A consequence of the straightforward synthesis of tetra- and
1,3-diformylcalix[4]arenes, in addition to the ease of ex-
perimental design associated with undertaking ionic hydro-
genations, should, when these two protocols are dovetailed
together, afford a powerful procedure for the synthesis of
urea- or carbamate-derived calix[4]arenes.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Calix[4]arenes via Ionic Hydrogenation
To initiate our work, a series of model reactions were
performed using 1. Utilizing reaction conditions reported by
Dube and Scholte6 (Scheme 2), we were delighted that
Scheme 2. Synthesis of N,O-Substituted Carbamate
Calix[4]arenes 2-8 and Bis(amine) 9
possible to chemoselectively append structurally diverse
moieties onto the upper and/or lower rim of the calix[4]arene
macrocycle.
Given the chemical and structural versatility of the
calixarene motif, it is not surprising that upper-rim appended
N,N′-disubstituted urea or N,O-disubstituted carbamate
derived calix[4]arenes are of considerable utility. With this
in mind, however, it is interesting to note that relatively few
strategies for their efficient synthesis have been reported.2
Thus, Ungaro et al. published a multistep synthesis of upper-
rim anchored 1,3-di(thio)urea calix[4]arenes in an overall
∼25% yield (over six steps).3 Furthermore, the same authors
communicated an alternative, but lower yielding, procedure
(15% overall yield for four steps) that also generated N,N′-
disubstituted (thio)ureas. Ungaro’s latter procedure employed,
as a critical step, an experimentally inconvenient 200 °C
cyanation reaction (CuCN) of p-bromocalix[4]arene that was
relatively low yielding, i.e., 56%.
Searching for an alternative protocol that did not require
high reaction temperatures or the synthesis/use of chloro-
formates or isocyanate intermediates, we considered the
possibility of performing a one-pot condensation-ionic
hydrogenation reaction between an O- or N-substituted
carbamate or urea and a formylcalix[4]arene. Ionic hydro-
genations routinely employ a binary mixture of TFA (H+
donor) and triethylsilane (H- donor) for the efficient reduc-
tion of a variety of functional groups, i.e., alkenes, dienes,
aldehydes, imines, and saturated and unsaturated ketones.4
To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of any
ionic hydrogenation protocols being used for the synthesis
of upper-(or lower-)rim urea-functionalized calix[4]arenes.5
O-benzyl carbamate afforded the corresponding upper-rim
appended N,O-disubstituted carbamate 2 in an excellent 74%
yield. Similarly, O-tert-butyl carbamate afforded 3 in a 72%
yield. It is worthy of note that the use of TFA, a reagent
well-known for its ability to cleave N- and O-Boc groups,7
was not a concern, the tert-butyl group on 3 remaining intact
during the reaction; similarly O-allyl carbamate afforded 4
in an 81% yield. Increasing the steric bias on the upper rim,
we incorporated 5 into the ionic hydrogenation protocol.
Gratifyingly, 5 reacted with O-benzyl carbamate, O-tert-butyl
carbamate, and O-allyl carbamate to afford the corresponding
N,O-disubstituted carbamate-derived calix[4]arenes 6-8 in
unoptimized but respectrable 89%, 71%, and 76% yields.
Utilizing our efficient, one-pot synthesis of 2, it seemed
entirely plausible that cleavage of the Cbz groups off the
nitrogen atoms of 2 would generate 9. Subjecting 2 to
hydrogenation (1 atm of H2, 10 mol % of Pd/C) afforded
tetra-n-propoxy-1,3-di(aminomethylene)calix[4]arene 9 in an
excellent 89% yield (66% overall yield from 1). Thus, a
combination of ionic hydrogenation with subsequent low-
pressure hydrogenation represents an improvement, not only
in experimental design but also reaction efficiency.
As previously affirmed by Ungaro et al., upper-rim
appended 1,3-(N,N-disubstituted urea)calix[4]arenes are at-
tractive synthetic targets; however, their widespread applica-
tion and use is limited by their ease of synthesis and
availability. Utilizing fewer chemical steps via a procedure
that employed readily generated 1, an arylurea, and our ionic
hydrogenation procedure, we pondered the possibility of
efficiently synthesizing N-arylurea calix[4]arenes. Gratify-
(1) Gutsche, C. D.; Dhawan, B.; No, K. N.; Murthukrishan, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 103, 3782. (a) Bo¨hmer, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1995, 34, 713. (b) Bo¨hmer, V. Chemistry of Phenols; Rappoport, Z., Ed.;
Wiley: Chichester, England, 2003; p 1369.
(2) Rudzevich, Y.; Vysotsky, M. O.; Bohmer, V.; Brody, M. S.; Rebek,
J., Jr.; Broda, F.; Thondorf, I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3080.2.
Castellano, R. K.; Craig, S. L.; Nuckolls, C.; Rebek Jr, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 7876. Moon, K.; Kaifer, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 15016. Gaeta, C.; Vysotsky, M. O.; Bogdan, A.; Bo¨hmer, V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13136.
(5) We thank one of the reviewers for bringing to our attention the
following publications: Kuno, L.; Seri, N.; Bialli, S. E. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
1577. Agbaria, K.; Biali, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5482. Van Gelder,
J. M.; Brenn, J.; Thondorf, I.; Biali, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3511.
(6) Dube, D.; Scholte, A. A. Tetrahedron. Lett 1999, 40, 2295.
(7) Greeene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. ProtectiVe Groups In Organic
Synthesis; Wiley-Interscience: Chichester, West Sussex, 1991.
(3) Casnati, A.; Fochi, M.; Minari, P.; Pochini, A.; Reggiani, M.; Ungaro,
R.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1996, 126, 99.
(4) Kursanor, D. N.; Parnes, Z. N.; Loim, N. M. Synthesis 1973, 633.
2484
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 12, 2009