2932 Organometallics, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2009
Communications
Scheme 1. Preparation and Reactions of Complex 1
observed in mass spectra of gold(I) compounds. The proposed
structure of complex 1 was confirmed by an X-ray diffraction
study (Figure 1).36
The complex crystallizes in the space group P21/n and
contains three independent molecules of 1 in the unit cell. Each
molecule of 1 consists of a pair of gold atoms bridged by a
2-
C10H6 group and a molecule of Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2. The coor-
dination geometry about gold is almost linear, with C-Au-P
angles ranging from 169.60(16) to 175.22(19)°. The Au · · · Au
distances range from 2.8868(3) to 2.9239(3) Å, which are greater
than those found in the eight-membered gold(I) dimers [Au2(µ-
2-C6H4PPh2)2] (Au · · · Au ) 2.8594(3) Å)27 and [Au2(µ-C6H3-
2-PPh2-6-Me)2] (Au · · · Au ) 2.861(2) Å)27 but less than those
of the ten-membered gold(I) dimer [Au2(µ-2-C6H4CH2PPh2)2]
(Au · · · Au ) 3.0035(9) Å).28 The average Au-P and Au-C
distances in 1 (2.293(5) and 2.060(5) Å) are similar to those
observed in other organometallic gold(I) phosphine complexes.
In general, there is good agreement of all equivalent bond
lengths among the three molecules. Tables S1 and S2 (Sup-
porting Information) show a comparison and statistical analysis
of selected equivalent bonds. The highest degree of conservation
is observed for the naphthyl rings. These exhibit only slight
twisting (atoms deviate between 0.003 and 0.097 Å from the
least-squares planes), and the sum of the bond angles surround-
ing the carbon atom to which the gold atoms are attached falls
into the narrow range between 359.2(9) and 360.0(9)°. The
largest variance is observed for the Au · · · Au distance, which
correlates with the C′-C-Au angle, with C′ being the bridging
carbon atom of the naphthyl ring. The dihedral angles of the
ethyl bridge of the chelating phosphine ligands deviate sub-
stantially from a gauche conformation; however, the resulting
P · · · P distance does not correlate with the corresponding
dihedral angle. Instead, the C-C-P bond angles also deviate
from the ideal 109.5°. This flexibility of some parts of the
molecule (most likely crystal-packing effects will contribute
significantly to the conformation of the dppe ligand) result in a
twisting of the whole molecule expressed through the dihedral
angle between the intramolecular C-Au-P vectors. This angle
varies between 6.3° for the almost planar molecule (Au1 and
Au2) and 28.6° (Au5 and Au6).
dinuclear gold(I) complexes that has hitherto been unknown
consists of derivatives of the type [Au2(µ-C-C)(µ-E-E)], where
C-C represents a dianionic carbon-only ligand and E-E a neutral,
bidentate ligand. Given the required geometry and bite angle
to bridge two metal atoms, the 1,8-naphthalenediyl dianion,
C10H62-, seemed a suitable choice for our purpose. Indeed, there
2-
are prior examples of metal compounds in which 1,8-C10H6
adopts a bridging coordination mode. These include derivatives
of Li,19 Mg,20 Ge,21 Sn,22 Ga,23 and Hg.24,25 In the mercury
derivative [Hg2(µ-C10H6)2],24 the two Hg atoms are held 2.797(1)
Å apart, a distance which is close to that typically also observed
in binuclear gold complexes. We therefore attempted to prepare
the binuclear gold(I) complex [Au2(µ-C10H6){µ-Ph2P-
(CH2)2PPh2}] and to study its chemistry. Some preliminary
results of our studies are communicated herein. The desired
dinuclear gold(I) complex [Au2(µ-C10H6){µ-Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2}]
(1), containing both bridging 1,8-C10H62- and Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2
(dppe) ligands, was obtained in 84% yield from the reaction of
1,8-bis(trimethylstannyl)naphthalene
with
[Au2Cl2-
(µ-Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2)] in dichloromethane (Scheme 1).35 Alter-
natively, the complex can also be prepared from the reaction
of 1,8-naphthalenediboronic acid with [Au2Cl2(µ-Ph2P(CH2)2-
PPh2)] in the presence of base.26
Complex 1 was isolated as a pale yellow air- and moisture-
stable solid, which is soluble in halogenated solvents and acetone
but insoluble in diethyl ether and hexane. The 31P NMR
spectrum of 1 shows a singlet resonance, suggesting the presence
of equivalent phosphorus atoms in the molecule. The MALDI-
mass spectrum shows a peak at m/z 918, corresponding to the
molecular ion peak of the compound, in addition to peaks with
higher m/z values due to formation of various adducts, typically
In dichloromethane, complex 1 absorbs strongly in the UV
region, with the absorption bands (Figure 2) being attributed to
1
an admixture of spin-allowed metal-perturbed intraligand IL
(naphthyl and phosphine) and metal-centered transitions.29 The
aerated solution is weakly emissive upon photoexcitation at
room temperature (Figure 2). However, the intense green
emission of the solution is “turned on” under deoxygenated
conditions (Figure 2) with a lifetime in the microsecond range
(21.8 µs). The emission is vibronically structured with vibra-
(15) Bardaj´ı, M.; Jones, P. G.; Laguna, A.; Laguna, M. Organometallics
1995, 14, 1310–1315.
