Scheme 1. Degradation Experiment of Biselyngbyaside (1)
C6D6 (see Supporting Information). The geometries of the
two trisubstituted olefins in 1 were clarified to be 8E and
18Z, respectively, based on the NOESY correlation of H25/
H10, and H27/H18. The 4E, 12E, and 14E geometries were
determined from the H4-H5, H12-H13, and H14-H15
trans-coupling constants (15.1, 16.6, and 16.6 Hz, respec-
tively). In addition to these results, NOESY correlations were
observed between H13 and H11, and between H14 and H16.
A careful analysis of NOESY correlation observed between
H21 and H23 revealed a 21E geometry. Thus, the gross
structure of biselyngbyaside (1) was determined to be as
shown in Figure 1.
assigned based on the 2D-NMR spectra, and the ∆δ values
(δS-δR, Hz) were then calculated. These results established
Figure 2. ∆δ values (∆δS-R) in ppm for bis-S- and bis-R-MTPA
esters (3 and 4, 7 and 8).
The absolute stereochemistries of C3, C17, and the 3-O-
methylglucoside moiety in 1 were determined by the modi-
fied Mosher’s method12 and synthetic means. Methanolysis
of 1 gave methyl ester 2 along with elimination of the sugar
(Scheme 1). Since 1 is unstable under acidic and basic
conditions, hydrogenation and subsequent acid hydrolysis
provided 3-O-methylglucoside 5 and ꢀ-hydroxy methyl ester
6 accompanied by hydrogenolysis at C7 and C17 (Scheme
1). Derived products 2 and 6 were transformed into the (R)-
and (S)-MTPA esters, 3 and 4, and 7 and 8, respectively
that the absolute stereochemistries of C3 and C17 in 1 were
3R and 17R, respectively (Figure 2). Furthermore, tribro-
mobenzoylation of 5 afforded methyl 2,4,6-tri-O-(4-bro-
mobenzoyl)-3-O-methyl-R-D-glucose 9, which was identified
by 1H NMR data and CD data (see Supporting Information).
An authentic sample of 9 was prepared from D-glucose.
The absolute stereochemistries of C7 and C10 in 1 were
determined by enantioselective synthesis of the degradation
product from natural 1. The oxidative degradation of 1 into
biscarbamates 10 was effected by a three-step sequence.
The synthesis of degradation product 10 started from
known aldehyde 11a.13 The (2R)-aldehyde 11a was con-
verted into aldehyde 12 in three steps. Treatment of 12 with
1
(Scheme 1). The H NMR signals of these esters were
(4) Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Doubek, D. L.; Herald, D. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6846–6848.
(5) Pettit, G. R.; Kamano, Y.; Herald, C. L.; Tuiman, A. A.; Boettner,
E. F.; Kizu, H.; Schmidt, J. M.; Baczynskyj, L.; Tomer, K. B.; Bontems,
R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6883–6885.
(6) (a) Gerwick, W. H.; Tan, L. T.; Sitachitta, N. Alkaloids 2001, 57,
75–184. (b) Tan, L. T. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 954–979.
(7) Schmitz, F. J.; Gunasekera, S. P.; Yalamanchili, G.; Bilayet Hossain,
M.; Van Der Helm, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7251–7252.
(8) Fusetani, N.; Sugawara, T.; Matsunaga, S.; Hirota, H. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 4971–4974.
(10) (a) West, L. M.; Northcote, P. T.; Battershill, C. N. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 445–449. (b) Hood, K. A.; West, L. M.; Rouwe, B.; Northcote,
P. T.; Berridge, M. V.; Wakefield. St., J.; Miller, J. H. Cancer Res. 2002,
62, 3356–3360.
(11) Bock, K.; Pedersen, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perk. Trans 2 1974, 293–
297.
(9) (a) Corley, D. G.; Herb, R.; Moore, R. E.; Scheuer, P. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 3644–3646. (b) Jefford, C. W.; Bernadinelli, G.; Tanaka,
J.; Higa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 159–162. (c) Mooberry, S. L.; Tien,
G.; Hernandez, A. H.; Plubrukarn, A.; Davidson, B. S. Cancer Res. 1999,
59, 653–660.
(12) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 4092–4096.
(13) Pattenden, G.; Chattopadhyay, S. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
5271–5274.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009
2423