G Model
CCLET-5845; No. of Pages 4
S. Tan et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2020) xxx–xxx
3
(-152.124 kcal/mol) due to the
p
-p
stacking interaction between
BODIPY groups and graphite substrate. The interaction energies
between molecules and substrate of three assembly systems are all
much lower than the interaction energies between molecules,
indicating that the absorption between molecules and HOPG
substrate is quite strong.
The total energies (including the interaction energies between
molecules and the interaction energies between molecules and
substrate) of three self-assembly systems are presented in Table 2.
In general, the total energy can be compared to evaluate the
relative thermodynamic stability of different assembly systems
with the same unit cell. However, the effect of the unit area should
be considered when comparing two systems with different unit
cells. For the assembly system with the smaller unit cell, more
molecules would be adsorbed on the surface within the same area,
thus contributing more interaction energy to the system. [26]
Therefore, the total energy per unit area is also calculated to avoid
such effect. As displayed in the last column in Table 2, the total
Fig. 3. STM images of LC-amide-2 assembly structure at the HOPG/1-phenyloctane
interface: (a) Large scale; (b) high resolution. Tunneling conditions: Iset = 222.7 pA,
Vbias =693.2 mV. (c) The simulated molecular packing structure.
Table 1
Experimental (Expt.) and calculated (Cal.) unit cell parameters of the self-
assemblies on the HOPG surface.
Sample
a (nm)
b (nm)
α (ꢀ)
LC-amide-1
Expt.
Cal.
Expt.
Cal.
Expt.
Cal.
4.8 Æ 0.1
4.8
3.5 Æ 0.1
3.5
85 Æ 1ꢀ
85
energy per unit area of LC-amide-2 system (-0.234 kcal molÀ1 Å-2
)
LC-ester
4.3 Æ 0.1
4.3 Æ 0.1
105 Æ 1ꢀ
105
is the highest and the total energy per unit area of LC-amide-1
system (-0.338 kcal molÀ1 Å-2) is slightly lower than that of the LC-
ester system (-0.303 kcal molÀ1 Å-2), which suggests that the self-
assembly of LC-amide-1 is most thermodynamically stable.
As mentioned above, the three liquid crystal molecules all
assemble into the linear patterns at the HOPG/1-phenyloctane
interface. However, the differences in the backbone of molecules
lead to different linear structures. As for the self-assembly of LC-
amide-1 and LC-ester, the linear patterns are both formed by the
arrangement of dimers. The two liquid crystal molecules in the
4.3
4.3
LC-amide-2
3.0 Æ 0.1
3.0
2.5 Æ 0.1
2.5
110 Æ 2ꢀ
108
acetylene linkages and alkyl chains cannot be explicitly character-
ized due to the much lower density of electric states. Combined
with the simulated molecular packing structures shown in Fig. 3c,
it can be inferred that the alkyl chains are aligned into one
direction and the amide groups are too far apart to form hydrogen
bonds. Therefore, the assembly motif mostly derives from the van
der Waals interaction between these alkyl chains. The parameters
of the unit cells overlaid in Fig. 3b are measured as follows:
a = 3 Æ 0.1 nm, b = 2.5 Æ 0.1 nm, α = 110 Æ 2ꢀ.
dimer can interact through p-p stacking interaction. Moreover, the
amide moieties in LC-amide-1 molecules can form hydrogen
bonds, while the ester moieties in LC-ester molecules cannot.
Therefore, it can be distinguished that the two LC-amide-1
molecules in the dimer are arranged much closer comparing to
the arrangement of LC-ester dimer, which agrees well with the
result that the interaction energy between LC-amide-1 molecules
(-149.536 kcal/mol) is lower than that between LC-ester molecules
(-134.914 kcal/mol). As for the self-assembly of LC-amide-2, the
linear pattern is formed by the arrangement of molecules instead
of dimers. The van der Waals interaction between alkyl chains is
the primary assembly motif, and the alkyl chains are arranged into
one direction to maximize the van der Waals interaction.
Moreover, as shown in Fig. 3, the lowermost end of the backbone
of the LC-amide-2 molecule is aligned with the uppermost end of
the backbone of the lower right molecule to make the alkyl chains
be aligned and interact more with each other. Hence the amide
groups are too far apart to form the hydrogen bonds. Considering
that the only difference between the molecular structures of LC-
amide-1 and LC-amide-2 is the BODIPY group, it can be inferred
To better understand the self-assembly structures of three
liquid crystal molecules, the unit cell parameters and interaction
energies are calculated by the DFT method based on the STM
characterizations. The details of DFTcalculation can be found in the
Supporting Information. Table 1 lists the calculated unit cell
parameters of three assembly systems, which agree well with the
corresponding experimental results. The interaction energies of
three self-assemblies are presented in Table 2 and the lower energy
indicates the stronger interaction herein. It can be observed that
the interaction energy between LC-amide-1 molecules
(-149.536 kcal/mol) is lower than that between LC-ester molecules
(-134.914 kcal/mol), which is largely due to the extra N-HÁÁÁ
O
hydrogen bonds between amide groups of LC-amide-1 molecules.
And the interaction energy between LC-amide-2 molecules
(-16.254 kcal/mol) is much higher because LC-amide-2 molecules
mainly interact through the weak van der Waals interaction.
Besides the interaction between assembled molecules, the
interaction between molecules and substrate also plays a crucial
part in the surface assembly. As shown in the second column in
Table 2, the interaction energy between LC-amide-1 molecules and
substrate (-418.567 kcal/mol) is similar to that between LC-ester
molecules and substrate (-421.721 kcal/mol), which are both lower
than that between LC-amide-2 molecules and substrate
that the
p-p stacking interaction is also important in forming
dimers. Combined with the DFT result that the interaction energy
between LC-amide-1 molecules (-149.536 kcal/mol) is much lower
than that of LC-amide-2 molecules (-16.254 kcal/mol), it can be
inferred that the interaction between LC-amide-2 molecules is not
strong enough to form dimers with the absence of
p-p stacking
interaction and hydrogen bonding interaction. Considering the
Table 2
Total energies and energies per unit area of self-assemblies on the HOPG surfacea.
Sample
Interactions between
molecules (kcal/mol)
Interactions between molecules
and substrate (kcal/mol)
Total energy
(kcal/mol)
Total energy per unit
area (kcal molÀ1 Å-2
)
LC-amide-1
LC-ester
LC-amide-2
À149.536
À134.914
À16.254
À418.567
À421.721
À152.124
À568.103
À561.635
À168.378
À0.338
À0.303
À0.234
a
The total energy includes the interaction energies between molecules and the interaction energies between molecules and substrate.
Please cite this article in press as: S. Tan, et al., Influence of functional groups on the self-assembly of liquid crystals, Chin. Chem. Lett. (2020),