of supramolecular structures of different morphology and
dimensionality (vesicles, toroids, networks or wires) from
simple radial oligo(phenylene ethynylenes) (OPEs).9
Herein, we report on the synthesis, redox properties, and
self-assembling features of a series of triangular-shape
amphiphilic OPEs decorated with a variable number of polar
tryethyleneglycol (TEG) and aliphatic decyl chains in their
periphery. The similar size and electronic properties of the
new amphiphiles reported discard any preferential dispersion
or Coulombic effect in their π-stacking, and therefore, a
direct evaluation of the influence of solvophobic effects in
the self-assembly can be extracted from this type of discrete
amphiphilic systems.
the heptamer (m/z ) 5964) are distinguishable for 1 and 2,
respectively (Figures S1 and S2, Supporting Information).
Similar results have been obtained for the previously reported
congeners S19a and S212 (see the Supporting Information)
bearing three TEG or three decyl chains, respectively (Figure
S3, Supporting Information).
The self-assembly features of 1 and 2 in solution were
first investigated by concentration-dependent 1H NMR
experiments (Figures 1 and S4, Supporting Information).
Compounds 1 and 2, endowed with a variable number of
TEG and decyl chains and, therefore, with a modulated
hydrophilia/hydrophobia relationship, have been readily
obtained by following a one-pot Sonogashira cross-coupling
protocol10 in which the decyloxyphenyl units are first
attached to the central aromatic fragment. Thus, for the
synthesis of 1, endowed with two TEG and only one decyl
chains, 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene (3b)11 was reacted with 1
equiv of the 1-(decyloxy)-4-iodobenzene 4a12 in the presence
of triethylamine, copper iodide, and Pd(PPh3)Cl2 as catalyst.
The reaction was monitored by TLC until all starting
materials 3b and 4a disappeared. After that, an excess of
4b9a was added to the reaction mixture to afford 1 in 26%
yield (Scheme 1). A similar strategy was followed to obtain
1
Figure 1
.
Partial H NMR spectra (CD3CN, 300 MHz) of 1 at
different concentrations (1.5-100 mM).
1
Concentration-dependent H NMR studies of 1 in CD3CN
(300 MHz, 298 K, 1.5-100 mM)13 show slight upfield shifts
of most resonances upon increasing concentration, indicative
of an eclipsed face-to-face π-π stacking (Figure 1).4
However, only the resonance corresponding to the protons
of the central aromatic ring experienced a small shielding
effect with increasing concentration when similar studies
were carried out with 1 and 2 in C6D6 (300 MHz, 298 K,
1.5-100 mM) (Figure S4, Supporting Information), which
can be attributed to a rotated offset π-stacking.4 Plotting the
variation of the chemical shifts versus concentration reveals
the different participation of the aromatic moieties in
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Triangular-Shape Amphiphiles 1 and 2
(6) (a) Ghosh, S.; Li, X.-Q.; Stepanenko, V.; Wu¨rthner, F. Chem.sEur.
J. 2008, 14, 11343–1357. (b) Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Wu¨rthner, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4886–4887. (c) Xu, B. Q.; Xiao, X.; Yang, X.; Zang,
L.; Tao, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2386–2387.
(7) (a) Hong, D.-J.; Lee, E.; Jeong, H.; Lee, J.; Zin, W.-C.; Nguyen,
T. D.; Glotzer, S. C.; Lee, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1664–
1668. (b) Ryu, J.-H.; Hong, D.-J.; Lee, M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1043–
1054.
2, which possesses two decyl and one TEG chains, in 33%
yield (Scheme 1). Compounds 1 and 2 have been fully
characterized by NMR, FTIR, and UV-vis spectroscopy and
MALDI-TOF spectrometry (see the Supporting Information).
A first insight into the self-assembly ability of compounds
1 and 2 was obtained from the corresponding MALDI-TOF
spectra. Both amphiphiles show no preferential self-as-
sembling properties in the gas phase since the presence of
aggregated species up to the pentamer (m/z ) 4290) and to
(8) (a) Ajayaghosh, A.; Praveen, V. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 644–
656. (b) Hoeben, F. J. M.; Shklyarevskiy, I. O.; Pouderoijen, M. J.;
Engelkamp, H.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Christiansen, P. C. M.; Maan, J. C.;
Meijer, E. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1232–1236.
(9) (a) Ferna´ndez, G.; Garc´ıa, F.; Sa´nchez, L. Chem. Commun. 2008,
6567–6569. (b) Garc´ıa, F.; Ferna´ndez, G.; Sa´nchez, L. Chem.sEur. J., in
press., DOI: 10.1002/chem.200900303.
(10) Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich, F., Stang,
P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1998.
(11) Uhl, W.; Bock, H. R.; Breher, F.; Claesener, M.; Haddadpour, S.;
Jasper, B.; Hepp, A. Organometallics 2007, 26, 2363–2369.
(12) Haino, T.; Tanaka, M.; Fukazawa, Y. Chem. Commun. 2008, 468–
470.
(5) (a) Hill, J. P.; Jin, W. S.; Kosaka, A.; Fukushima, T.; Ichihara, H.;
Shimomura, T.; Ito, K.; Hashizume, T.; Ishii, N.; Aida, T. Science 2004,
304, 1481–1483. (b) Kastler, M.; Pisula, W.; Wasserfallen, D.; Pakula, T.;
Mu¨llen, K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4286–4296. (c) Yamamoto, Y.;
Fukushima, T.; Suna, Y.; Ishii, N.; Saeki, A.; Seki, S.; Tagawa, S.;
Taniguchi, M.; Kawai, T.; Aida, T. Science 2006, 314, 1761–1764.
(13) The scarce solubility of less polar 2 in CD3CN at concentrations
1
above of 10 mM has prevented a concentration-dependent H NMR study
in this solvent.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2749