3226
M. D. Helm et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 3224–3226
2001, 2727; (d) Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 10351; (e) Dahlén, A.;
Hilmersson, G. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 3393; (f) Edmonds, D. J.; Johnston, D.;
Procter, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3371; (g) Gopalaiah, K.; Kagan, H. B. New J.
Chem. 2008, 32, 607.
2. (a) Johnston, D.; McCusker, C. M.; Procter, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4913;
(b) Johnston, D.; McCusker, C. F.; Muir, K.; Procter, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 681.
3. (a) Johnston, D.; Francon, N.; Edmonds, D. J.; Procter, D. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
2001; (b) Johnston, D.; Couché, E.; Edmonds, D. J.; Muir, K.; Procter, D. J. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2003, 328; (c) Edmonds, D. J.; Muir, K. W.; Procter, D. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 3190; (d) Baker, T. M.; Edmonds, D. J.; Hamilton, D.; O’Brien, C.
J.; Procter, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5631.
4. (a) Hutton, T. K.; Muir, K.; Procter, D. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2345; (b) Hutton, T. K.;
Muir, K.; Procter, D. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4811; (c) Guazzelli, G.; Duffy, L. A.;
Procter, D. J. Org. Lett. 2008, 19, 4291.
Scheme 6. Sequential dialdehyde cyclization of 3f mediated by SmI2.
Sm
R3
Sm
O
O
O
R2
O
O
H
O
R2
R3
Sm
O
O
H
H
R2
R1
R1
H
5. Sloan, L. A.; Baker, T. M.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; Procter, D. J. Synlett 2007, 3155.
6. Findley, T. J. K.; Sucunza, D.; Miller, L. C.; Davies, D. T.; Procter, D. J. Chem.-Eur. J.
2008, 14, 6862.
O
Sm
Sm
R1
O
11
10
9
O
O
R3
7. Takahashi, S.; Kubota, A.; Nakata, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4751.
Sm
chelation–controlled
aldol cyclization
anti–radical cyclization
8. When the alkene is sufficiently electron deficient, as is the case with
a,b-
unsaturated esters, an alternative mechanism involving reduction of the alkene
and a subsequent radical or anionic addition to the aldehyde is also possible,
although such
a mechanism is less frequently proposed. This alternative
5a–e
3a–e
mechanism could also explain the selectivity seen in our studies and those of
Takahashi and Nakata.
Scheme 7. Origin of diastereoselectivity in the dialdehyde cyclization sequence.
9. For a review of the chemistry of samarium enolates, see: Rudkin, I. M.; Miller, L.
C.; Procter, D. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 34, 19.
10. Enholm, E. J.; Trivellas, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1627.
11. Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6299.
12. Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155.
groups may increase the reactivity of the proximal aldehyde group
1 leading to its selective reduction over the more-remote alde-
hyde.8 It is well appreciated that pre-coordination of Lewis acidic
samarium to the carbonyl and unsaturated ester components in
ketyl-olefin additions is important for promoting reaction and con-
trolling the diastereoselectivity of such additions.16
In summary, we have shown the feasibility of SmI2-mediated,
dialdehyde cyclization cascades in which one aldehyde is reduced
while the other waits in line. In the dialdehyde cyclization cascades
studied here, two rings and four contiguous stereocenters are gen-
erated with high diastereocontrol. We believe that the cascade
reaction of dialdehydes constitutes a new class of SmI2-mediated
sequence.1a
13. No minor diastereoisomers were observed in the crude 1H NMR. For spirocycle
5a: SmI2 in THF (0.1 M, 6.9 mL, 0.690 mmol) was added to degassed t-BuOH
(1.8 mL) and the resulting solution was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere
for 20 minutes before being cooled to 0 °C (ice bath). After cooling, the
dialdehyde 3a (77 mg, 0.277 mmol) was added dropwise as a solution in THF
(2 mL), and the reaction was stirred for 30 min before excess SmI2 was
quenched by allowing air to reach the reaction. Once the solution was yellow, a
saturated aqueous solution of K/Na tartrate was added and the crude reaction
mixture was extracted with Et2O (3 Â 20 mL). The combined organic fractions
were washed with water (10 mL) and brine (10 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude products were purified by chromatography
on silica gel to give spirocycle 5a (70 mg, 90%, dr >95:5) as a colorless solid. Mp
191 °C (CH2Cl2–hexane). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 1.04–1.18 (2H, m,
CH2), 1.28–1.4 (1H, m, CH2), 1.41–1.56 (3H, m, CH2), 1.58–1.69 (1H, m, CH2),
1.70–1.84 (2H, m, CH2), 1.76 (3H, s, CH3), 1.84–1.98 (1H, m, CH2), 2.01–2.14
(1H, m, CH2), 2.14–2.28 (1H, m, CH2), 2.42 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, CHCHOH), 3.98
(1H, m, CH2CHOH), 4.23 (1H, m, 1H from CH2O), 4.33 (2H, m, CHCHOH and 1H
from CH2O), 4.57 (2H, s, @CH2), 5.56 (1H, d, J = 4.0 Hz, OH), 5.75 (1H, d,
J = 4.3 Hz, OH). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): d 18.4, 19.9, 25.5, 28.7, 29.7,
Acknowledgments
We thank the EPSRC (M.D.H. and DTA studentship to M.d.S.),
and the EC (Marie-Curie Fellowship to D.S.) for financial support.
31.4, 37.9, 49.2, 49.7, 50.0, 65.0, 71.0, 72.9, 107.2, 150.0, 173.9. mmax (thin film)
cmÀ1 3335 (br), 2924 (s), 2862 (m), 2849 (m), 1715 (s, C@O), 1632 (w), 1451
(w), 1257 (m). MS (EI+) m/z (%): 303 (100, M+Na), 281 (42, M+H). HRMS: calcd
for C16H24O4Na (M+Na): 303.1567. Found: 303.1566.
References and notes
14. The crystal structures have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Center (CCDC 716348–716350).
15. Curran, D. P.; Fevig, T. L.; Jasperse, C. P.; Totleben, M. J. Synlett 1992, 943.
16. For an illustrative example, see Ref. 3b.
1. For recent reviews on the use of samarium(II) iodide: (a) Molander, G. A.;
Harris, C. R. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 3321; (b) Kagan, H.; Namy, J. L. In
Lanthanides: Chemistry and Use in Organic Synthesis; Kobayashi, S., Ed.;
Springer: Berlin, 1999; p 155; (c) Steel, P. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1