(16) Bardaj´ı, M.; Gimeno, M. C.; Jones, P. G.; Laguna, A.; Laguna, M.
Organometallics 1994, 13, 3415–3419.
(17) Schmidbaur, H.; Mandl, J. R.; Bassett, J. M.; Blaschke, G.; Zimmer-
Gasser, B. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 433–440.
(18) Bhargava, S. K.; Mohr, F.; Bennett, M. A.; Welling, L. L.; Willis,
A. C. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 4271–4275.
(19) Letsinger, R. L.; Gilpin, J. A.; Vullo, W. J. J. Org. Chem. 1962,
27, 672–674.
(20) Tinga, M. A. G. M.; Schat, G.; Akkerman, O. S.; Bickelhaupt, F.;
Horn, E.; Kooijman, H.; Smeets, W. J. J.; Spek, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 2808–2817.
(21) Cozzi, F.; Sjo¨strand, U.; Mislow, K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979,
174, C1-C2.
(22) Seyferth, D.; Vick, S. C. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 141, 173–
187.
(27) Bhargava, S. K.; Mohr, F.; Bennett, M. A.; Welling, L. L.; Willis,
A. C. Organometallics 2000, 19, 5628–5636.
(28) Bennett, M. A.; Bhargava, S. K.; Hockless, D. C. R.; Mohr, F.;
Watts, K.; Welling, L. L.; Willis, A. C. Z. Naturforsch. 2004, 59b, 1563–
1569.
(29) (a) Yam, V. W.-W.; Choi, S. W.-K.; Cheung, K.-K. Chem.
Commun. 1996, 1173–1174. (b) Partyka, D. V.; Zeller, M.; Hunter, A. D.;
Gray, T. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8188–8191. (c) Naraya-
naswamy, R.; Young, M. A.; Parkhurst, E.; Ouellette, M.; Kerr, M. E.; Ho,
D. M.; Elder, R. C.; Bruce, A. E.; Bruce, M. R. M. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32,
2506. (d) Che, C. M.; Kwong, H. L.; Yam, V. W. W.; Cho, K. C. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 885–886. (e) Yam, V. W. W.; Lai, T. F.; Che,
C. M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1990, 3747–3752.
(23) Tschinkl, M.; Hoefelmeyer, J. D.; Cocker, T. M.; Bachman, R. E.;
Gabba¨ı, F. P. Organometallics 2000, 19, 1826–1828.
(30) (a) Lakowicz, J. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Kluwer/
Plenum: New York, 1999. (b) Omary, M. A.; Elbjeirami, O.; Palehepitiya
Gamage, C. S.; Sherman, K. M.; Rasika Dias, H. V. Inorg. Chem. 2009,
48, 1784–1786.
¨
(24) Schmidbaur, H.; Oller, H. J.; Wilkinson, D. L.; Huber, B.; Mu¨ller,
G. Chem. Ber. 1989, 122, 31–36.
(25) Gabba¨ı, F. P.; Schier, A.; Riede, J.; Sladek, A.; Go¨rlitzer, H. W.
Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 5694–5698.
(26) Partyka, D. V.; Zeller, M.; Hunter, A. D.; Gray, T. G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 25, 8188–8191.
(31) Clark, R. J. H.; Tocher, J. H.; Fackler, J. P., Jr.; Neira, R.; Murray,
H. H.; Knackel, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1986, 303, 437–442.
(32) Bennett, M. A.; Bhargava, S. K.; Griffiths, K. D.; Robertson, G. B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 260–261.