M. Singer et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2273–2276
2275
Table 1
inhibitors to interact through hydrogen bonding to amino acids
within the various CA active sites and that this would be observed
indirectly by modulating Ki values. In fact, the oxidation state of
the sulfur had virtually no impact on the CA inhibition constants
determined. At hCA I inhibition by 8–19 was typically weaker
(10–20-fold) than for all other isozymes with Kis in the mid-high
nM range (60–117 nM). The oxidation state of the sulfur also did
not effect CA I enzyme inhibition, while galactose-OH compounds
(17–19, Kis 60–62 nM) were marginally stronger inhibitors than
glucose-OH compounds (14–16, Kis 101–114 nM) at hCA I. Com-
parison of CA inhibition of our recently reported O-glycosides
20–23 demonstrates that the replacement of O by S (compounds
8, 11, 14, 17), SO (compounds 9, 12, 15, 18) and SO2 (compounds
10, 13, 16, 19) typically gives weaker inhibitors at hCA I, while at
CA II inhibition is similar, and at CA IX inhibition is generally stron-
ger. This trend indicates that the sulfur analogues may prove supe-
rior for selectively targeting tumour associated hCA IX.
To deliver CA based cancer therapies or diagnostics will benefit
enormously from the development of inhibitors that target the tu-
mour-associated CA isozymes. Selective inhibition among CA iso-
zymes is however challenging owing to conservation of active
site topology within this enzyme class. Using our ‘click-tailing’
strategy we have appended thio, sulfinyl and sulfonyl glycoside tail
moieties onto the benzenesulfonamide CA pharmacophore. This
work presents a new class of glycoconjugate CA inhibitors com-
prising S-linked glycosides in three oxidation states. The antici-
pated stability of these glycoside CA inhibitors towards
endogenous glycosidases combined with the effective enzyme
inhibition properties demonstrated in this study towards CA IX
and XII may render these carbohydrate-based sulfonamides as
valuable candidates for future targeting of CAs for therapeutic
applications in hypoxic tumours. Current research in our labora-
tory is targeted towards identifying the structural features within
the CA active site that explain the tight distribution of inhibition
constants observed for this new class of inhibitors so as to support
future rationale design approach for the synthesis of CA inhibitors.
The minimal impact of the oxidation state at the sulfur atom on CA
enzyme inhibition may appear a profitable finding in future CA
drug development strategies where it is necessary to modify phys-
icochemical properties of inhibitors without impacting on drug-
enzyme molecular recognition interactions. This study is therefore
a valuable step in the ongoing research to improve the characteris-
tics of CA inhibitors.
Inhibition and selectivity ratio data for 1, new glycoconjugate sulfonamides 8–19, O-
glycoside analogues 20–23 and standard inhibitors against human isozymes hCA I, II,
IX and XII
Compound
Kia (nM)
hCA Ib
hCA IIb
hCA IXc
hCA XIIc
AZA
BRZ
DRZ
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
900
450
500
3900
91
103
97
117
80
12
3
9
47
25
47
52
5.7
3.0
3.5
n.d.
9.5
8.4
9.1
9.2
9.5
105
8.6
9.9
9.3
8.6
7.7
7.5
257
9.8
9.5
6.1
8.0
8.1
107
9.7
101
101
5.3
5.4
6.9
9.9
6.8
5.3
5.6
7.8
7.6
6.2
2.9
7.8
46
79
10.9
9.5
114
102
101
60
62
60
1500
6.9
7.0
10.2
10.3
10.3
11.9
9.4
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
6.8
8.7
8.7
7.0
n.d.—not determined.
a
Errors in the range of 5–10% of the reported value, from three determinations.
b
c
Human (cloned) isozymes, by the CO2 hydration method.20–22
Catalytic domain of human (cloned) isozyme, by the CO2 hydration
method.20–22
denced by TLC) after 2 h vigorous stirring. De-O-acetylation of 8–
13 by methanolic sodium methoxide was employed to liberate
the corresponding fully deprotected sugar analogues 14–19,
Scheme 2.
Enzyme inhibition data for the new glycoconjugate
sulfonamides 8–19 were determined by assaying the CA catalyzed
hydration of CO2, Table 1.20 Reference data for clinically used
CA inhibitors acetazolamide (AZA), brinzolamide (BRZ) and
dorzolamide (DRZ) have also been included for comparison with
the compounds reported in this study. Data for O-glucoside and
O-galactoside analogues 20–23, reported recently by our groups,
are included for discussion purposes.9
SO2NH2
SO2NH2
R2
R2
OAc
OH
O
O
R1
AcO
R1
HO
Acknowledgements
N
N
N
N
O
O
AcO
HO
N
N
This work was financed in part by the Australian Research
Council (Grant number DP0877554 to S.-A.P.); the Eskitis Institute
for Cell and Molecular Therapies and an EU grant of the 6th frame-
work programme (DeZnIT project to C.T.S.). We thank Hoan The Vu
for undertaking accurate mass measurements.
(R1 = OAc, R2 = H)
(R1 = OAc, R2 = H)
20
21
22
23
(R1 = H, R2 = OAc)
(R1 = H, R2 = OAc)
The parent azido scaffold 7 had greatest efficacy against hCA II (Ki of
47 nM), approximately twofold weaker inhibition against the tu-
mour-associated hCA IX (105 nM) and 80-fold weaker inhibition
against hCA I (3900 nM). The inhibition profile for 7 was weaker
at all isozymes compared to the clinically used sulfonamide inhibi-
tors AZA, BRZ and DRZ, however 7 did have a similar selectivity pro-
file to AZA. The new glycoconjugates were investigated both in the
per-O-acetylated form (compounds 8–13) and the free hydroxyl
form (compounds 14–19). All glycoconjugates were stronger inhib-
itors than the parent azido compound 7 at the CA isozymes tested.
Glycosides were potent inhibitors of hCA II (Kis 2.9–9.9 nM), IX
(Kis 6.1–9.9 nM) and XII (Kis 8.4–11.9 nM) with Ki values narrowly
distributed—and just one outlier to this trend—compound 14 with
a Ki of 257 nM at hCA IX. The tight distribution of Ki values sur-
prised us as we had expected that the oxidation of the sulfur would
provide an increased opportunity for these small molecule
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (synthetic procedures, compound charac-
terization data and 1H NMR spectra for new compounds) associ-
ated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
1. Supuran, C. T. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2008, 7, 168.
2. Thiry, A.; Dogné, J. M.; Masereel, B.; Supuran, C. T. TIPS 2006, 27, 566.
3. Svastova, E.; Hulikova, A.; Rafajova, M.; Zatovicova, M.; Gibadulinova, A.;
Casini, A.; Cecchi, A.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T.; Pastorek, J.; Pastorekova, S.
FEBS Lett. 2004, 577, 439.