Unlike the N1 of pyrimidines and the N9 of adenine, the
N9-position of guanine, which is incorporated into a number
of antiviral and anticancer nucleoside compounds,8 and the
5-position of 2-amino-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one
derivatives are not sufficiently activated for direct glycosyl-
ation.9 The classic solution to the preparation of 2-amino-
3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one nuclosides is to
convert the 5-functionalized-2-amino-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]py-
rimidin-4(7H)-one to the 4-chloro compound, which is
suitable for reaction with an activated sugar (e.g., 1-chloro-
2-deoxy-3,5-di-O-p-toluoyl-R-D-erythro-pentofuranose).10 The
4-chloro nucleoside is then converted back to the keto
derivative by hydrolysis.7 In addition to the extra synthetic
steps, the 4-chloro derivatives have very poor solubility
characteristics,11 which confounds their functionalization.7b,8b
If the synthesis of 5-substituted 2-amino-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-
d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one starts with 4-chloro-2-amino-3H-
pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one, it must be first converted
to the 5-iodo compound prior to the introduction of modi-
fications to the 5-position by metal-mediated Sonoga-
shira,7e,12 Stille,13 or related cross-coupling reactions.
In an effort to prepare a series of 5-substituted 2-amino-
7-((2R,4R,5R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-fu-
ran-2-yl)-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one modified
DNAs (Figure 2) to (1) extend studies on how cationic and
We report herein the synthesis of 5-aminomethyl- and
5-hydroxymethyl-2-amino-7-((2R,4R,5R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-
5-(hydroxymethyl)furan-2-yl)-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-
4(7H)-ones as examples of a convenient, efficient, and
general route to 5-substituted 2-amino-7-((2R,4R,5R)-tet-
rahydro-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)furan-2-yl)-3H-pyrro-
lo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-ones that involves mild reaction
conditions. It is also demonstrated that the approach is
amenable to the preparation of guanine nucleosides.
The synthesis started with 5-substituted 2-amino-3H-
pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one compounds (1 and 2) that
were prepared by condensation of the ω-substituted alde-
hydes16 with 2,6-diaminopyrimidin-4(3H)-one.17 As men-
tioned above, normally, the 5-substituted 2-amino-3H-
pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one would be transformed to
the 4-halo derivative to activate the 7-position for reaction
with a protected 1-chloro-2-deoxy-R-D-erythro-pentofura-
nose.10 Attempts to convert 1 and 2 to the 4-chloro
compounds were unsuccessful.
It was envisioned that the tetra-Boc derivatives of 1 and
2 could be prepared and then selectively deprotected to reveal
the pyrrole NH-7 for coupling with a reactive Cl sugar
(Figure 3).
Figure 3. Design of 5-substituted 2-amino-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyri-
midin-4(7H)-one as new coupling precusors with improved solubil-
ity.
Figure 2. 5-Aminomethyl- (left) and 5-hydroxymethyl- (right)
2-amino-7-((2R,4R,5R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)fu-
ran-2-yl)-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-ones in DNA.
Compounds 1 and 2 have very limited solubility, so they
were treated as a suspension in MeCN with excess Boc2O.
After several days at rt, all of the solid starting material had
gone into solution. Instead of the anticipated tetra-Boc
derivative, it was found that 1 and 2 afforded the tris-Boc-
protected O4-t-Bu ether compounds 7 and 8, respectively
(Scheme 1). Fortuitously, formation of the O-t-Bu ethers
negates the need to convert the 2-amino-3H-pyrrolo[2,3-
d]pyrimidin-4(7H)-one nucleus into the 4-chloro derivative
prior to sugar coupling.
polar groups located near the floor of the major groove affect
the thermodynamic stability, reactivity, and structure of
DNA14 and (2) generate stable interstrand cross-links,15 we
found that the existing synthetic schemes were not suitable.
(8) (a) Sims, K. A.; Woodland, A. M. Pharmacotherapy 2006, 12, 1745–
1757. (b) Field, A. K.; Tuomari, A. V.; McGeever-Rubin, B.; Terry, B. J.;
Mazina, K. E.; Haffey, M. L.; Hagen, M. E.; Clark, J. M.; Braitman, A.;
Slusarchyk, W. A. AntiViral Res. 1990, 13, 41–52. (c) Brigden, D.; Fiddian,
P.; Rosling, A. E.; Ravenscroft, T. AntiViral Res. 1981, 1, 203–212. (d)
Vere Hodge, R. A.; Sutton, D.; Boyd, M. R.; Harnden, M. R.; Jarvest, R. L.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989, 33, 1765–7173. (e) Lee, J.; Chuang,
T.-H.; Redecke, V.; She, L.; Pitha, P. M.; Carson, D. A.; Raz, E.; Cottam,
H. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 6646–6651.
To elucidate the origin of the O4-t-Bu ethers 7 and 8, the
reactions were monitored by TLC and LC/MS analysis. Time
(14) (a) Manning, G. S. Q. ReV. Biophys. 1978, 2, 179–246. (b) Record,
M. T.; Anderson, C. F.; Lohman, T. M. Q. ReV. Biophys. 1978, 2, 103–
179. (c) Honig, B.; Nicholls, A. Science 1995, 268, 1144–1149. (d) Gold,
B. Biopolymers 2002, 65, 173–179. (e) Gold, B.; Marky, L. M.; Stone,
M. P.; Williams, L. D. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1402–1414.
(15) (a) Wilds, C. J.; Noronha, A. M.; Robidoux, S.; Miller, P. S.
Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2005, 4, 965–969. (b) Ra¨schle, M.;
Knipsheer, P.; Enoiu, M.; Angelov, T.; Sun, J.; Griffith, J. D.; Ellenberger,
T. E.; Scha¨rer, O. D.; Walter, J. C. Cell 2008, 134, 969–980.
(16) De Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
3041–3043.
(9) (a) Tolman, R. L.; Tolman, G. L.; Robins, R. K.; Townsend, L. B.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1970, 7, 799–806. (b) Seela, F.; Westermann, B.;
Bindig, U. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 697–702.
(10) Ramasamy, K.; Imamura, N.; Robins, R. K.; Revankar, G. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 43, 5107–5100.
(11) Dey, S.; Garner, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7697–7699.
(12) (a) Jager, S.; Rasched, G.; Kornreich-Leshem, H.; Engeser, M.;
Thum, O.; Famulok, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15071–15082. (b)
Seela, F.; Shaikh, K. I. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 2675–2681
(13) Angelov, T.; Guainazzi, A.; Scharer, O. D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
661–664.
.
(17) (a) Klepper, F.; Polborn, K.; Carell, T. HelV. Chim. Acta 2005, 88,
2610–2616. (b) Barnett, C. J.; Grubb, L. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
9741–9745.
2466
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009