincer complexes 1a,b can be employed as highly
active catalysts in Heck-type redox7 reactions of easily
available3b aryl-iodonium salts 2a-e with functionalized
alkenes (3a-k) in the presence of NaHCO3 in THF/CH3CN
(eq 1, Table 1).
The 31P NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture (see
Supporting Information) indicated that the pincer structure
of 1a remained intact after full conversion of the substrates.
A further confirmation that the pincer complex is the direct
catalyst of the reaction5a-c arises from the negative mercury-
drop test.5d When the reaction (entry 1) was conducted in
the presence of 150 equiv (per Pd) of elemental Hg, catalyst
poisoning was not observed, and the isolated yield was
identical to the yield of the corresponding process conducted
(3) (a) Zhdankin, V. V.; Stang, P. J. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 5299. (b)
Bielawski, M.; Zhu, M.; Olofsson, B. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2610.
(4) (a) Albrecht, M.; v. Koten, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
3750. (b) v. d. Boom, M. E.; Milstein, D. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1759. (c)
Szabo´, K. J. Synlett 2006, 811. (d) Benito-Garagorri, D.; Kirchner, K. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 201.
(5) (a) Sommer, W. J.; Yu, K.; Sears, J. S.; Ji, Y.; Zheng, X.; Davis,
R. J.; Sherrill, C. D.; Jones, C. W.; Weck, M. Organometallics 2005, 24,
4351. (b) Eberhard, M. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2125. (c) Phan, N. T. S.; v.
d. Sluys, M.; Jones, C. W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 609. (d) Anton,
D. R.; Crabtree, R. H. Organometallics 1983, 2, 855.
(6) (a) Lagunas, M.-C.; Gossage, R. A.; Spek, A. L.; v. Koten, G.
Organometallics 1998, 17, 731. (b) Canty, A. J.; Rodemann, T.; Skelton,
B. W.; White, A. H. Organometallics 2006, 25, 3996.
(7) (a) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3009.
(b) Moriarty, R. M.; Epa, W. R.; Awasthi, A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 6315. (c) Zhu, M.; Song, Y.; Cao, Y. Synthesis 2007, 853. (d) Kang,
S.-K.; Lee, H.-W.; Jang, S.-B.; Kim, T.-H.; Pyun, S.-J. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 2604. (e) Pan, D.; Chen, A.; Su, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, S.; Jia, W.; Xiao, J.;
Liu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Jiao, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4729. (f)
Ohff, M.; Ohff, A.; Milstein, D. Chem. Commun. 1999, 357. (g) Kurihara,
J.; Sodboka, M.; Shibasaki, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 2357. (h)
Liang, Y.; Luo, S.; Liu, C.; Wu, X.; Ma, Y. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2961.
(i) Sugioka, K; Uchiyama, M.; Suzuki, T.; Yamazaki, Y. Nippon Kagaku
Kaishi 1985, 527.
a Unless otherwise stated, 3 (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), NaHCO3 (0.2
mmol), and catalyst 1a,b,d (5 mol %) were dissolved in THF (A) or CH3CN
(B) (0.3 mL) and stirred at 50 °C. b Solvent. c Isolated yield. d Isolated yield
in the presence of 150 equiv of Hg. e 0.4 mmol of 3e was used. f Performed
at 65 °C.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2853